Chen Yian, Huang-Lionnet Julie H Y, Cohen Steven P
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Medicine, Greenwich Anesthesiology Associates, Greenwich Hospital, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1111-1130. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw268.
Coccydynia is a condition with a multitude of different causes, characterized by ill-defined management. There are multiple prospective studies, including several controlled trials, that have evaluated conservative therapies. Additionally, a plethora of observational studies have assessed coccygectomy, but few studies have reported results for nonsurgical interventional procedures. In this report, we describe the treatment results of 12 patients who received conventional or pulsed radiofrequency for coccydynia and systematically review the literature on management.
We performed a retrospective data analysis evaluating patients who underwent pulsed or conventional radiofrequency treatment at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. A comprehensive literature review was also performed to contextualize these results.
The mean age of patients treated was 50.25 years (SD = 11.20 years, range = 32-72 years), with the mean duration of symptoms being 3.6 years (SD = 3.36 years, range 1-10 years). There were 10 males and two females in this cohort. Among patients who received radiofrequency treatment, the average benefit was 55.5% pain relief (SD = 30.33%, range = 0-100%). Those who underwent conventional (vs pulsed radiofrequency) and who received prognostic blocks were more likely to experience a positive outcome. There were two cases of neuritis, which resolved spontaneously after several weeks.
Radiofrequency ablation of the sacrococcygeal nerves may serve as a useful treatment option for patients with coccydynia who have failed more conservative measures. Further research into this therapeutic approach and its benefit for coccydynia should incorporate a control group for comparison.
尾骨痛病因多样,治疗方法不明确。已有多项前瞻性研究,包括若干对照试验,对保守治疗进行了评估。此外,大量观察性研究评估了尾骨切除术,但很少有研究报告非手术介入治疗的结果。在本报告中,我们描述了12例接受传统或脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛患者的治疗结果,并系统回顾了相关治疗的文献。
我们进行了一项回顾性数据分析,评估在约翰霍普金斯医院和沃尔特里德国家军事医疗中心接受脉冲或传统射频治疗的患者。还进行了全面的文献综述,以将这些结果置于背景中。
接受治疗患者的平均年龄为50.25岁(标准差=11.20岁,范围=32 - 72岁),症状平均持续时间为3.6年(标准差=3.36年,范围1 - 10年)。该队列中有10名男性和2名女性。在接受射频治疗的患者中,平均疼痛缓解率为55.5%(标准差=30.33%,范围=0 - 100%)。接受传统(与脉冲射频相比)治疗且接受预后阻滞的患者更有可能获得积极结果。有2例神经炎,数周后自发缓解。
骶尾神经射频消融术可能是尾骨痛患者保守治疗失败后的一种有效治疗选择。对这种治疗方法及其对尾骨痛益处的进一步研究应纳入对照组进行比较。