• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症康复中与健康相关生活质量领域的重要性及满意度

Importance of and Satisfaction with Domains of Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Rehabilitation.

作者信息

Hinz Andreas, Schulte Thomas, Ernst Jochen, Mehnert-Theuerkauf Anja

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Rehabilitation Clinic Bad Oexen, 32549 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;14(8):1991. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081991.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14081991
PMID:35454898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9031483/
Abstract

Instruments for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) generally do not consider the subjective importance of the dimensions they comprise. The aims of this study were to analyze the subjectively perceived importance of the dimension of HRQoL and to investigate their relationship to the satisfaction ratings with these dimensions. A total of 1108 participants enrolled in a cancer rehabilitation program were surveyed. Patients rated eight dimensions of HRQoL (physical functioning, autonomy, emotional stability, cognitive functioning, social relationships, vitality, absence of pain, and sleep quality), as well as global health in terms of how important those dimensions are to them, and how satisfied they are with them. The dimensions with the highest importance ratings were autonomy and social relationships. There were only small sex differences in the importance ratings, but younger patients rated health as being more important than older patients did. The correlations between the importance ratings and the satisfaction ratings of the specific HRQoL dimensions ranged from -0.06 to 0.40, and the correlation between importance and satisfaction for global health was 0.01. Importance ratings provide relevant information for health care professionals in addition to the HRQoL assessments in the context of cancer rehabilitation.

摘要

用于测量健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的工具通常并不考虑其所包含维度的主观重要性。本研究的目的是分析HRQoL维度的主观感知重要性,并调查其与这些维度满意度评分之间的关系。对1108名参加癌症康复项目的参与者进行了调查。患者对HRQoL的八个维度(身体功能、自主性、情绪稳定性、认知功能、社会关系、活力、无疼痛和睡眠质量)以及整体健康进行了评分,内容包括这些维度对他们的重要程度以及他们对这些维度的满意程度。重要性评分最高的维度是自主性和社会关系。在重要性评分方面,性别差异很小,但年轻患者比老年患者更看重健康。特定HRQoL维度的重要性评分与满意度评分之间的相关性在-0.06至0.40之间,整体健康的重要性与满意度之间的相关性为0.01。除了癌症康复背景下的HRQoL评估外,重要性评分还为医疗保健专业人员提供了相关信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e1/9031483/1caf74a49f46/cancers-14-01991-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e1/9031483/1caf74a49f46/cancers-14-01991-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e1/9031483/1caf74a49f46/cancers-14-01991-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Importance of and Satisfaction with Domains of Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Rehabilitation.癌症康复中与健康相关生活质量领域的重要性及满意度
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;14(8):1991. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081991.
2
Supportive care needs and health-related quality of life in cancer patients receiving palliative care.接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的支持性护理需求及与健康相关的生活质量
Front Psychol. 2023 May 26;14:1166801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166801. eCollection 2023.
3
Quality of Life Domains in Breast Cancer Survivors: The Relationship Between Importance and Satisfaction Ratings.乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量领域:重要性与满意度评分之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 22;13:923537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923537. eCollection 2022.
4
The Relationship between Supportive Care Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Patients.癌症患者支持性护理需求与健康相关生活质量的关系。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;11(15):2161. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152161.
5
Quality of life in urologic cancer patients: importance of and satisfaction with specific quality of life domains.泌尿科癌症患者的生活质量:特定生活质量领域的重要性和满意度。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02954-7. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
6
Are importance-satisfaction discrepancies with regard to ratings of specific health-related quality-of-life aspects valid indicators of disease- and treatment-related distress among patients with endocrine gastrointestinal tumours?对于特定的与健康相关的生活质量方面的评分,重要性-满意度差异是否是内分泌胃肠道肿瘤患者疾病和治疗相关痛苦的有效指标?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007 Nov;16(6):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00781.x.
7
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
8
Associations between scores of psychosomatic health symptoms and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的身心症状评分与健康相关生活质量之间的关联。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 23;11:176. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-176.
9
Lower limb atherosclerotic disease causes various deteriorations of patients' health-related quality of life.下肢动脉粥样硬化疾病会导致患者与健康相关的生活质量出现各种恶化。
J Vasc Nurs. 2006 Dec;24(4):102-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2006.06.015.
10
Perception of quality of care: comparison of the views of patients' with lung cancer and their family members.患者及其家属对护理质量的感知:比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Feb;21(3-4):585-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03923.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of quality of life in cancer patients using anchoring vignettes: comparisons between mixed cancer patients, patients receiving palliative care, and the general population.使用锚定 vignettes 评估癌症患者的生活质量:混合癌症患者、接受姑息治疗的患者与普通人群之间的比较。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1439655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1439655. eCollection 2025.
2
Sexuality, fertility, family planning, family life, and partnership in young breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study.年轻乳腺癌患者的性取向、生育能力、计划生育、家庭生活及伴侣关系:一项纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1127359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127359. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.癌症康复中的临床结局评估以及患者报告结局的核心作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010084.
2
Quality of life in urologic cancer patients: importance of and satisfaction with specific quality of life domains.泌尿科癌症患者的生活质量:特定生活质量领域的重要性和满意度。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02954-7. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
3
Early, integrated palliative rehabilitation improves quality of life of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer: The Pal-Rehab randomized controlled trial.
早期综合姑息康复可改善新诊断晚期癌症患者的生活质量:Pal-Rehab 随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;35(7):1344-1355. doi: 10.1177/02692163211015574. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Past and Current Practice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.过去和现在在癌症随机临床试验中使用患者报告结局测量的情况:系统评价。
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):585-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Sleep problems in cancer patients: a comparison between the Jenkins Sleep Scale and the single-item sleep scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30.癌症患者的睡眠问题:詹金斯睡眠量表与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)单项睡眠量表的比较
Sleep Med. 2020 Jul;71:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
The importance of and satisfaction with sex life among breast cancer survivors in comparison with healthy female controls and women with mental depression or arterial hypertension: results from the Finnish nationwide HeSSup cohort study.乳腺癌幸存者与健康女性对照者以及患有精神抑郁症或动脉高血压女性相比,其性生活的重要性和满意度:来自芬兰全国性 HeSSup 队列研究的结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3847-3854. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05228-8. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
7
Age and gender differences in anxiety and depression in cancer patients compared with the general population.癌症患者与普通人群相比,在焦虑和抑郁方面存在年龄和性别差异。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13129. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13129. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Comparison of perceptions of unmet supportive care needs between cancer patients and their oncologists.癌症患者及其肿瘤医生对未满足的支持性护理需求的认知比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4229-4235. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04705-4. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Importance ratings on patient-reported outcome items for survivorship care: comparison between pediatric cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians.患者报告的生存护理结局项目的重要性评分:儿童癌症幸存者、父母和临床医生之间的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1877-1884. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1854-z. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Individual Importance Weighting of Domain Satisfaction Ratings does Not Increase Validity.领域满意度评分的个体重要性加权并不会提高有效性。
Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.116. Epub 2018 Feb 26.