Frew N M, Cannon T, Nichol T, Smith T J, Stockley I
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1):73-77. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0566.R1.
Vancomycin is commonly added to acrylic bone cement during revision arthroplasty surgery. Proprietary cement preparations containing vancomycin are available, but are significantly more expensive. We investigated whether the elution of antibiotic from 'home-made' cement containing vancomycin was comparable with more expensive commercially available vancomycin impregnated cement.
A total of 18 cement discs containing either proprietary CopalG+V; or 'home-made' CopalR+G with vancomycin added by hand, were made. Each disc contained the same amount of antibiotic (0.5 g gentamycin, 2 g vancomycin) and was immersed in ammonium acetate buffer in a sealed container. Fluid from each container was sampled at eight time points over a two-week period. The concentrations of gentamicin and vancomycin in the fluid were analysed using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
The highest peak concentrations of antibiotic were observed from the 'home-made' cements containing vancomycin, added as in the operating theatre. The overall elution of antibiotic was, fivefold (vancomycin) and twofold (gentamicin) greater from the 'home-made' mix compared with the commercially mixed cement. The use of a vacuum during mixing had no significant effect on antibiotic elution in any of the samples.
These findings suggest that the addition of 2 g vancomycin powder to gentamicin-impregnated bone cement by hand significantly increases the elution of both antibiotics compared with commercially prepared cements containing vancomycin. We found no significant advantages of using expensive commercially produced vancomycin-impregnated cement and recommend the addition of vancomycin powder by hand in the operating theatre. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:73-7.
在关节置换翻修手术中,通常会在丙烯酸骨水泥中添加万古霉素。含有万古霉素的专利骨水泥制剂虽有,但价格要贵得多。我们研究了含万古霉素的“自制”骨水泥中抗生素的洗脱情况是否与更昂贵的市售万古霉素浸渍骨水泥相当。
共制作了18个骨水泥圆盘,其中一些含有专利产品CopalG+V;另一些是“自制”的CopalR+G,并手工添加了万古霉素。每个圆盘含有相同量的抗生素(0.5克庆大霉素、2克万古霉素),并将其浸入密封容器中的醋酸铵缓冲液中。在两周内的八个时间点对每个容器中的液体进行采样。使用高效液相色谱质谱法分析液体中庆大霉素和万古霉素的浓度。
观察到,如在手术室中那样添加万古霉素的“自制”骨水泥中抗生素的峰值浓度最高。与商业混合骨水泥相比,“自制”混合物中抗生素的总体洗脱量,万古霉素高出五倍,庆大霉素高出两倍。混合过程中使用真空对任何样品中的抗生素洗脱均无显著影响。
这些研究结果表明,与市售含万古霉素的骨水泥相比,手工向庆大霉素浸渍骨水泥中添加2克万古霉素粉末可显著增加两种抗生素的洗脱量。我们发现使用昂贵的市售万古霉素浸渍骨水泥没有显著优势,并建议在手术室中手工添加万古霉素粉末。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2017年;99-B:73 - 7。