• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切开复位内固定术与切除术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的疗效比较

A comparison of the open reduction-internal fixation and resection arthroplasty techniques in treatment of Mason Type 3 radial head fractures.

作者信息

Akman Yunus Emre, Sukur Erhan, Circi Esra, Ozyalvac Osman Nuri, Ozyer Fatih, Ozturkmen Yusuf

机构信息

Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Mar;51(2):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.010. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.010
PMID:28065478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6197420/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare a series of patients surgically treated with ORIF or early resection arthroplasty due to isolated comminuted radial head fractures.

METHODS

Between the years 2009 and 2013, 34 patients with isolated comminuted fractures of the radial head (Mason Type 3) had been operated (ORIF in 19 patients, resection arthroplasty in 15 patients). The mean age of the patients in the ORIF group was 38.5 years and 54 years in the resection group. The carrying angle (CA) and ulnar variance were measured bilaterally, and radiographs were reviewed for degenerative elbow arthritis. The Mayo elbow performance score, Turkish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH-T) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical results.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period in the ORIF group was 40.2 months and 44.4 months in the resection group. In the ORIF group, 11 patients were clinically rated excellent, six good, and two fair. In the resection group, seven patients had excellent, five had good, and two had fair scores. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the ORIF and resection groups regarding the clinical and radiological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

With these short-term results, resection arthroplasty may be considered an effective method in the treatment of isolated comminuted radial head fractures, as it is less technically demanding and it also allows for early postoperative motion. However, the patients should be evaluated in detail, regarding ligamentous injuries prior to resection arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性比较一系列因单纯粉碎性桡骨头骨折接受切开复位内固定术(ORIF)或早期切除关节成形术治疗的患者。

方法

2009年至2013年间,34例单纯桡骨头粉碎性骨折(Mason 3型)患者接受了手术治疗(19例接受切开复位内固定术,15例接受切除关节成形术)。切开复位内固定术组患者的平均年龄为38.5岁,切除组为54岁。双侧测量携带角(CA)和尺骨变异,并复查X线片以评估肘关节退行性关节炎。采用梅奥肘关节功能评分、土耳其版上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH-T)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估临床结果。

结果

切开复位内固定术组的平均随访时间为40.2个月,切除组为44.4个月。切开复位内固定术组中,11例患者临床评定为优,6例为良,2例为中。切除组中,7例患者为优,5例为良,2例为中。在临床和影像学结果方面,我们未发现切开复位内固定术组与切除组之间存在统计学显著差异。

结论

基于这些短期结果,切除关节成形术可被视为治疗单纯粉碎性桡骨头骨折的有效方法,因为其技术要求较低,且术后可早期活动。然而,在进行切除关节成形术前,应详细评估患者的韧带损伤情况。

证据水平

III级,治疗性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/6197420/ff2bf83ac320/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/6197420/f622a0febe5b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/6197420/ff2bf83ac320/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/6197420/f622a0febe5b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7e/6197420/ff2bf83ac320/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of the open reduction-internal fixation and resection arthroplasty techniques in treatment of Mason Type 3 radial head fractures.切开复位内固定术与切除术治疗Mason Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折的疗效比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Mar;51(2):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.010. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
Using an anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plate system leads to reliable results in comminuted radial head fractures.使用解剖预塑形的低剖面锁定钢板系统治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折可取得可靠的效果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):789-795. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2693-z. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
Open reduction and internal fixation for Mason type III radial head fractures: Is it different from that for Mason type II fractures?梅森III型桡骨头骨折的切开复位内固定:与梅森II型骨折的切开复位内固定有何不同?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018802506. doi: 10.1177/2309499018802506.
4
Open reduction and internal fixation versus radial head arthroplasty in the treatment of adult closed comminuted radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV).切开复位内固定术与桡骨头置换术治疗成人闭合性粉碎性桡骨头骨折(改良Mason III型和IV型)的比较
Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1659-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2755-1. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
Open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafts for comminuted mason type II radial head fractures.采用植骨进行切开复位内固定治疗粉碎性Mason II型桡骨头骨折。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 16;19(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2214-4.
7
Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.桡骨头骨折(改良Mason III型和IV型)患者行桡骨头置换术与切开复位内固定术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Apr;26(3):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1739-1. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Preserving the radial head in comminuted Mason type III fractures without fixation to the radial shaft: a mid-term clinical and radiographic follow-up study.不固定于桡骨干粉碎性 Mason Ⅲ型骨折中的桡骨头:中期临床和放射学随访研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2215-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.036.
9
Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review.桡骨头切除术与关节成形术治疗不可修复粉碎性骨折 Mason Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型:系统评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:4020625. doi: 10.1155/2018/4020625. eCollection 2018.
10
Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Comparison of resection and internal fixation.桡骨头粉碎性骨折。切除术与内固定术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):76-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01323.

引用本文的文献

1
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Resection of the Radial Head to Treat Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow: What if Radial Head Replacement is not Possible?切开复位内固定与桡骨头切除术治疗肘关节恐怖三联征:若无法进行桡骨头置换该怎么办?
Adv Biomed Res. 2025 Jul 21;14:67. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_136_22. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcomes after internal fixation, arthroplasty and resection for treatment of comminuted radial head fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.内固定、关节置换和切除治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的临床疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr;105(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00679-3. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mason type II and III radial head fracture in patients older than 65: is there still a place for radial head resection?65岁以上患者的梅森II型和III型桡骨头骨折:桡骨头切除术还有存在的意义吗?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S77-83. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0425-1. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
2
Resection arthroplasty for Mason type III radial head fractures yield good clinical but poor radiological results in the long term.
Orthopedics. 2013 Nov;36(11):e1358-64. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131021-15.
3
Surgical management of Mason type III radial head fractures.梅森III型桡骨头骨折的手术治疗
Functional outcomes evaluation after radial head arthoplasty in DR. Syaiful Anwar General Hospital: Case series.
斯亚富尔·安瓦尔将军医院桡骨头成形术后的功能结果评估:病例系列
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;72:632-635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Use of surgical glue for Mason type III radial head fractures: A case report.手术胶水用于梅森III型桡骨头骨折:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15863. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015863.
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jul;47(4):323-32. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.114907.
4
Early radial head excision for displaced and comminuted radial head fractures: considerations and concerns at long-term follow-up.早期桡骨头切除术治疗移位性和粉碎性桡骨头骨折:长期随访的考虑和关注点。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Apr;26(4):236-40. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318220af4f.
5
Resection arthroplasty for radial head fractures: Long-term follow-up.桡骨头骨折切除关节成形术:长期随访。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.005.
6
Long-term results of radial head resection following isolated radial head fractures in patients younger than forty years old.四十岁以下患者孤立性桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):558-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00332.
7
The stiff elbow.僵硬的肘部。
Hand (N Y). 2009 Dec;4(4):368-79. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9181-z. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
8
Documentation of associated injuries occurring with radial head fracture.桡骨头骨折伴发损伤的记录。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jan;466(1):130-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0064-8. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
9
Open reduction and internal fixation compared with excision for unstable displaced fractures of the radial head.桡骨头不稳定移位骨折切开复位内固定与切除术的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 May-Jun;32(5):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.016.
10
Comminuted radial head fractures treated with a modular metallic radial head arthroplasty. Study of outcomes.采用模块化金属桡骨头置换术治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折。疗效研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2192-200. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00962.