Pianta T J, Succar L, Davidson T, Buckley N A, Endre Z H
Prince Of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia; Northern Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Epping, Victoria, Australia.
Prince Of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Toxicol Lett. 2017 Feb 15;268:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Damage biomarkers may identify mechanisms and sites of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the utility of novel AKI biomarkers differs by context, and their utility for monitoring treatment of AKI is unknown. We hypothesized that selected AKI biomarkers would facilitate monitoring of mechanism-specific treatment. We examined this using a panel of biomarkers to monitor cisplatin-induced AKI treatment with alpha-lipoic acid (α-LA) that has previously been demonstrated to ameliorate cisplatin induced AKI.
AKI was induced in male Sprague Dawley rats using cisplatin (6mg/kg) in the presence or absence of a single dose of α-LA (100mg/kg). A panel of 12 urinary kidney damage biomarkers (CystatinC, NGAL albumin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, clusterin, KIM-1, osteopontin, total protein, cytochrome C, epidermal growth factor, interleukin-18 and malondialdehyde was examined as well as histological injury, serum creatinine and cystatin C, and clinical parameters.
Cisplatin treatment modified all parameters, except interleukin-18 and malondialdehyde, with each parameter demonstrating a different temporal profile. α-LA treatment attenuated renal tubular injury scores (P <0.05), decreased peak serum creatinine (p=0.004) and cystatin C (p=0.04), and urinary damage biomarkers of proximal tubular injury (CystatinC, NGAL, albumin, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein). Other urinary biomarkers were not modified. Neither α-LA alone, nor the cisplatin vehicle (DMSO) modified biomarker profiles.
α-LA treatment ameliorated cisplatin-induced AKI. Protection was demonstrated by reduced structural damage, improved glomerular filtration and reduced excretion of urinary biomarkers of proximal tubular damage. Effective treatment of AKI can be monitored by site and perhaps by mechanism-specific kidney damage biomarkers.
损伤生物标志物可能有助于识别急性肾损伤(AKI)的机制和部位。然而,新型AKI生物标志物的效用因情况而异,其在监测AKI治疗方面的效用尚不清楚。我们假设,选定的AKI生物标志物将有助于监测针对特定机制的治疗。我们使用一组生物标志物来监测顺铂诱导的AKI用α-硫辛酸(α-LA)治疗的情况,α-LA先前已被证明可改善顺铂诱导的AKI。
在雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠中,在有或没有单剂量α-LA(100mg/kg)的情况下,使用顺铂(6mg/kg)诱导AKI。检测了一组12种尿肾损伤生物标志物(胱抑素C、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、白蛋白、α-1-酸性糖蛋白、簇集素、肾损伤分子-1、骨桥蛋白、总蛋白、细胞色素C、表皮生长因子、白细胞介素-18和丙二醛)以及组织学损伤、血清肌酐和胱抑素C,以及临床参数。
顺铂治疗改变了所有参数,白细胞介素-18和丙二醛除外,每个参数都呈现出不同的时间变化模式。α-LA治疗减轻了肾小管损伤评分(P<0.05),降低了血清肌酐峰值(p=0.004)和胱抑素C(p=0.04),以及近端肾小管损伤的尿损伤生物标志物(胱抑素C、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、白蛋白和α-1-酸性糖蛋白)。其他尿生物标志物未改变。单独的α-LA和顺铂载体(二甲基亚砜)均未改变生物标志物谱。
α-LA治疗改善了顺铂诱导的AKI。通过减少结构损伤、改善肾小球滤过和减少近端肾小管损伤的尿生物标志物排泄证明了其保护作用。AKI的有效治疗可以通过部位以及可能通过特定机制的肾损伤生物标志物进行监测。