• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用小麦育种数据中的冠层高光谱反射率预测籽粒产量。

Predicting grain yield using canopy hyperspectral reflectance in wheat breeding data.

作者信息

Montesinos-López Osval A, Montesinos-López Abelardo, Crossa José, de Los Campos Gustavo, Alvarado Gregorio, Suchismita Mondal, Rutkoski Jessica, González-Pérez Lorena, Burgueño Juan

机构信息

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico City, Mexico ; Facultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040 Colima, Colima Mexico.

Departamento de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT), 36240 Guanajuato, Guanajuato Mexico.

出版信息

Plant Methods. 2017 Jan 3;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0154-2. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s13007-016-0154-2
PMID:28053649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5209864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modern agriculture uses hyperspectral cameras to obtain hundreds of reflectance data measured at discrete narrow bands to cover the whole visible light spectrum and part of the infrared and ultraviolet light spectra, depending on the camera. This information is used to construct vegetation indices (VI) (e.g., green normalized difference vegetation index or GNDVI, simple ratio or SRa, etc.) which are used for the prediction of primary traits (e.g., biomass). However, these indices only use some bands and are cultivar-specific; therefore they lose considerable information and are not robust for all cultivars.

RESULTS

This study proposes models that use all available bands as predictors to increase prediction accuracy; we compared these approaches with eight conventional vegetation indexes (VIs) constructed using only some bands. The data set we used comes from CIMMYT's global wheat program and comprises 1170 genotypes evaluated for grain yield (ton/ha) in five environments (Drought, Irrigated, EarlyHeat, Melgas and Reduced Irrigated); the reflectance data were measured in 250 discrete narrow bands ranging between 392 and 851 nm. The proposed models for the simultaneous analysis of all the bands were ordinal least square (OLS), Bayes B, principal components with Bayes B, functional B-spline, functional Fourier and functional partial least square. The results of these models were compared with the OLS performed using as predictors each of the eight VIs individually and combined.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that using all bands simultaneously increased prediction accuracy more than using VI alone. The Splines and Fourier models had the best prediction accuracy for each of the nine time-points under study. Combining image data collected at different time-points led to a small increase in prediction accuracy relative to models that use data from a single time-point. Also, using bands with heritabilities larger than 0.5 only in Drought as predictor variables showed improvements in prediction accuracy.

摘要

背景

现代农业使用高光谱相机获取数百个在离散窄波段测量的反射率数据,以覆盖整个可见光谱以及部分红外和紫外光谱,具体取决于相机。这些信息用于构建植被指数(VI)(例如,绿色归一化差异植被指数或GNDVI、简单比值或SRa等),这些指数用于预测主要性状(例如生物量)。然而,这些指数仅使用了一些波段,并且具有品种特异性;因此,它们丢失了大量信息,并且对所有品种而言并不稳健。

结果

本研究提出了使用所有可用波段作为预测因子的模型,以提高预测准确性;我们将这些方法与仅使用一些波段构建的八个传统植被指数(VIs)进行了比较。我们使用的数据集来自国际玉米小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)的全球小麦项目,包括在五个环境(干旱、灌溉、早热、梅尔加斯和减灌)中评估的1170个基因型的谷物产量(吨/公顷);反射率数据在392至851纳米之间的250个离散窄波段进行测量。用于同时分析所有波段的模型有有序最小二乘法(OLS)、贝叶斯B、带贝叶斯B的主成分、函数B样条、函数傅里叶和函数偏最小二乘法。将这些模型的结果与分别单独使用八个VI中的每一个作为预测因子以及将它们组合使用时进行的OLS结果进行了比较。

结论

我们发现,与单独使用VI相比,同时使用所有波段可提高预测准确性。样条和傅里叶模型在所研究的九个时间点中的每个时间点都具有最佳的预测准确性。相对于使用单个时间点数据的模型,组合在不同时间点收集的图像数据导致预测准确性略有提高。此外,仅在干旱环境中使用遗传力大于0.5的波段作为预测变量显示出预测准确性有所提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/1e9b4a12419e/13007_2016_154_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/6a80624e5127/13007_2016_154_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/92610af07ec2/13007_2016_154_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/f38ef4e20af4/13007_2016_154_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/42852b013a2e/13007_2016_154_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/a318fc526040/13007_2016_154_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/d5b74ee635ad/13007_2016_154_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/0e2e354a3324/13007_2016_154_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/d749d03d44bb/13007_2016_154_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/471d79ec508f/13007_2016_154_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/ca61f82cacdb/13007_2016_154_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/bd9bf273353f/13007_2016_154_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/4f777a51f78b/13007_2016_154_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/1fcd67041954/13007_2016_154_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/b0d4c3caef85/13007_2016_154_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/4dcf14d1d4c8/13007_2016_154_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/1e9b4a12419e/13007_2016_154_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/6a80624e5127/13007_2016_154_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/92610af07ec2/13007_2016_154_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/f38ef4e20af4/13007_2016_154_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/42852b013a2e/13007_2016_154_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/a318fc526040/13007_2016_154_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/d5b74ee635ad/13007_2016_154_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/0e2e354a3324/13007_2016_154_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/d749d03d44bb/13007_2016_154_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/471d79ec508f/13007_2016_154_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/ca61f82cacdb/13007_2016_154_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/bd9bf273353f/13007_2016_154_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/4f777a51f78b/13007_2016_154_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/1fcd67041954/13007_2016_154_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/b0d4c3caef85/13007_2016_154_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/4dcf14d1d4c8/13007_2016_154_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/5209864/1e9b4a12419e/13007_2016_154_Fig16_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting grain yield using canopy hyperspectral reflectance in wheat breeding data.利用小麦育种数据中的冠层高光谱反射率预测籽粒产量。
Plant Methods. 2017 Jan 3;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0154-2. eCollection 2017.
2
Genomic Bayesian functional regression models with interactions for predicting wheat grain yield using hyper-spectral image data.使用高光谱图像数据预测小麦籽粒产量的具有交互作用的基因组贝叶斯功能回归模型。
Plant Methods. 2017 Jul 27;13:62. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0212-4. eCollection 2017.
3
Predicting grain protein content of field-grown winter wheat with satellite images and partial least square algorithm.利用卫星图像和偏最小二乘法算法预测田间冬小麦的籽粒蛋白质含量。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0228500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228500. eCollection 2020.
4
Hyperspectral Reflectance-Derived Relationship Matrices for Genomic Prediction of Grain Yield in Wheat.基于高光谱反射率推导的关系矩阵用于小麦籽粒产量的基因组预测
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Apr 9;9(4):1231-1247. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200856.
5
Combining novel feature selection strategy and hyperspectral vegetation indices to predict crop yield.结合新型特征选择策略和高光谱植被指数预测作物产量。
Plant Methods. 2022 Nov 8;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00949-0.
6
Canopy spectral reflectance indices correlate with yield traits variability in bread wheat genotypes under drought stress.冠层光谱反射率指数与干旱胁迫下小麦基因型产量性状的变异性相关。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 25;10:e14421. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14421. eCollection 2022.
7
High-Throughput Field Phenotyping Traits of Grain Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: Optimizing the Selection of Vegetation Indices and Growth Stages.粮食产量形成和氮素利用效率的高通量田间表型性状:优化植被指数和生育阶段的选择
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 17;10:1672. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01672. eCollection 2019.
8
Improving Wheat Yield Prediction Using Secondary Traits and High-Density Phenotyping Under Heat-Stressed Environments.在热胁迫环境下利用次生性状和高密度表型分析提高小麦产量预测
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Sep 27;12:633651. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.633651. eCollection 2021.
9
Bayesian functional regression as an alternative statistical analysis of high-throughput phenotyping data of modern agriculture.贝叶斯函数回归作为现代农业高通量表型数据的一种替代统计分析方法。
Plant Methods. 2018 Jun 11;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0314-7. eCollection 2018.
10
Root and canopy traits and adaptability genes explain drought tolerance responses in winter wheat.根系和冠层性状及适应性基因解释了冬小麦的耐旱性响应。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0242472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242472. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging unmanned aerial vehicle derived multispectral data for improved genomic prediction in potato (Solanum tuberosum).利用无人机获取的多光谱数据改进马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum)的基因组预测
Plant Genome. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70082. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70082.
2
Multi-trait/environment sparse genomic prediction using the SFSI R-package.使用SFSI R包进行多性状/环境稀疏基因组预测。
Plant Genome. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70050. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70050.
3
High-throughput method for improving rice AGB estimation based on UAV multi-source remote sensing image feature fusion and ensemble learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat.高通量表型分析得出的冠层温度和植被指数提高了小麦籽粒产量系谱选择和基因组选择的准确性。
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Sep 8;6(9):2799-808. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.032888.
2
Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants.基于机器学习的高通量植物胁迫表型分析。
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Feb;21(2):110-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
3
Bayesian regression models outperform partial least squares methods for predicting milk components and technological properties using infrared spectral data.
基于无人机多源遥感影像特征融合与集成学习的水稻地上生物量估算改进高通量方法
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 15;16:1576212. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1576212. eCollection 2025.
4
Enhancing genomic-based forward prediction accuracy in wheat by integrating UAV-derived hyperspectral and environmental data with machine learning under heat-stressed environments.在热胁迫环境下,通过将无人机获取的高光谱和环境数据与机器学习相结合,提高小麦基于基因组的正向预测准确性。
Plant Genome. 2025 Mar;18(1):e20554. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20554.
5
Utilizing VSWIR spectroscopy for macronutrient and micronutrient profiling in winter wheat.利用可见短波红外光谱法对冬小麦中的常量营养素和微量营养素进行分析。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Oct 31;15:1426077. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1426077. eCollection 2024.
6
Phenomic Selection for Hybrid Rapeseed Breeding.杂交油菜育种的表型组选择
Plant Phenomics. 2024 Jul 24;6:0215. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0215. eCollection 2024.
7
Enhancing the potential of phenomic and genomic prediction in winter wheat breeding using high-throughput phenotyping and deep learning.利用高通量表型分析和深度学习提高冬小麦育种中表型组学和基因组预测的潜力。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 30;15:1410249. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1410249. eCollection 2024.
8
Multispectral-derived genotypic similarities from budget cameras allow grain yield prediction and genomic selection augmentation in single and multi-environment scenarios in spring wheat.利用廉价相机获取的多光谱数据得出的基因型相似性,可在春小麦的单环境和多环境场景中实现产量预测及基因组选择增强。
Mol Breed. 2024 Jan 15;44(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11032-024-01449-w. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Predictor bias in genomic and phenomic selection.基因组学和表型选择中的预测偏差。
Theor Appl Genet. 2023 Oct 25;136(11):235. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04479-8.
10
Temporal phenomic predictions from unoccupied aerial systems can outperform genomic predictions.无人航空系统的时间表型预测可以优于基因组预测。
G3 (Bethesda). 2023 Jan 12;13(1). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac294.
在使用红外光谱数据预测牛奶成分和工艺特性方面,贝叶斯回归模型优于偏最小二乘法。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Nov;98(11):8133-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9143. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping.植物表型成像技术综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Oct 24;14(11):20078-111. doi: 10.3390/s141120078.
5
Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package.使用BGLR统计软件包进行全基因组回归与预测。
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):483-95. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.164442. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier.大田高通量表型分析:作物新的育种前沿。
Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 16.