Suppr超能文献

使用各种固定方式进行前交叉韧带重建后股骨和胫骨隧道增宽:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Various Modalities of Fixation: A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Srinivas Dileep Krishnamoorthy, Kanthila Mahesha, Saya Rama Prakasha, Vidyasagar Jvs

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Deparatment of Orthopaedics, K.S.Hegde Medical Academy , Mangalore, Karnataka, India .

Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Mangalore, Karnataka, India .

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):RC09-RC11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22660.8907. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bone tunnel enlargement after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) is a well-accepted phenomenon but there are very few published data comparing the extent of tunnel widening by various methods of fixation after ACL-R.

AIM

To compare the femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL-R with different methods of fixation using CT scan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This one year prospective study included all patients with chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL-R using tripled hamstring tendon autograft. The graft was fixed to the tibial tunnel by Interference Screw (IFS) or Suture Disc (SD) and to the femoral tunnel by IFS, SD, Cross-Pin (CP) or Endo-button CL (Smith & Nephew). The widening of the tibial and femoral tunnels in different methods of fixation was assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at 12 months follow-up; and was compared using paired sample test.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included in the study of which 58 (92%) were males and 5 (8%) were females, with a mean age of 29.1 ± 5.9 years. The tibial tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.680 ± 1.08794 (19.37%) and 1.517 ± 0.94834 mm (17.39%) by IFS and SD methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.294 ± 0.231, 1.809 ± 0.912, 1.320 ± 0.238, 1.779 ± 0.889 mm by IFS, SD, EB, and CP methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening following suture disc method of fixation was very highly significant (p<0.001) in comparison with other methods.

CONCLUSION

Femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel widening varies with different methods of fixation and was maximum with suture disc method compared to others at one year follow-up after ACL-R.

摘要

引言

前交叉韧带重建术(ACL-R)后骨隧道扩大是一种公认的现象,但关于ACL-R后不同固定方法导致的隧道扩大程度的已发表数据非常少。

目的

使用CT扫描比较ACL-R后采用不同固定方法时股骨和胫骨隧道的扩大情况。

材料与方法

这项为期一年的前瞻性研究纳入了所有慢性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤且接受初次关节镜下ACL-R手术并使用自体腘绳肌腱三联移植的患者。移植物通过干涉螺钉(IFS)或缝线盘(SD)固定于胫骨隧道,通过IFS、SD、交叉针(CP)或Endo-button CL(史赛克公司)固定于股骨隧道。在随访12个月时通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估不同固定方法下胫骨和股骨隧道的扩大情况;并采用配对样本检验进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入63例患者,其中58例(92%)为男性,5例(8%)为女性,平均年龄为29.1±5.9岁。随访一年时,IFS和SD方法导致的胫骨隧道扩大分别为1.680±1.08794(19.37%)和1.517±0.94834mm(17.39%)。随访一年时,IFS、SD、EB和CP方法导致的股骨隧道扩大分别为1.294±0.231、1.809±0.912、1.320±0.238、1.779±0.889mm。与其他方法相比,缝线盘固定法导致的股骨隧道扩大非常显著(p<0.001)。

结论

ACL-R术后一年随访时,股骨和胫骨隧道扩大因固定方法不同而有所差异,与其他方法相比,缝线盘法导致的扩大最大。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Impact of measurement error in the analysis of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1680-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546505275489. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验