Zhang Lei, Dou Xiaowen, Kong Weijun, Liu Congmin, Han Xu, Yang Meihua
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China.
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Education, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China.
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Feb 3;1483:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.079. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Although extraction methods based on immunoaffinity column (IAC) cleanup have been used to detect aflatoxins in medicinal herbs, they do not yield satisfactory results for all sample matrices. The difficulty arises from the chemical complexity of the herbs, and there is a pressing need to determine which steps in IAC cleanup limit the scope of aflatoxin detection in many different kinds of medicinal herbs. In this work, we found that there were two main factors that severely decreased antibody-antigen recognition and led to serious nonspecific adsorption: (1) high extract acidity and (2) high co-extraction of interfering compounds. We therefore carried out a systematic study to optimize extraction efficiency. We found that dilution of samples in 0.1M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.8, 2% Tween-20) at a 1:8 dilution ratio mitigated the effect of high acidity, decreased co-precipitation of compounds and nonspecific adsorption, and ameliorated the matrix effect. To validate this finding, and test if our method is widely applicable to in different kinds of herbal materials, we analyzed several representative complex sample matrices including fructus, cortex, and radix with varying extract pH values. The recovery efficiency was generally higher than 70%. We further validated our method by testing a certified reference material, and found that our approach accurately quantified aflatoxin concentration. After validation, we successfully used this method to determine the aflatoxin concentration of real samples. The approach described here could potentially be used to extract aflatoxin from other complex matrices with varying acidity.
尽管基于免疫亲和柱(IAC)净化的提取方法已用于检测草药中的黄曲霉毒素,但对于所有样品基质而言,这些方法并未产生令人满意的结果。困难源于草药的化学复杂性,迫切需要确定IAC净化过程中的哪些步骤限制了多种不同草药中黄曲霉毒素的检测范围。在这项工作中,我们发现有两个主要因素严重降低了抗体-抗原识别并导致严重的非特异性吸附:(1)提取物酸度高和(2)干扰化合物的共提取物含量高。因此,我们进行了系统研究以优化提取效率。我们发现,以1:8的稀释比例在0.1M磷酸盐缓冲溶液(pH 7.8,2%吐温20)中稀释样品可减轻高酸度的影响,减少化合物的共沉淀和非特异性吸附,并改善基质效应。为了验证这一发现,并测试我们的方法是否广泛适用于不同种类的草药材料,我们分析了几种具有代表性的复杂样品基质,包括果实、皮层和根,其提取物的pH值各不相同。回收率一般高于70%。我们通过测试一种有证标准物质进一步验证了我们的方法,发现我们的方法能够准确地定量黄曲霉毒素浓度。经过验证后,我们成功地使用该方法测定了实际样品中的黄曲霉毒素浓度。这里描述的方法有可能用于从其他酸度不同的复杂基质中提取黄曲霉毒素。