French Kathryn, Evans Jason, Tanner Hannah, Gossain Savita, Hussain Abid
Public Health England, Public Health Laboratory Birmingham, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169332. eCollection 2016.
Faster identification of bacterial isolates from blood cultures can enable earlier clinical intervention for patients with sepsis. We evaluated the clinical impact of direct identification of micro-organisms from positive blood cultures using MALDI-ToF.
Positive blood cultures with organisms seen on Gram stain were included over a four week period. For each patient case, comparison was made between the clinical advice given on day one with only a Gram stain result, and the follow up advice given on day two with the benefit of organism identification. Culture results were then compared with direct MALDI-ToF identification.
For 73 of 115 cases (63.5%), direct organism identification was obtained by MALDI-ToF. Of those 73, 70 (95.5%) had a result concordant with that of the plate culture. In 28 of the 115 cases (24.3%) direct MALDI-ToF identification on day one would have had a clear clinical benefit. In 11 cases it would have helped to identify the potential source of bacteraemia. In 11 cases it would have indicated a different antibiotic regimen on day one, with five patients receiving appropriate antibiotics 24 hours earlier. For 14 cases the blood culture isolate could have been designated as unlikely to be clinically significant.
We have demonstrated that organism identification on day one of blood culture positivity can have a direct clinical impact. Faster identification using MALDI-ToF assists the clinician in assessing the significance of a blood culture isolate on day one. It can allow earlier appropriate choice of antimicrobial agent, even in the absence of susceptibility testing, and help narrow down the potential source of infection providing a focus for further investigation in a more timely way than conventional techniques alone.
更快地从血培养中鉴定出细菌分离株能够使脓毒症患者更早地得到临床干预。我们评估了使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF)直接从阳性血培养物中鉴定微生物的临床影响。
纳入在四周时间内革兰染色可见微生物的阳性血培养物。对于每个患者病例,比较仅根据第一天的革兰染色结果给出的临床建议,以及第二天受益于微生物鉴定后给出的后续建议。然后将培养结果与MALDI-ToF直接鉴定结果进行比较。
在115例病例中的73例(63.5%)通过MALDI-ToF获得了直接的微生物鉴定结果。在这73例中,70例(95.5%)的结果与平板培养结果一致。在115例病例中的28例(24.3%),第一天进行MALDI-ToF直接鉴定会有明显的临床益处。在11例中,它有助于确定菌血症的潜在来源。在11例中,它会在第一天指示不同的抗生素治疗方案,有5名患者提前24小时接受了适当的抗生素治疗。对于14例病例,血培养分离株可能被判定为临床意义不大。
我们已经证明,在血培养阳性的第一天进行微生物鉴定会有直接的临床影响。使用MALDI-ToF更快地鉴定有助于临床医生在第一天评估血培养分离株的意义。即使在没有药敏试验的情况下,它也能使更早地选择合适的抗菌药物,并有助于缩小潜在的感染源范围,比单独使用传统技术更及时地为进一步调查提供重点。