Nascimento Marcelle M, Behar-Horenstein Linda S, Feng Xiaoying, Guzmán-Armstrong Sandra, Fontana Margherita
Dr. Nascimento is Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida; Dr. Behar-Horenstein is Distinguished Teaching Scholar and Professor, Colleges of Dentistry, Education, Veterinary Medicine, and Pharmacy, as well as being Director, CTSI Educational Development and Evaluation and Co-Director, HRSA Faculty Development in Dentistry, University of Florida; Ms. Feng is a doctoral candidate, School of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education, College of Education, University of Florida; Dr. Guzmán-Armstrong is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; and Dr. Fontana is Professor, Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan.
J Dent Educ. 2017 Jan;81(1):5-13.
Approaches for managing carious tissues during cavity preparations vary considerably among clinicians, which may reflect inconsistencies in the teaching of this subject by dental schools. The aims of this study were to investigate practices related to the preclinical and clinical teaching of caries removal at U.S. dental schools and the relationship between that teaching and requirements for U.S. dental licensure examinations. The electronic survey included questions about terminology, methods, instruments and materials, treatment planning, criteria for clinical exams, faculty calibration sessions, and licensure exams. The faculty members at U.S. dental schools responsible for teaching cariology were invited to participate; 54 of the 65 schools had identified a contact person at the time of the survey in October 2015. Of those 54 invited to participate, 43 completed the survey (response rate of 79.6%). Most of the respondents indicated that depth of carious lesions was a clinical determinant of the amount of carious dentin being removed in cavity preparations. Caries removal was used as a criterion in restorative clinical examinations by 95% of responding schools. Marked differences were observed regarding the criteria used for assessment and removal of carious tissues, management of deep carious lesions, and definition of "caries remaining at cavity preparations," which is considered a critical error on licensure exams. Faculty calibration sessions on caries removal were reported to occur in 65% of these schools and at different time frames. Overall, the study found a wide range of teaching practices related to caries removal. Best evidence in caries management needs to be aligned with teaching and the criteria used to calibrate faculty members and examiners.
在窝洞预备过程中,临床医生处理龋坏组织的方法差异很大,这可能反映出牙科学院在该学科教学上的不一致。本研究的目的是调查美国牙科学院龋病去除的临床前和临床教学相关实践,以及该教学与美国牙科执照考试要求之间的关系。电子调查问卷包括有关术语、方法、器械和材料、治疗计划、临床考试标准、教员校准课程和执照考试的问题。邀请了美国牙科学院负责讲授龋病学的教员参与;在2015年10月调查时,65所学校中有54所确定了联系人。在受邀参与的54人中,43人完成了调查(回复率为79.6%)。大多数受访者表示,龋损深度是窝洞预备中去除龋坏牙本质量的临床决定因素。95%的回复学校将龋病去除用作修复临床考试的标准。在龋病组织评估和去除的标准、深龋病变的处理以及“窝洞预备时残留龋”的定义方面存在明显差异,“窝洞预备时残留龋”在执照考试中被视为严重错误。据报告,65%的这些学校在不同时间段举办了龋病去除教员校准课程。总体而言,该研究发现与龋病去除相关的教学实践范围广泛。龋病管理的最佳证据需要与教学以及用于校准教员和考官的标准保持一致。