Conrad Rupert, Mücke Martin, Marinova Milka, Burghardt Anna, Stieber Christiane, Cuhls Henning, Radbruch Lukas
1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany .
2 Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany .
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;20(6):604-610. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0218. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Assessment of quality of life is of central importance in palliative care to understand patients' needs and improve their treatment. However, due to the severely compromised state of health of the severely ill or dying patients, the possibility of an adequate assessment with longer questionnaires is limited.
Investigation of the criterion-oriented validity of a single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients.
In a cross-sectional study, correlations of the single item with established questionnaires were analyzed.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: At Malteser Hospital Bonn and Bonn University Hospital, 72 palliative patients, mainly suffering from cancer, were investigated.
Clinical symptoms were measured by the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) and quality of life was assessed by the single item "How satisfied are you currently with your physical and emotional well-being?" on a 7-point scale as well as by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS).
Seventy-one of 72 patients filled in the single item and the POS, 64 patients the FACT-G. There was a high correlation between the assessment of quality of life by the single item and the FACT-G (r = 0.695, p < 0.01) as well as the POS (r = -0.630, p < 0.01).
The study confirms the criterion-oriented validity of the single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients. This can be seen as a first step to validate this economic instrument. Future studies should focus on the analysis of further psychometric aspects (e.g., reliability, sensitivity to change) of the single item.
生活质量评估在姑息治疗中对于了解患者需求和改善其治疗至关重要。然而,由于重症或临终患者的健康状况严重受损,使用较长问卷进行充分评估的可能性有限。
调查用于测量姑息治疗患者生活质量的单个条目的标准效度。
在一项横断面研究中,分析了该单个条目与既定问卷的相关性。
参与者/设置:在波恩马尔特泽医院和波恩大学医院,对72名主要患有癌症的姑息治疗患者进行了调查。
通过最小文档系统(MIDOS)测量临床症状,生活质量通过单个条目“您目前对自己的身心健康有多满意?”进行7分制评估,同时通过癌症治疗功能评估通用版(FACT-G)和姑息治疗结果量表(POS)进行评估。
72名患者中有71名填写了单个条目和POS,64名患者填写了FACT-G。单个条目对生活质量的评估与FACT-G(r = 0.695,p < 0.01)以及POS(r = -0.630,p < 0.01)之间存在高度相关性。
该研究证实了用于测量姑息治疗患者生活质量的单个条目的标准效度。这可被视为验证这种经济工具的第一步。未来的研究应侧重于分析该单个条目的进一步心理测量方面(例如,信度、对变化的敏感性)。