Srinivas Dileep Krishnamoorthy, Kanthila Mahesha, Saya Rama Prakasha, Vidyasagar Jvs
Assistant Professor, Deparatment of Orthopaedics, K.S.Hegde Medical Academy , Mangalore, Karnataka, India .
Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Mangalore, Karnataka, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):RC09-RC11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22660.8907. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Bone tunnel enlargement after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) is a well-accepted phenomenon but there are very few published data comparing the extent of tunnel widening by various methods of fixation after ACL-R.
To compare the femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL-R with different methods of fixation using CT scan.
This one year prospective study included all patients with chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL-R using tripled hamstring tendon autograft. The graft was fixed to the tibial tunnel by Interference Screw (IFS) or Suture Disc (SD) and to the femoral tunnel by IFS, SD, Cross-Pin (CP) or Endo-button CL (Smith & Nephew). The widening of the tibial and femoral tunnels in different methods of fixation was assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at 12 months follow-up; and was compared using paired sample test.
A total of 63 patients were included in the study of which 58 (92%) were males and 5 (8%) were females, with a mean age of 29.1 ± 5.9 years. The tibial tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.680 ± 1.08794 (19.37%) and 1.517 ± 0.94834 mm (17.39%) by IFS and SD methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.294 ± 0.231, 1.809 ± 0.912, 1.320 ± 0.238, 1.779 ± 0.889 mm by IFS, SD, EB, and CP methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening following suture disc method of fixation was very highly significant (p<0.001) in comparison with other methods.
Femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel widening varies with different methods of fixation and was maximum with suture disc method compared to others at one year follow-up after ACL-R.
前交叉韧带重建术(ACL-R)后骨隧道扩大是一种公认的现象,但关于ACL-R后不同固定方法导致的隧道扩大程度的已发表数据非常少。
使用CT扫描比较ACL-R后采用不同固定方法时股骨和胫骨隧道的扩大情况。
这项为期一年的前瞻性研究纳入了所有慢性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤且接受初次关节镜下ACL-R手术并使用自体腘绳肌腱三联移植的患者。移植物通过干涉螺钉(IFS)或缝线盘(SD)固定于胫骨隧道,通过IFS、SD、交叉针(CP)或Endo-button CL(史赛克公司)固定于股骨隧道。在随访12个月时通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估不同固定方法下胫骨和股骨隧道的扩大情况;并采用配对样本检验进行比较。
本研究共纳入63例患者,其中58例(92%)为男性,5例(8%)为女性,平均年龄为29.1±5.9岁。随访一年时,IFS和SD方法导致的胫骨隧道扩大分别为1.680±1.08794(19.37%)和1.517±0.94834mm(17.39%)。随访一年时,IFS、SD、EB和CP方法导致的股骨隧道扩大分别为1.294±0.231、1.809±0.912、1.320±0.238、1.779±0.889mm。与其他方法相比,缝线盘固定法导致的股骨隧道扩大非常显著(p<0.001)。
ACL-R术后一年随访时,股骨和胫骨隧道扩大因固定方法不同而有所差异,与其他方法相比,缝线盘法导致的扩大最大。