Tan Susanna K, Milligan Stephen, Sahoo Malaya K, Taylor Nathaniel, Pinsky Benjamin A
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):923-930. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02315-16. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Significant interassay variability in the quantification of BK virus (BKV) DNA precludes establishing broadly applicable thresholds for the management of BKV infection in transplantation. The 1st WHO International Standard for BKV (primary standard) was introduced in 2016 as a common calibrator for improving the harmonization of BKV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and enabling comparisons of biological measurements worldwide. Here, we evaluated the Altona RealStar BKV assay (Altona) and calibrated the results to the international unit (IU) using the Exact Diagnostics BKV verification panel, a secondary standard traceable to the primary standard. The primary and secondary standards on Altona had nearly identical linear regression equations (primary standard, Y = 1.05X - 0.28, = 0.99; secondary standard, Y = 1.04X - 0.26, = 0.99) and conversion factors (primary standard, 1.11 IU/copy; secondary standard, 1.09 IU/copy). A comparison of Altona with a laboratory-developed BKV NAAT assay in IU/ml versus copies/ml using Passing-Bablok regression revealed similar regression lines, no proportional bias, and improvement in the systematic bias (95% confidence interval of intercepts: copies/ml, -0.52 to -1.01; IU/ml, 0.07 to -0.36). Additionally, Bland-Altman analyses revealed a clinically significant reduction of bias when results were reported in IU/ml (IU/ml, -0.10 log; copies/ml, -0.70 log). These results indicate that the use of a common calibrator improved the agreement between the two assays. As clinical laboratories worldwide use calibrators traceable to the primary standard to harmonize BKV NAAT results, we anticipate improved interassay comparisons with a potential for establishing broadly applicable quantitative BKV DNA load cutoffs for clinical practice.
BK病毒(BKV)DNA定量检测中存在显著的批间差异,这使得无法为移植中BKV感染的管理建立广泛适用的阈值。2016年引入了首个世界卫生组织BKV国际标准(初级标准),作为一种通用校准物,以改善BKV核酸扩增检测(NAAT)的一致性,并使全球范围内的生物学测量结果具有可比性。在此,我们评估了Altona RealStar BKV检测方法(Altona),并使用Exact Diagnostics BKV验证板(一种可溯源至初级标准的二级标准)将结果校准为国际单位(IU)。Altona上的初级和二级标准具有几乎相同的线性回归方程(初级标准,Y = 1.05X - 0.28,r = 0.99;二级标准,Y = 1.04X - 0.26,r = 0.99)和转换因子(初级标准,1.11 IU/拷贝;二级标准,1.09 IU/拷贝)。使用Passing-Bablok回归对Altona与实验室自行开发的BKV NAAT检测方法在IU/ml与拷贝/ml方面进行比较,结果显示回归曲线相似,无比例偏差,且系统偏差有所改善(截距的95%置信区间:拷贝/ml,-0.52至-1.01;IU/ml,0.07至-0.36)。此外,Bland-Altman分析显示,当以IU/ml报告结果时,偏差在临床上有显著降低(IU/ml,-0.10 log;拷贝/ml,-0.70 log)。这些结果表明,使用通用校准物可改善两种检测方法之间的一致性。随着全球临床实验室使用可溯源至初级标准的校准物来统一BKV NAAT结果,我们预计批间比较将得到改善,有可能为临床实践建立广泛适用的BKV DNA载量定量临界值。