Ghasemi Amir, Stubig Timo, A Nasto Luigi, Ahmed Malik, Mehdian Hossein
Center for Spinal Studies, Queens Medical Center, Nottingham University, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Trauma Center, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):913-920. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4924-3. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
To investigate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment and occurrence of DJK/DJF.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective observational cohort study.
The sample included 40 patients who underwent posterior correction of SK from January 2006 to December 2014.
Correlation analysis between the preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment parameters and development of DJK over the course of the study period were studied.
Whole spine X-rays obtained before surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the latest follow-up were analyzed. The following parameters were measured: maximum of thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and LIV plumb line. Development of DJK was considered as the primary end point of the study. The patient population was split into a control and DJK group, with 34 patients and 6 patients, respectively. Statistic analysis was performed using unpaired t test for normal contribution and Mann-Whitney test for skew distributed values. The significance level was set to 0.05.
DJK occurred in 15% (n = 6) over the study period. There was a significantly lower postoperative TK for the group with DJK (42.4 ± 5.3 vs 49.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.015). LIV plumb line showed higher negative values in the DJK group (-43.6 ± 25.1 vs -2.2 ± 17.8, p = 0.0435). Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.) CONCLUSIONS: SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. In addition, there may be a higher risk for DJK in patients undergoing corrective surgery at a younger age.
探讨术前与术后脊柱骨盆矢状面排列与下腰椎交界性后凸/下腰椎退变的发生之间的关系。
研究设计/地点:这是一项回顾性观察队列研究。
样本包括2006年1月至2014年12月期间接受脊柱后凸后路矫正术的40例患者。
研究术前与术后脊柱骨盆矢状面排列参数与研究期间下腰椎交界性后凸发生情况之间的相关性分析。
分析术前、术后3个月及最近一次随访时获得的全脊柱X线片。测量以下参数:胸椎后凸角最大值(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、矢状垂直轴(SVA)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、下固定椎(LIV)及LIV铅垂线。下腰椎交界性后凸的发生被视为研究的主要终点。将患者人群分为对照组和下腰椎交界性后凸组,分别有34例和6例患者。对正态分布数据采用独立样本t检验,对偏态分布数据采用Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。显著性水平设定为0.05。
在研究期间,15%(n = 6)的患者发生了下腰椎交界性后凸。下腰椎交界性后凸组术后TK显著更低(42.4±5.3对49.8±6.7,p = 0.015)。下腰椎交界性后凸组LIV铅垂线显示出更高的负值(-43.6±25.1对-2.2±17.8,p = 0.0435)。此外,下腰椎交界性后凸组术后LL变化更低(33.84±13.86%对31.77±14.05,p < 0.0001)。发生下腰椎交界性后凸的患者年龄也显著低于对照组(16.8±1.7对19.6±4.9,p = 0.0024)。结论:发生下腰椎交界性后凸的脊柱后凸患者似乎有显著更高程度的TK矫正和更负的LIV铅垂线。此外,年龄较小的患者接受矫正手术时发生下腰椎交界性后凸的风险可能更高。