Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Turku & Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1277-1284. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw293.
Despite injustice at the workplace being a potential source of sleep problems, longitudinal evidence remains scarce. We examined whether changes in perceived organizational justice predicted changes in insomnia symptoms.
Data on 24 287 Finnish public sector employees (82% women), from three consecutive survey waves between 2000 and 2012, were treated as 'pseudo-trials'. Thus, the analysis of unfavourable changes in organizational justice included participants without insomnia symptoms in Waves 1 and 2, with high organizational justice in Wave 1 and high or low justice in Wave 2 (N = 6307). In the analyses of favourable changes in justice, participants had insomnia symptoms in Waves 1 and 2, low justice in Wave 1 and high or low justice in Wave 2 (N = 2903). In both analyses, the outcome was insomnia symptoms in Wave 3. We used generalized estimating equation models to analyse the data.
After adjusting for social and health-related covariates in Wave 1, unfavourable changes in relational organizational justice (i.e. fairness of managerial behaviours) were associated with increased odds of developing insomnia symptoms [odds ratio = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.30]. A favourable change in relational organizational justice was associated with lower odds of persistent insomnia symptoms (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.96). Changes in procedural justice (i.e. the fairness of decision-making procedures) were not associated with insomnia symptoms.
These data suggest that changes in perceived relational justice may affect employees' sleep quality. Decreases in the fairness of managerial behaviours were linked to increases in insomnia symptoms, whereas rises in fairness were associated with reduced insomnia symptoms.
尽管工作场所的不公正待遇可能是睡眠问题的一个潜在来源,但纵向证据仍然很少。我们研究了感知到的组织公平是否会预测失眠症状的变化。
对 24287 名芬兰公共部门员工(82%为女性)的数据进行了分析,这些员工来自 2000 年至 2012 年的三个连续调查波次。这些数据被视为“准试验”。因此,在组织公平方面不利变化的分析中,包括在第 1 波和第 2 波中没有失眠症状的参与者,他们在第 1 波中具有高组织公平性,而在第 2 波中具有高或低公平性(N=6307)。在公平方面有利变化的分析中,参与者在第 1 波和第 2 波中有失眠症状,在第 1 波中公平性低,在第 2 波中高或低公平性(N=2903)。在这两种分析中,结果都是第 3 波的失眠症状。我们使用广义估计方程模型来分析数据。
在调整了第 1 波中的社会和健康相关协变量后,关系组织公平(即管理行为的公平性)的不利变化与失眠症状发生的几率增加相关(比值比=1.15;95%置信区间[CI]1.02-1.30)。关系组织公平的有利变化与持续性失眠症状的几率降低相关(比值比=0.83;95%CI 0.71-0.96)。程序公平(即决策程序的公平性)的变化与失眠症状无关。
这些数据表明,感知到的关系公平的变化可能会影响员工的睡眠质量。管理行为公平性的降低与失眠症状的增加有关,而公平性的提高则与失眠症状的减少有关。