• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散加权成像单指数、双指数、拉伸指数和峰度模型在肾脏实性肿块鉴别诊断中的比较。

Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2019 May;20(5):791-800. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0474.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2018.0474
PMID:30993930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6470087/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare various models of diffusion-weighted imaging including monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), biexponential (fast diffusion coefficient [D], slow diffusion coefficient [D], and fraction of fast diffusion), stretched-exponential (distributed diffusion coefficient and anomalous exponent term [α]), and kurtosis (mean diffusivity and mean kurtosis [MK]) models in the differentiation of renal solid masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 81 patients (56 men and 25 women; mean age, 57 years; age range, 30-69 years) with 18 benign and 63 malignant lesions were imaged using 3T diffusion-weighted MRI. Diffusion model selection was investigated in each lesion using the Akaike information criteria. Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical evaluations.

RESULTS

Goodness-of-fit analysis showed that the stretched-exponential model had the highest voxel percentages in benign and malignant lesions (90.7% and 51.4%, respectively). ADC, D, and MK showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions ( < 0.05) and between low- and high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) ( < 0.05). α was significantly lower in the benign group than in the malignant group ( < 0.05). All diffusion measures showed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC ( < 0.05) except D and α ( = 0.143 and 0.112, respectively). α showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant lesions with an area under the ROC curve of 0.923, but none of the parameters from these advanced models revealed significantly better performance over ADC in discriminating subtypes or grades of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional diffusion parameters, α may provide additional information for differentiating benign and malignant renal masses, while ADC remains the most valuable parameter for differentiation of RCC subtypes and for ccRCC grading.

摘要

目的

比较各种扩散加权成像模型,包括单指数表观扩散系数(ADC)、双指数(快扩散系数[D]、慢扩散系数[D]和快扩散分数)、拉伸指数(分布扩散系数和异常指数项[α])和峰度(平均扩散系数和平均峰度[MK])模型,以区分肾脏实性肿块。

材料与方法

共对 81 例患者(男 56 例,女 25 例;平均年龄 57 岁;年龄范围 30-69 岁)的 18 个良性和 63 个恶性病变进行了 3T 扩散加权 MRI 成像。使用 Akaike 信息准则对每个病变的扩散模型选择进行了研究。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析进行统计学评估。

结果

拟合优度分析显示,拉伸指数模型在良性和恶性病变中的体素百分比最高(分别为 90.7%和 51.4%)。ADC、D 和 MK 在良性和恶性病变之间(<0.05)以及低级别和高级别透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)之间(<0.05)有显著差异。α在良性组明显低于恶性组(<0.05)。除 D 和 α(分别为 0.143 和 0.112)外,所有扩散指标在 ccRCC 和非 ccRCC 之间均有显著差异(<0.05)。α在区分良恶性病变方面具有最高的诊断准确性,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.923,但这些高级模型的参数在区分肾细胞癌(RCC)亚型和分级方面均未显示出优于 ADC 的性能(>0.05)。

结论

与常规扩散参数相比,α可能为区分良恶性肾肿块提供更多信息,而 ADC 仍然是区分 RCC 亚型和 ccRCC 分级的最有价值参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b5/6470087/b8841ef6a977/kjr-20-791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b5/6470087/e080ca0e2c4d/kjr-20-791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b5/6470087/b8841ef6a977/kjr-20-791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b5/6470087/e080ca0e2c4d/kjr-20-791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b5/6470087/b8841ef6a977/kjr-20-791-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.弥散加权成像单指数、双指数、拉伸指数和峰度模型在肾脏实性肿块鉴别诊断中的比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 May;20(5):791-800. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0474.
2
Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma.单指数、双指数和拉伸指数扩散加权成像模型:用于鉴别肾透明细胞癌和微脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的定量生物标志物。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):240-247. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25524. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
3
Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.多参数扩散加权成像在乳腺病变中的应用:与病理诊断和预后因素的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Sep;46(3):740-750. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25612. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.使用单指数、双指数和拉伸指数扩散加权磁共振成像及扩散峰度磁共振成像对胶质瘤进行分级
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):496-504. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142173. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.基于单指数、双指数和拉伸指数扩散加权成像及扩散峰度成像对弥漫性星形细胞瘤进行分级和增殖评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Dec;109:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging mono-exponential mode with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting pathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.比较单指数模型弥散加权成像与扩散峰度成像预测肾透明细胞癌病理分级的价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109195. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
7
Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.使用拉伸指数扩散模型的全病变直方图分析进行乳腺病变特征描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jun;47(6):1701-1710. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25904. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T.基于扩散加权成像的单指数、双指数和拉伸指数模型:3.0T 下乳腺病变的定量鉴别。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;50(5):1461-1467. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26729. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.双指数和单指数扩散加权成像在评估透明细胞肾细胞癌Fuhrman分级中的比较
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;23(2):100-105. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15519.
10
Characterization of focal liver lesions using the stretched exponential model: comparison with monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.使用拉伸指数模型对肝脏局灶性病变进行特征描述:与单指数和双指数扩散加权磁共振成像的对比。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):5111-5120. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06048-4. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamic changes in quantitative parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging at different b-values in a prostate cancer mouse model and their correlation with histopathology parameters.前列腺癌小鼠模型中不同b值下扩散加权成像定量参数的动态变化及其与组织病理学参数的相关性
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2025 Aug 29;58:e14527. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2025e14527. eCollection 2025.
2
Multiparametric diffusion-weighted MRI for renal microstructural assessment in patients with primary aldosteronism at varying direct renin concentrations.多参数扩散加权磁共振成像用于评估不同直接肾素浓度的原发性醛固酮增多症患者的肾脏微观结构
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05168-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.高级扩散加权成像模型在前列腺癌特征描述中的应用:与定量组织病理学肿瘤组织成分的相关性——一项假说生成研究。
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):918-928. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170904. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
2
Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.扩散加权成像与对比增强磁共振成像在鉴别肾嗜酸细胞瘤和嫌色细胞肾癌中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):4913-4922. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4906-9. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Diffusion kurtosis versus diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: a comparative study.
扩散峰度成像与扩散加权磁共振成像在鉴别透明细胞肾细胞癌和脂肪含量极少的肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤中的比较研究
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Sep 8;31(5):416-422. doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.242880. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
4
Exploring the value of arterial spin labeling and six diffusion MRI models in differentiating solid benign and malignant renal tumors.探讨动脉自旋标记和六种扩散磁共振成像模型在鉴别实性肾良性和恶性肿瘤中的价值。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Dec 5;8(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00537-y.
5
Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging.使用单指数、双指数和拉伸指数扩散加权磁共振成像对透明细胞肾细胞癌进行分级
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 31;14:1456701. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1456701. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluation of renal function in chronic kidney disease using histogram analysis based on multiple diffusion models.基于多扩散模型的直方图分析评估慢性肾脏病患者的肾功能。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Mar 28;97(1156):803-811. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae024.
7
Utility of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched exponential signal models of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) to predict prognosis and survival risk in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LHSCC) patients after chemoradiotherapy.单指数、双指数和拉伸指数信号模型在评估喉和下咽鳞状细胞癌(LHSCC)患者放化疗后预后和生存风险中的应用。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Jul;41(7):712-722. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01399-x. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
8
Monoexponential, biexponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging in kidney assessment: comparison between patients with primary aldosteronism and healthy controls.扩散加权成像的单指数、双指数、拉伸指数和峰度模型在肾脏评估中的应用:原发性醛固酮增多症患者与健康对照者的比较
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Apr;48(4):1340-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03833-0. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
9
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess HPV-Positive versus HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Importance of b-Values.扩散加权成像评估 HPV 阳性与 HPV 阴性口咽鳞状细胞癌:b 值的重要性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):905-912. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7521. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Input layer regularization for magnetic resonance relaxometry biexponential parameter estimation.输入层正则化在磁共振弛豫双指数参数估计中的应用。
Magn Reson Chem. 2022 Nov;60(11):1076-1086. doi: 10.1002/mrc.5289. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.
多参数扩散加权成像在乳腺病变中的应用:与病理诊断和预后因素的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Sep;46(3):740-750. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25612. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.双指数和单指数扩散加权成像在评估透明细胞肾细胞癌Fuhrman分级中的比较
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;23(2):100-105. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15519.
5
Advanced diffusion models in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: Goodness of fit, relationships among diffusion parameters and comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion.头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的高级扩散模型:拟合优度、扩散参数之间的关系以及与动态对比增强灌注的比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;36:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study of Rectal Adenocarcinoma Associated with Histopathologic Prognostic Factors: Preliminary Findings.直肠癌与组织病理学预后因素相关的扩散峰度成像研究:初步发现。
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):66-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160094. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of clear cell renal carcinoma predict low from high nuclear grade tumors.透明细胞肾细胞癌的弥散加权磁共振成像能否预测低核级与高核级肿瘤。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Apr;42(4):1241-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0981-7.
8
Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma.单指数、双指数和拉伸指数扩散加权成像模型:用于鉴别肾透明细胞癌和微脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的定量生物标志物。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):240-247. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25524. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma.扩散加权成像的双指数模型与单指数模型在鉴别常见肾细胞癌和乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤中的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Nov-Dec;17(6):853-863. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.6.853. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Small (<4 cm) Renal Mass: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma Utilizing MR Imaging.小(<4厘米)肾肿块:利用磁共振成像鉴别无可见脂肪的肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾细胞癌
Radiology. 2016 Aug;280(2):653. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016164024.