Suppr超能文献

双指数和单指数扩散加权成像在评估透明细胞肾细胞癌Fuhrman分级中的比较

Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Shen Lijuan, Zhou Liangping, Liu Xiaohang, Yang Xiaoqun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;23(2):100-105. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15519.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common primary malignant urologic tumor. The Fuhrman grading system is an independent indicator for aggressiveness and prognosis of ccRCC. We aimed to assess the possible diagnostic role of biexponentially and monoexponentially fitted signal attenuation for the Fuhrman grading.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients with ccRCC underwent multiple b values (0, 20, 50, 100, 150, 250, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Biexponential parameters (fast ADC [ADCf], slow ADC [ADCs], and fraction of ADCf [f]) and monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient were calculated, and correlated with the Fuhrman grade of ccRCC respectively. The performance of biexponential parameters in differentiating Fuhrman low- and high-grade tumors was assessed and compared with ADC value by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Qualified images and diffusion-weighted parameters were obtained for all patients. The ADCf and f value were positively correlated, whereas ADCs and ADC value were negatively correlated with Fuhrman grade. Significant differences were observed in ADCf (P < 0.001), ADCs (P = 0.005), and f values (P < 0.001) of high- and low-grade ccRCCs. When differentiating Fuhrman low-grade tumors from high-grade, the ADCf revealed an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.959, which was higher than the ADC value (0.789; P = 0.046), while ADCs (0.807) and f (0.833) showed no significant difference from ADC (P = 0.85 for ADCs, P = 0.73 for f).

CONCLUSION

Biexponential DWI provides additional parameters for ccRCC. ADCf is more accurate compared with the ADC value in characterizing Fuhrman grade of ccRCC.

摘要

目的

透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)是最常见的原发性泌尿系统恶性肿瘤。富尔曼分级系统是ccRCC侵袭性和预后的独立指标。我们旨在评估双指数和单指数拟合信号衰减对富尔曼分级的可能诊断作用。

方法

33例ccRCC患者接受了多个b值(0、20、50、100、150、250、400、600、800、1000 s/mm2)的扩散加权成像(DWI)。计算双指数参数(快速表观扩散系数[ADCf]、慢速表观扩散系数[ADCs]和ADCf分数[f])和单指数表观扩散系数,并分别与ccRCC的富尔曼分级相关。通过受试者工作特征分析评估双指数参数在区分富尔曼低级别和高级别肿瘤中的性能,并与ADC值进行比较。

结果

所有患者均获得了合格的图像和扩散加权参数。ADCf和f值呈正相关,而ADCs和ADC值与富尔曼分级呈负相关。高级别和低级别ccRCC的ADCf(P < 0.001)、ADCs(P = 0.005)和f值(P < 0.001)存在显著差异。在区分富尔曼低级别肿瘤和高级别肿瘤时,ADCf的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.959,高于ADC值(0.789;P = 0.046),而ADCs(0.807)和f(0.833)与ADC无显著差异(ADCs的P = 0.85,f的P = 0.73)。

结论

双指数DWI为ccRCC提供了额外的参数。在表征ccRCC的富尔曼分级方面,ADCf比ADC值更准确。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?肾癌的MRI表型:其在临床上有相关性吗?
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;23(2):95-115. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000019.
6
Subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: MRI and pathological features.肾细胞癌的亚型:MRI 和病理特征。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):304-11. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.147.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验