Suppr超能文献

在纠正对测试结果的不依从性后,被动抬腿试验可有效减少感染性休克患者的液体输注量。

Passive leg raise testing effectively reduces fluid administration in septic shock after correction of non-compliance to test results.

作者信息

Rameau Arjanne, de With Eldert, Boerma Evert Christiaan

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henrie Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0225-6. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluid resuscitation is considered a cornerstone of shock treatment, but recent data have underlined the potential hazards of fluid overload. The passive leg raise (PLR) test has been introduced as one of many strategies to predict 'fluid responsiveness.' The use of PLR testing is applicable to a wide range of clinical situations and has the potential to reduce fluid administration, since PLR testing is based upon (reversible) autotransfusion. Despite these theoretical advantages, data on the net effect on fluid balance as a result of PLR testing remain scarce.

METHODS

We performed a prospective single-center multi-step interventional study in patients with septic shock to evaluate the effect of implementation of PLR testing on the fluid balance (FB) 48 hours after ICU admission. All patients were equipped with a PiCCO device for pulse contour analysis to guide fluid administration. An increase in stroke volume (SV) ≥ 10% was considered a positive test result.

RESULTS

Before introduction of PLR testing, 21 patients were prospectively included in period 1 with a median FB of 4.8 [3.3-7.8]L. After an extensive training program, PLR testing was introduced and 20 patients were included in period 2. Median FB was 4.4 [3.3-7.5]L and did not differ from period 1 (p = 0.72). Further analysis revealed that non-compliance to the PLR test result was 44%. These findings were discussed with all ICU doctors and nurses. By consensus, non-compliance to the PLR test result was identified as the main reason for unsuccessful implementation of PLR testing. After this evaluation, 19 patients were included in period 3 under equal conditions as in period 2. In this period, median FB was 3.1 [1.5-4.9]L and significantly reduced in comparison with periods 1 and 2 (p = 0.016 and p = 0.023, respectively). Non-compliance was 9% and significantly lower than in period 2 (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of PLR testing in patients with septic shock reduced fluid administration in the first 48 hours of ICU admission significantly and substantially. To achieve this endpoint, substantial non-compliance of ICU team members had to be addressed. Fluid administration despite a negative PLR test was the most common form of non-compliance.

摘要

背景

液体复苏被视为休克治疗的基石,但近期数据强调了液体超负荷的潜在危害。被动抬腿(PLR)试验已作为预测“液体反应性”的众多策略之一被引入。PLR试验的应用适用于广泛的临床情况,并且由于PLR试验基于(可逆的)自体输血,因此有减少液体输注的潜力。尽管有这些理论优势,但关于PLR试验对液体平衡的净效应的数据仍然稀少。

方法

我们对感染性休克患者进行了一项前瞻性单中心多步骤干预研究,以评估实施PLR试验对重症监护病房(ICU)入院后48小时液体平衡(FB)的影响。所有患者均配备脉搏轮廓分析的PiCCO设备以指导液体输注。每搏输出量(SV)增加≥10%被视为阳性试验结果。

结果

在引入PLR试验之前,21例患者前瞻性纳入第1阶段,中位FB为4.8[3.3 - 7.8]L。经过广泛的培训计划后,引入了PLR试验,20例患者纳入第2阶段。中位FB为4.4[3.3 - 7.5]L,与第1阶段无差异(p = 0.72)。进一步分析显示,对PLR试验结果的不依从率为44%。这些结果与所有ICU医生和护士进行了讨论。经共识,对PLR试验结果的不依从被确定为PLR试验实施不成功的主要原因。经过此评估,19例患者在与第2阶段相同的条件下纳入第3阶段。在此阶段,中位FB为3.1[1.5 - 4.9]L,与第1阶段和第2阶段相比显著降低(分别为p = 0.016和p = 0.023)。不依从率为9%,显著低于第2阶段(p = 0.009)。

结论

在感染性休克患者中实施PLR试验在ICU入院后的头48小时内显著且实质性地减少了液体输注。为达到这一终点,必须解决ICU团队成员的严重不依从问题。尽管PLR试验结果为阴性仍进行液体输注是最常见的不依从形式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa24/5209308/308a55f0726a/13613_2016_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验