Alonso Alvaro, MacLehose Richard F, Chen Lin Y, Bengtson Lindsay Gs, Chamberlain Alanna M, Norby Faye L, Lutsey Pamela L
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Heart. 2017 Jun;103(11):834-839. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310586. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
To assess the risk of liver injury hospitalisation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and to determine predictors of liver injury hospitalisation in this population.
We studied 113 717 patients (mean age 70, 39% women) with AF included in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases with a first prescription for oral anticoagulation after 4 November 2011, followed through 31 December 2014. Of these, 56 879 initiated warfarin, 17 286 initiated dabigatran, 30 347 initiated rivaroxaban and 9205 initiated apixaban. Liver injury hospitalisation and comorbidities were identified from healthcare claims.
During a median follow-up of 12 months, 960 hospitalisations with liver injury were identified. Rates of liver injury hospitalisation (per 1000 person-years) by oral anticoagulant were 9.0 (warfarin), 4.0 (dabigatran), 6.6 (rivaroxaban) and 5.6 (apixaban). After multivariable adjustment, liver injury hospitalisation rates were lower in initiators of DOACs compared with warfarin: HR (95% CI) of 0.57 (0.46 to 0.71), 0.88 (0.75 to 1.03) and 0.70 (0.50 to 0.97) for initiators of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively (vs. warfarin). Compared with dabigatran initiators, rivaroxaban initiators had a 56% increased risk of liver injury hospitalisation (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.99). In addition to type of anticoagulant, prior liver, gallbladder and kidney disease, cancer, anaemia, heart failure and alcoholism significantly predicted liver injury hospitalisation. A predictive model including these variables had adequate discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.67, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.70).
Among patients with non-valvular AF, DOACs were associated with lower risk of liver injury hospitalisation compared with warfarin, with dabigatran showing the lowest risk.
评估房颤(AF)患者开始使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)或华法林后住院治疗肝损伤的风险,并确定该人群肝损伤住院治疗的预测因素。
我们研究了纳入MarketScan商业和医疗保险补充数据库中的113717例房颤患者(平均年龄70岁,39%为女性),这些患者在2011年11月4日后首次开具口服抗凝剂处方,并随访至2014年12月31日。其中,56879例开始使用华法林,17286例开始使用达比加群,30347例开始使用利伐沙班,9205例开始使用阿哌沙班。通过医疗保健理赔记录确定肝损伤住院治疗情况和合并症。
在中位随访12个月期间,共确定960例肝损伤住院病例。口服抗凝剂导致的肝损伤住院率(每1000人年)分别为:华法林9.0、达比加群4.0、利伐沙班6.6、阿哌沙班5.6。多变量调整后,与华法林相比,DOACs起始使用者的肝损伤住院率较低:达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班起始使用者的HR(95%CI)分别为0.57(0.46至0.71)、0.88(0.75至1.03)和0.70(0.50至0.97)(与华法林相比)。与达比加群起始使用者相比,利伐沙班起始使用者肝损伤住院风险增加56%(HR 1.56,95%CI 1.22至1.99)。除抗凝剂类型外,既往肝脏、胆囊和肾脏疾病、癌症、贫血、心力衰竭和酗酒是肝损伤住院治疗的显著预测因素。包含这些变量的预测模型具有足够的判别能力(C统计量0.67,95%CI 0.64至0.70)。
在非瓣膜性房颤患者中,与华法林相比,DOACs与肝损伤住院风险较低相关,其中达比加群风险最低。