Premaratne Manuja, Shamsaei Mohabbat, Chow Jonathan D H, Haddad Tony, Erthal Fernanda, Curran Helen, Yam Yeung, Szczotka Agnieszka, Mielniczuk Lisa, Wells George A, Beanlands Rob S, Hossain Alomgir, Chow Benjamin J W
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Canada; Frankston Hospital, Department of Medicine, Frankston, Australia.
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Canada.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:518-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.068. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
Preliminary data suggests the absence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) excludes ischemic etiologies of cardiomyopathy. We prospectively validate and perform a systematic review to determine the utility of an Agatston score=0 to exclude the diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Patients with newly diagnosed LV dysfunction were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent CAC imaging and were followed until an etiologic diagnosis of cardiomyopathy was made. Eighty-two patients were enrolled in the study and underwent CAC imaging with 81.7% patients having non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. An Agatston score=0 successfully excluded an ischemic etiology for cardiomyopathy with a specificity of 100% (CI: 74.7-100%) and a positive predictive value of 100% (CI: 85.0%-100%). A systematic literature review was performed and studies were deemed suitable for inclusion if: 1) patients with CHF, cardiomyopathy or LV dysfunction were enrolled, 2) underwent CAC imaging and patients were assessed for an Agatston score=0 or the absence of CAC, and 3) the final etiologic diagnosis (ischemic or non-ischemic) was provided. Eight studies provided sufficient information to calculate operating characteristics for an Agatston score=0 and were combined with our validation cohort for a total of 754 patients. An Agatston score=0 excluded ischemic cardiomyopathy with specificity and positive predictive values of 98.4% (CI: 95.6-99.5%), and 98.3% (CI: 95.5-99.5%), respectively.
In patients with cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology, an Agatston score=0 appears to rule out an ischemic etiology. A screening CAC may be a simple and cost-effective method of triaging patients, identifying those who do and do not need additional CAD investigations.
初步数据表明,无冠状动脉钙化(CAC)可排除心肌病的缺血性病因。我们进行前瞻性验证并开展系统评价,以确定阿加斯顿评分=0在排除缺血性心肌病诊断方面的效用。
前瞻性纳入新诊断为左心室功能障碍的患者。患者接受CAC成像检查,并随访至做出心肌病的病因诊断。82例患者纳入本研究并接受CAC成像检查,81.7%的患者患有非缺血性心肌病。阿加斯顿评分=0成功排除了心肌病的缺血性病因,特异性为100%(可信区间:74.7 - 100%),阳性预测值为100%(可信区间:85.0% - 100%)。进行了系统的文献综述,若研究符合以下条件则被认为适合纳入:1)纳入了心力衰竭、心肌病或左心室功能障碍患者;2)接受了CAC成像检查,并对患者进行了阿加斯顿评分=0或无CAC的评估;3)提供了最终病因诊断(缺血性或非缺血性)。八项研究提供了足够信息来计算阿加斯顿评分=0的操作特征,并与我们的验证队列合并,共计754例患者。阿加斯顿评分=0排除缺血性心肌病的特异性和阳性预测值分别为98.4%(可信区间:95.6 - 99.5%)和98.3%(可信区间:95.5 - 99.5%)。
在病因不明的心肌病患者中,阿加斯顿评分=0似乎可排除缺血性病因。筛查CAC可能是一种简单且经济有效的患者分流方法,可识别出那些需要和不需要额外冠心病检查的患者。