Suresh Manasa, Korolowicz Kyle E, Balarezo Maria, Iyer Radhakrishnan P, Padmanabhan Seetharamaiyer, Cleary Dillon, Gimi Rayomand, Sheri Anjaneyulu, Yon Changsuek, Kallakury Bhaskar V, Tucker Robin D, Afdhal Nezam, Menne Stephan
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Milford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169631. eCollection 2017.
SB 9200, an orally bioavailable dinucleotide, activates the viral sensor proteins, retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-I) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) causing the induction of the interferon (IFN) signaling cascade for antiviral defense. The present study evaluated the overall antiviral response in woodchucks upon induction of immune response, first with SB 9200 followed by Entecavir (ETV) versus reduction of viral burden with ETV followed by SB 9200 immunomodulation. Woodchucks chronically infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) were treated orally with SB 9200 (30 mg/kg/day) and ETV (0.5 mg/kg/day). Group 1 received ETV for 4 weeks followed by SB 9200 for 12 weeks. Group 2 received SB 9200 for 12 weeks followed by ETV for 4 weeks. At the end of treatment in Group 2, average reductions of 6.4 log10 in serum WHV DNA and 3.3 log10 in WHV surface antigen were observed whereas in Group 1, average reductions of 4.2 log10 and 1.1 log10 in viremia and antigenemia were noted. Both groups demonstrated marked reductions in hepatic WHV nucleic acid levels which were more pronounced in Group 2. Following treatment cessation and the 8-week follow-up, recrudescence of viral replication was observed in Group 1 while viral relapse in Group 2 was significantly delayed. The antiviral effects observed in both groups were associated with temporally different induction of IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-stimulated genes in blood and liver. These results suggest that the induction of host immune responses by pretreatment with SB 9200 followed by ETV resulted in antiviral efficacy that was superior to that obtained using the strategy of viral reduction with ETV followed by immunomodulation.
SB 9200是一种口服生物可利用的二核苷酸,可激活病毒传感器蛋白视黄酸诱导基因1(RIG-I)和含核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域蛋白2(NOD2),引发干扰素(IFN)信号级联反应以进行抗病毒防御。本研究评估了土拨鼠在诱导免疫反应后的整体抗病毒反应,先是使用SB 9200,然后使用恩替卡韦(ETV),与先使用ETV降低病毒载量,然后进行SB 9200免疫调节的情况进行对比。用SB 9200(30毫克/千克/天)和ETV(0.5毫克/千克/天)对慢性感染土拨鼠肝炎病毒(WHV)的土拨鼠进行口服治疗。第1组接受ETV治疗4周,随后接受SB 9200治疗12周。第2组接受SB 9200治疗12周,随后接受ETV治疗4周。在第2组治疗结束时,观察到血清WHV DNA平均降低6.4个对数10,WHV表面抗原平均降低3.3个对数10,而在第1组中,观察到病毒血症和抗原血症平均降低4.2个对数10和1.1个对数10。两组肝脏中WHV核酸水平均显著降低,在第2组中更为明显。在停止治疗并进行8周随访后,第1组观察到病毒复制复发,而第2组病毒复发明显延迟。两组观察到的抗病毒效果与血液和肝脏中IFN-α、IFN-β和IFN刺激基因在时间上的不同诱导有关。这些结果表明,先用SB 9200预处理,然后使用ETV诱导宿主免疫反应,所产生的抗病毒效果优于先使用ETV降低病毒载量,然后进行免疫调节的策略所获得的效果。