Simonian P T, Routt M L, Harrington R M, Tencer A F
Harborview Medical Center, Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle.
J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Dec;8(6):476-82.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate pubic ramus fracture fixation. This biomechanical evaluation compared standard plating techniques with retrograde medullary screw fixation of a superior pubic ramus fracture in a pelvic fracture model. Six fresh-frozen, cadaveric pelvic specimens with a mean age of 79 years were harvested. These specimens were physiologically loaded according to the following modifications and instrumentations: (a) intact; (b) an APC-II unstable pelvic injury, specifically, unilateral superior and inferior rami osteotomies combined with ipsilateral anterior sacroiliac (SI) joint, sacrospinous, and sacrotuberous ligamentous disruptions, without fixation; (c) disrupted as in (b) but fixed anteriorly with a 10-hole 3.5-mm reconstruction plate contoured to the superior ramus and secured with four 3.5-mm cortical screws; (d) disrupted as in (b) but fixed anteriorly with a 10-hole 3.5-mm reconstruction plate contoured to the superior ramus and secured with six 3.5-mm cortical screws; (e) disrupted as in (b) but fixed anteriorly with a 4.5-mm retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus cortical screw 80 mm long (medial to the hip joint); and (f) disrupted as in (b) but fixed anteriorly with a 4.5-mm retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus cortical screw 130 mm long that was extraarticular and engaged the lateral iliac cortex cephalad to the ipsilateral hip joint. The posterior disruptions of the pelvic ring were not fixed. The APC-II injury created in this study resulted in significant (p < 0.05) motion at the disrupted rami and the injured SI joint, compared with the intact pelvic specimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是评估耻骨支骨折的固定。在骨盆骨折模型中,这项生物力学评估将标准钢板固定技术与耻骨上支骨折的逆行髓内螺钉固定进行了比较。收集了6个平均年龄为79岁的新鲜冷冻尸体骨盆标本。这些标本根据以下改良和器械操作进行生理加载:(a)完整;(b)APC-II型不稳定骨盆损伤,具体为单侧耻骨上下支截骨术,合并同侧骶髂关节前侧、骶棘韧带和骶结节韧带断裂,未固定;(c)如(b)中所述的损伤,但用一块10孔3.5毫米的重建钢板进行前路固定,该钢板根据耻骨上支轮廓塑形,并用4枚3.5毫米皮质骨螺钉固定;(d)如(b)中所述的损伤,但用一块10孔3.5毫米的重建钢板进行前路固定,该钢板根据耻骨上支轮廓塑形,并用6枚3.5毫米皮质骨螺钉固定;(e)如(b)中所述的损伤,但用一枚80毫米长的4.5毫米逆行髓内耻骨上支皮质骨螺钉进行前路固定(位于髋关节内侧);(f)如(b)中所述的损伤,但用一枚130毫米长的4.5毫米逆行髓内耻骨上支皮质骨螺钉进行前路固定,该螺钉位于关节外,在同侧髋关节上方与髂骨外侧皮质相接合。骨盆环的后侧损伤未进行固定。与完整的骨盆标本相比,本研究中造成的APC-II损伤导致骨折支和受伤的骶髂关节出现显著(p<0.05)活动。(摘要截选至250字)