Ohnuma Tetsu, Uchino Shigehiko
Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169341. eCollection 2017.
To systematically review AKI outcome prediction models and their external validation studies, to describe the discrepancy of reported accuracy between the results of internal and external validations, and to identify variables frequently included in the prediction models.
We searched the MEDLINE and Web of Science electronic databases (until January 2016). Studies were eligible if they derived a model to predict mortality of AKI patients or externally validated at least one of the prediction models, and presented area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUROC) to assess model discrimination. Studies were excluded if they described only results of logistic regression without reporting a scoring system, or if a prediction model was generated from a specific cohort.
A total of 2204 potentially relevant articles were found and screened, of which 12 articles reporting original prediction models for hospital mortality in AKI patients and nine articles assessing external validation were selected. Among the 21 studies for AKI prediction models and their external validation, 12 were single-center (57%), and only three included more than 1,000 patients (14%). The definition of AKI was not uniform and none used recently published consensus criteria for AKI. Although good performance was reported in their internal validation, most of the prediction models had poor discrimination with an AUROC below 0.7 in the external validation studies. There were 10 common non-renal variables that were reported in more than three prediction models: mechanical ventilation, age, gender, hypotension, liver failure, oliguria, sepsis/septic shock, low albumin, consciousness and low platelet count.
Information in this systematic review should be useful for future prediction model derivation by providing potential candidate predictors, and for future external validation by listing up the published prediction models.
系统评价急性肾损伤(AKI)预后预测模型及其外部验证研究,描述内部验证和外部验证结果报告的准确性差异,并确定预测模型中经常纳入的变量。
检索MEDLINE和科学网电子数据库(截至2016年1月)。若研究得出预测AKI患者死亡率的模型或对至少一个预测模型进行外部验证,并呈现受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以评估模型辨别力,则该研究符合纳入标准。若研究仅描述逻辑回归结果而未报告评分系统,或从特定队列生成预测模型,则将其排除。
共检索并筛选出2204篇潜在相关文章,其中12篇报告了AKI患者医院死亡率的原始预测模型,9篇评估外部验证的文章被选中。在21项关于AKI预测模型及其外部验证的研究中,12项为单中心研究(57%),仅有3项纳入超过1000例患者(14%)。AKI的定义不统一,且均未采用最近发表的AKI共识标准。尽管在内部验证中报告了良好的性能,但在外部验证研究中,大多数预测模型辨别力较差,AUROC低于0.7。有10个常见的非肾脏变量在超过3个预测模型中被报告:机械通气、年龄、性别、低血压、肝功能衰竭、少尿、脓毒症/脓毒性休克、低白蛋白、意识和低血小板计数。
本系统评价中的信息通过提供潜在的候选预测因素,对未来预测模型的推导应是有用的,并通过列出已发表的预测模型,对未来的外部验证也应是有用的。