Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1824-1837. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0825-y.
This paper discusses power and sample-size computation for likelihood ratio and Wald testing of the significance of covariate effects in latent class models. For both tests, asymptotic distributions can be used; that is, the test statistic can be assumed to follow a central Chi-square under the null hypothesis and a non-central Chi-square under the alternative hypothesis. Power or sample-size computation using these asymptotic distributions requires specification of the non-centrality parameter, which in practice is rarely known. We show how to calculate this non-centrality parameter using a large simulated data set from the model under the alternative hypothesis. A simulation study is conducted evaluating the adequacy of the proposed power analysis methods, determining the key study design factor affecting the power level, and comparing the performance of the likelihood ratio and Wald test. The proposed power analysis methods turn out to perform very well for a broad range of conditions. Moreover, apart from effect size and sample size, an important factor affecting the power is the class separation, implying that when class separation is low, rather large sample sizes are needed to achieve a reasonable power level.
本文讨论了似然比和 Wald 检验在潜在类别模型中协变量效应显著性的功效和样本量计算。对于这两种检验,都可以使用渐近分布;也就是说,在零假设下,检验统计量可以假定服从中心卡方分布,在备择假设下服从非中心卡方分布。使用这些渐近分布进行功效或样本量计算需要指定非中心参数,而在实践中,该参数很少已知。我们展示了如何使用替代假设下模型的大型模拟数据集来计算这个非中心参数。进行了一项模拟研究,评估了所提出的功效分析方法的充分性,确定了影响功效水平的关键研究设计因素,并比较了似然比检验和 Wald 检验的性能。结果表明,所提出的功效分析方法在广泛的条件下表现非常好。此外,除了效应大小和样本量外,影响功效的一个重要因素是类别分离,这意味着当类别分离较低时,需要较大的样本量才能达到合理的功效水平。