Sternad Dagmar, Hasson Christopher J
Department of Biology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Physics, Northeastern University, 134 Mugar Life Science Building, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;957:55-77. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_4.
Manipulation of complex objects and tools is a hallmark of many activities of daily living, but how the human neuromotor control system interacts with such objects is not well understood. Even the seemingly simple task of transporting a cup of coffee without spilling creates complex interaction forces that humans need to compensate for. Predicting the behavior of an underactuated object with nonlinear fluid dynamics based on an internal model appears daunting. Hence, this research tests the hypothesis that humans learn strategies that make interactions predictable and robust to inaccuracies in neural representations of object dynamics. The task of moving a cup of coffee is modeled with a cart-and-pendulum system that is rendered in a virtual environment, where subjects interact with a virtual cup with a rolling ball inside using a robotic manipulandum. To gain insight into human control strategies, we operationalize predictability and robustness to permit quantitative theory-based assessment. Predictability is quantified by the mutual information between the applied force and the object dynamics; robustness is quantified by the energy margin away from failure. Three studies are reviewed that show how with practice subjects develop movement strategies that are predictable and robust. Alternative criteria, common for free movement, such as maximization of smoothness and minimization of force, do not account for the observed data. As manual dexterity is compromised in many individuals with neurological disorders, the experimental paradigm and its analyses are a promising platform to gain insights into neurological diseases, such as dystonia and multiple sclerosis, as well as healthy aging.
对复杂物体和工具的操作是许多日常生活活动的一个标志,但人类神经运动控制系统如何与这类物体相互作用尚不清楚。即使是看似简单的端着一杯咖啡且不洒出来的任务,也会产生人类需要补偿的复杂相互作用力。基于内部模型用非线性流体动力学预测欠驱动物体的行为似乎令人生畏。因此,本研究检验了这样一个假设:人类会学习使相互作用具有可预测性且对物体动力学神经表征中的不准确具有鲁棒性的策略。端一杯咖啡的任务用一个在虚拟环境中呈现的小车 - 摆系统进行建模,在该环境中,受试者使用机器人操作器与一个内部有滚动球的虚拟杯子进行交互。为了深入了解人类控制策略,我们将可预测性和鲁棒性进行量化,以便基于理论进行定量评估。可预测性通过施加力与物体动力学之间的互信息来量化;鲁棒性通过远离失效的能量裕度来量化。本文回顾了三项研究,这些研究表明随着练习,受试者会形成具有可预测性和鲁棒性的运动策略。自由运动常见的其他标准,如平滑度最大化和力最小化,并不能解释所观察到的数据。由于许多患有神经系统疾病的个体的手动灵活性会受到损害,该实验范式及其分析是一个有前景的平台,可用于深入了解诸如肌张力障碍和多发性硬化症等神经系统疾病以及健康衰老问题。