Prost Katharina, Birk Jago Jonathan, Lehndorff Eva, Gerlach Renate, Amelung Wulf
Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) - Soil Science and Soil Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Institute for Geography - Soil Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0164882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164882. eCollection 2017.
Steroids are used as faecal markers in environmental and in archaeological studies, because they provide insights into ancient agricultural practices and the former presence of animals. Up to now, steroid analyses could only identify and distinguish between herbivore, pig, and human faecal matter and their residues in soils and sediments. We hypothesized that a finer differentiation between faeces of different livestock animals could be achieved when the analyses of several steroids is combined (Δ5-sterols, 5α-stanols, 5β-stanols, epi-5β-stanols, stanones, and bile acids). We therefore reviewed the existing literature on various faecal steroids from livestock and humans and analysed faeces from old livestock breed (cattle, horse, donkey, sheep, goat, goose, and pig) and humans. Additionally, we performed steroid analyses on soil material of four different archaeological periods (sites located in the Lower Rhine Basin, Western Germany, dating to the Linearbandkeramik, Urnfield Period / Bronze Age, Iron Age, Roman Age) with known or supposed faecal inputs. By means of already established and newly applied steroid ratios of the analysed faeces together with results from the literature, all considered livestock faeces, except sheep and cattle, could be distinguished on the basis of their steroid signatures. Most remarkably was the identification of horse faeces (via the ratio: epi-5β-stigmastanol: 5β-stigmastanol + epicoprostanol: coprostanol; together with the presence of chenodeoxycholic acid) and a successful differentiation between goat (with chenodeoxycholic acid) and sheep/cattle faeces (without chenodeoxycholic acid). The steroid analysis of archaeological soil material confirmed the supposed faecal inputs, even if these inputs had occurred several thousand years ago.
类固醇在环境和考古研究中被用作粪便标志物,因为它们能让人们深入了解古代农业实践以及过去动物的存在情况。到目前为止,类固醇分析只能识别和区分草食动物、猪和人类的粪便及其在土壤和沉积物中的残留物。我们推测,当结合多种类固醇(Δ5-甾醇、5α-甾烷醇、5β-甾烷醇、表-5β-甾烷醇、甾烷酮和胆汁酸)进行分析时,可以更精细地区分不同家畜的粪便。因此,我们回顾了关于家畜和人类各种粪便类固醇的现有文献,并分析了古老家畜品种(牛、马、驴、羊、山羊、鹅和猪)以及人类的粪便。此外,我们对四个不同考古时期(位于德国西部莱茵河下游流域的遗址,可追溯到线纹陶文化、瓮棺文化时期/青铜时代、铁器时代、罗马时代)已知或推测有粪便输入的土壤材料进行了类固醇分析。通过已建立的和新应用的所分析粪便的类固醇比率以及文献结果,除了绵羊和牛之外,所有考虑的家畜粪便都可以根据其类固醇特征进行区分。最显著的是识别出马的粪便(通过比率:表-5β-豆甾烷醇:5β-豆甾烷醇 + 表粪甾烷醇:粪甾烷醇;以及鹅去氧胆酸的存在),并成功区分山羊(有鹅去氧胆酸)和绵羊/牛的粪便(没有鹅去氧胆酸)。对考古土壤材料的类固醇分析证实了推测的粪便输入,即使这些输入发生在几千年前。