• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multivariable Regression Model of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire in Patients Seeking Outpatient Low Vision Rehabilitation.寻求门诊低视力康复患者的欧洲五维健康量表多变量回归模型
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;24(3):174-180. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1257027. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to the effects of low vision rehabilitation.EQ-5D对低视力康复效果的反应性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):799-805. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000005.
3
Visual and health outcomes, measured with the activity inventory and the EQ-5D, in visual impairment.采用活动量表和EQ-5D测量的视力损害患者的视觉和健康结局。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;95(8):e783-e791. doi: 10.1111/aos.13430. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Visual ability of patients seeking outpatient low vision services in the United States.在美国寻求门诊低视力服务的患者的视觉能力。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;132(10):1169-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1747.
5
Clinically Meaningful Rehabilitation Outcomes of Low Vision Patients Served by Outpatient Clinical Centers.门诊临床中心为低视力患者提供的具有临床意义的康复结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;133(7):762-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0693.
6
The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).生活质量效用工具在抑郁症变化中的反应性:工具比较(SF-6D、EQ-5D 和 DFD)。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 May 6.
7
Catalog and comparison of societal preferences (utilities) for lung cancer health states: results from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study.肺癌健康状态的社会偏好(效用)分类与比较:癌症护理结果研究与监测(CanCORS)研究的结果
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):371-87. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15570364. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Quality of life and participation of young adults with a visual impairment aged 18-25 years: comparison with population norms.18-25 岁视力障碍的年轻成年人的生活质量和参与度:与人口正常值的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):165-172. doi: 10.1111/aos.13903. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Does quality of life of COPD patients as measured by the generic EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire differentiate between COPD severity stages?采用通用的欧洲五维健康量表问卷测量的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的生活质量能否区分COPD的严重程度阶段?
Chest. 2006 Oct;130(4):1117-28. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.4.1117.
10
Comparison of clinician-predicted to measured low vision outcomes.临床医生预测的低视力结果与测量结果的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):776-87. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31829d99d1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal.基础视觉康复服务效果研究:葡萄牙低视力康复的临床试验结果与成本效益
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):307-323. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00600-0. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
2
Health-related quality of life among adult patients with visual impairments in Yazd, Iran.伊朗亚兹德成年视力障碍患者的健康相关生活质量
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jul 29;11:242. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1444_21. eCollection 2022.
3
Predictors of problems reported on the EQ-5D-3L dimensions among people with impaired vision in northern Portugal.葡萄牙北部视力障碍人群在 EQ-5D-3L 维度上报告问题的预测因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Sep 6;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02043-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinically Meaningful Rehabilitation Outcomes of Low Vision Patients Served by Outpatient Clinical Centers.门诊临床中心为低视力患者提供的具有临床意义的康复结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;133(7):762-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0693.
2
Visual ability of patients seeking outpatient low vision services in the United States.在美国寻求门诊低视力服务的患者的视觉能力。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;132(10):1169-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1747.
3
Characterizing functional complaints in patients seeking outpatient low-vision services in the United States.对美国寻求门诊低视力服务的患者的功能障碍主诉进行特征描述。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1655-62.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Comparison of clinician-predicted to measured low vision outcomes.临床医生预测的低视力结果与测量结果的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):776-87. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31829d99d1.
5
Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to the effects of low vision rehabilitation.EQ-5D对低视力康复效果的反应性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):799-805. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000005.
6
A comparison of the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and TTO utility values to changes in vision and perceived visual function in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼患者的 EQ-5D、SF-6D 和 TTO 效用值与视力变化及感知视觉功能变化的敏感性比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 21;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-43.
7
Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States.美国私立门诊临床中心服务的低视力患者的基线特征。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;130(8):1028-37. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1197.
8
A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders.视觉障碍相关健康相关生活质量的通用偏好测量的综述。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
9
The impact of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema on health-related quality of life in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 13;53(2):677-84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8992.
10
How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review.低视力服务提供的效果如何?系统评价。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):34-65. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

寻求门诊低视力康复患者的欧洲五维健康量表多变量回归模型

Multivariable Regression Model of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire in Patients Seeking Outpatient Low Vision Rehabilitation.

作者信息

Malkin Alexis G, Goldstein Judith E, Massof Robert W

机构信息

a New England College of Optometry , Boston , MA , USA.

b Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;24(3):174-180. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1257027. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1080/09286586.2016.1257027
PMID:28045563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6746571/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To understand the source of between-person variance in baseline health utilities estimated from EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) responses of a representative sample of the US low vision outpatient population prior to rehabilitation.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study of 779 new low vision patients at 28 clinic centers in the US. The EQ-5D, Activity Inventory (AI), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical functioning component, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were administered by telephone interview prior to rehabilitation. EQ-5D responses were transformed into health utilities, which served as the dependent variable in all analyses. Data were then analyzed to determine how much overall visual ability, functional domains of visual ability, and comorbidities (e.g. physical functioning, depression, cognition) independently contribute to the EQ-5D-based health utility index.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analyses showed that the GDS and SF-36 physical account for nearly 40% of the variance observed in health utilities estimated from EQ-5D responses of low vision patients. Age was also a significant predictor of health utilities, but accounted for very little variance. None of the other variables were significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Health utilities of low vision patients estimated from the EQ-5D primarily are associated with comorbid factors that are not likely to be responsive to low vision rehabilitation, thereby rendering the EQ-5D an unsuitable outcome measure for this population. However, because the EQ-5D is responsive to comorbid states, it could be a useful tool for evaluating the impact of comorbidities on low vision patient quality of life.

摘要

目的

了解在美国低视力门诊康复前代表性样本中,根据欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D)反应估计的个体间基线健康效用差异的来源。

方法

对美国28个诊所中心的779名新的低视力患者进行前瞻性观察研究。在康复前通过电话访谈进行欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D)、活动量表(AI)、认知状态电话访谈(TICS)、医学结局研究36项简短健康调查(SF - 36)身体功能部分以及老年抑郁量表(GDS)的评估。EQ - 5D反应被转换为健康效用,其作为所有分析中的因变量。然后对数据进行分析,以确定整体视觉能力、视觉能力功能域以及合并症(如身体功能、抑郁、认知)如何独立地对基于EQ - 5D的健康效用指数产生影响。

结果

多变量回归分析表明,老年抑郁量表(GDS)和SF - 36身体功能部分占低视力患者EQ - 5D反应估计的健康效用中观察到的近40%的差异。年龄也是健康效用的一个显著预测因素,但占差异的比例非常小。其他变量均不是显著的预测因素。

结论

根据EQ - 5D估计的低视力患者的健康效用主要与不太可能对低视力康复有反应的合并症因素相关,从而使得EQ - 5D不适用于该人群的结局测量。然而,由于EQ - 5D对合并症状态有反应,它可能是评估合并症对低视力患者生活质量影响的有用工具。