• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮胆囊造瘘术后一周内可安全停用抗生素。

Antibiotics May be Safely Discontinued Within One Week of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.

作者信息

Loftus Tyler J, Brakenridge Scott C, Dessaigne Camille G, Sarosi George A, Zingarelli William J, Moore Frederick A, Jordan Janeen R, Croft Chasen A, Smith R Stephen, Efron Phillip A, Mohr Alicia M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100108, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.

University of Florida Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1239-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3861-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-016-3861-y
PMID:28050668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5395343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with acute cholecystitis managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), the optimal duration of post-procedural antibiotic therapy is unknown. Our objective was to compare short versus long courses of antibiotics with the hypothesis that patients with persistent signs of systemic inflammation 72 h following PC would receive prolonged antibiotic therapy and that antibiotic duration would not affect outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 81 patients who underwent PC for acute cholecystitis at two hospitals during a 41-month period ending November 2014. Patients who received short (≤7 day) courses of post-procedural antibiotics were compared to patients who received long (>7 day) courses. Treatment response to PC was evaluated by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Logistic and linear regressions were used to evaluate associations between antibiotic duration and outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who received short (n = 30) and long courses (n = 51) of antibiotics had similar age, comorbidities, severity of cholecystitis, pre-procedural vital signs, treatment response, and culture results. There were no differences in recurrent cholecystitis (13 vs. 12%), requirement for open/converted to open cholecystectomy (23 vs. 22%), or 1-year mortality (20 vs. 18%). On logistic and linear regressions, antibiotic duration as a continuous variable was not predictive of any salient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received short and long courses of post-PC antibiotics had similar baseline characteristics and outcomes. Antibiotic duration did not predict recurrent cholecystitis, interval open cholecystectomy, or mortality. These findings suggest that antibiotics may be safely discontinued within one week of uncomplicated PC.

摘要

背景

对于采用经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC)治疗的急性胆囊炎患者,术后抗生素治疗的最佳疗程尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗,假设PC术后72小时仍有全身炎症持续体征的患者将接受延长的抗生素治疗,且抗生素疗程不会影响治疗结果。

方法

我们对2014年11月结束的41个月期间在两家医院接受PC治疗急性胆囊炎的81例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。将接受短疗程(≤7天)术后抗生素治疗的患者与接受长疗程(>7天)治疗的患者进行比较。通过全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准评估对PC的治疗反应。采用逻辑回归和线性回归评估抗生素疗程与治疗结果之间的关联。

结果

接受短疗程(n = 30)和长疗程(n = 51)抗生素治疗的患者在年龄、合并症、胆囊炎严重程度、术前生命体征、治疗反应和培养结果方面相似。复发性胆囊炎(13%对12%)、开腹/转为开腹胆囊切除术的需求(23%对22%)或1年死亡率(20%对18%)方面无差异。在逻辑回归和线性回归中,抗生素疗程作为连续变量不能预测任何显著的治疗结果。

结论

接受PC术后短疗程和长疗程抗生素治疗的患者具有相似的基线特征和治疗结果。抗生素疗程不能预测复发性胆囊炎、间隔期开腹胆囊切除术或死亡率。这些发现表明,在无并发症的PC术后一周内可安全停用抗生素。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics May be Safely Discontinued Within One Week of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术后一周内可安全停用抗生素。
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1239-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3861-y.
2
Percutaneous cholecystostomy: prognostic factors and comparison to cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造口术:预后因素及与胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4568-4575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5517-x. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Early percutaneous cholecystostomy versus antibiotic treatment for mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: A retrospective cohort study.早期经皮胆囊造口术与抗生素治疗轻中度急性胆囊炎的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):914-921. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术后进行常规监测胆管造影会延迟引流管拔除和胆囊切除术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):351-355. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001315.
5
Comparison of cholecystectomy and percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis: results of a retrospective study.胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较:一项回顾性研究的结果。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Oct;21(20):4668-4674.
6
Clinical and operative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis who are treated initially with image-guided cholecystostomy.初始接受影像引导下胆囊造瘘术治疗的急性胆囊炎患者的临床及手术结局
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):195-199. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003517.
7
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis-Predictors of Recurrence and Interval Cholecystectomy.急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造瘘术——复发及择期胆囊切除术的预测因素
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.051. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
The management of acute cholecystitis in chronic hemodialysis patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus cholecystectomy.慢性血液透析患者急性胆囊炎的治疗:经皮胆囊造口术与胆囊切除术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2067-3. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
9
Cholecystectomy Vs. Cholecystostomy for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly Patients.胆囊切除术与胆囊造口术治疗老年急性胆囊炎。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3863-1. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
What is the ideal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis?经皮胆囊造瘘术后急性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术的理想时机是什么?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8764-8770. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10332-2. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The fate of patients managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗急性胆囊炎患者的预后。
Surgery. 2016 May;159(5):1479-80. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.034. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
2
Financial evaluations of antibiotic stewardship programs-a systematic review.抗生素管理项目的财务评估:系统评价。
Front Microbiol. 2015 Apr 16;6:317. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00317. eCollection 2015.
3
Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective definitive treatment option for acute acalculous cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术是急性非结石性胆囊炎的一种有效的确定性治疗选择。
Scand J Surg. 2015 Dec;104(4):238-43. doi: 10.1177/1457496914564107. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery.高危急性胆囊炎患者保守性经皮胆囊造瘘术的结局及导致手术的危险因素
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2359-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3961-4. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
5
Technique and indications of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of cholecystitis in 2014.2014年经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗胆囊炎的技术与适应症
J Visc Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
6
Effect of postoperative antibiotic administration on postoperative infection following cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a randomized clinical trial.术后抗生素应用对急性结石性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术术后感染的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):145-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7586.
7
Biliary microflora in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.接受胆囊切除术患者的胆汁微生物群
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):262-5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.125. Epub 2014 May 6.
8
Effect of antibiotic stewardship programmes on Clostridium difficile incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素管理计划对艰难梭菌发病率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jul;69(7):1748-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku046. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
9
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy.经皮胆囊造口术治疗合并症高的急性胆囊炎患者及再评估治疗效果。
Surgery. 2014 Apr;155(4):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
10
New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo Guidelines.修订版东京指南中的急性胆囊炎新诊断标准和严重程度评估。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):578-85. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0548-0.