• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期阴茎癌患者接受挽救性(二线或后续线)全身治疗的预后和预测因素:一项回顾性多中心研究。

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study.

作者信息

Buonerba Carlo, Di Lorenzo Giuseppe, Pond Gregory, Cartenì Giacomo, Scagliarini Sarah, Rozzi Antonio, Quevedo Fernando J, Dorff Tanya, Nappi Lucia, Lanzetta Gaetano, Pagliaro Lance, Eigl Bernhard J, Naik Gurudatta, Ferro Matteo, Galdiero Mariano, De Placido Sabino, Sonpavde Guru

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of NaplesNaples, Italy; Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del MezzogiornoPortici, Italy.

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 20;7:487. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00487. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2016.00487
PMID:28066240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5168461/
Abstract

Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6-12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. : We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6-39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20-21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20-40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4-42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16-20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8-24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84-30.37, = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data.

摘要

转移性阴茎鳞状细胞癌(PSCC)的预后很差,一线治疗的中位总生存期(OS)为6至12个月,挽救性治疗时则小于6个月。鉴于这种疾病罕见,开展随机试验很困难。预后风险模型可通过比较非随机II期研究和回顾性数据中的观察结果与基于历史使用药物背景下的基线预后因素预测的结果,来辅助合理的药物研发。在这项回顾性研究中,我们构建了一个针对接受二线或后续全身治疗的PSCC患者挽救性治疗情况的预后模型,并探讨了基于治疗类型的预后差异。我们进行了病历审查,以识别在北美和欧洲各中心接受二线或后续全身治疗的局部晚期不可切除或转移性PSCC患者。主要结局是从治疗开始的OS,次要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)和缓解率(RR)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计OS。采用Cox比例风险回归,通过单变量和多变量模型确定结局的预后因素。65例患者符合条件。63例可评估患者中有17例有缓解(27.0%,95%置信区间[CI]=16.6-39.7%),中位OS和PFS分别为20周(95%CI=20-21)和12周(95%CI=12,16)。内脏转移(VM)和血红蛋白(Hb)≤10g/dl始终是OS和PFS的显著不良预后因素,Hb对缓解也有预后意义。28例无危险因素的患者中位OS(95%CI)为24周(20-40),1年OS(95%CI)为13.7%(4.4-42.7%),而37例有1个或2个危险因素的患者中位OS(95%CI)为20周(16-20),1年OS(95%CI)为6.7%(1.8-24.9%)。与其他药物相比,含西妥昔单抗的方案有缓解率改善的趋势(优势比=5.05,95%CI=0.84-30.37,P=0.077)。紫杉烷类与非紫杉烷类,以及联合治疗与单药治疗均未显示出更好的结局。该研究受样本量较小的限制。这是首个针对接受晚期PSCC挽救性全身治疗患者提出的预后分类。VM的存在和Hb≤10g/dl与不良的OS和PFS相关。西妥昔单抗似乎与更好的RR相关。该预后模型可通过改善对非随机数据中观察到的结局的解读,辅助这种罕见病的挽救性治疗药物研发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d5d/5168461/de7a81113ea4/fphar-07-00487-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d5d/5168461/de7a81113ea4/fphar-07-00487-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d5d/5168461/de7a81113ea4/fphar-07-00487-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study.晚期阴茎癌患者接受挽救性(二线或后续线)全身治疗的预后和预测因素:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 20;7:487. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00487. eCollection 2016.
2
Prognostic risk stratification derived from individual patient level data for men with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy.从接受一线全身治疗的晚期阴茎鳞状细胞癌男性患者的个体水平数据得出的预后风险分层。
Urol Oncol. 2014 May;32(4):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
3
Human papillomavirus infection affects treatment outcomes and the immune microenvironment in patients with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor-based combination therapy.人乳头瘤病毒感染影响接受程序性死亡蛋白 1 抑制剂联合治疗的晚期阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者的治疗结局和免疫微环境。
Cancer. 2024 May 1;130(9):1650-1662. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35177. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
4
Single-agent Taxane Versus Taxane-containing Combination Chemotherapy as Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.单药紫杉烷与含紫杉烷联合化疗作为晚期尿路上皮癌挽救治疗的对比
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.042. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
5
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for men with locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期阴茎鳞状细胞癌男性患者的同步放化疗
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Dec;12(6):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
6
Time from prior chemotherapy enhances prognostic risk grouping in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of pooled, prospective phase 2 trials.既往化疗时间可增强二线晚期尿路上皮癌的预后风险分组:汇总前瞻性 2 期试验的回顾性分析。
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.042. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
7
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A Sub-Analysis From Meet-URO 23 (I-RARE) Registry Study.阴茎癌患者的临床结局和预后因素:来自 Meet-URO 23(I-RARE)登记研究的亚分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Jun;22(3):102074. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102074. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Significance of preoperative prognostic nutrition index as prognostic predictors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line target therapy.术前预后营养指数作为转移性肾细胞癌患者一线靶向治疗酪氨酸激酶抑制剂预后预测指标的意义
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Nov;49(11):1955-1963. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1693-9. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
9
Combination chemotherapy with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in salvage-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A single-center, retrospective study examining the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in salvage-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.TAS-102联合贝伐单抗用于转移性结直肠癌挽救治疗的联合化疗:一项单中心回顾性研究,探讨改良格拉斯哥预后评分在转移性结直肠癌挽救治疗中的预后价值。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;11(4):390-396. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1899. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.伊立替康、奥沙利铂和雷替曲塞用于治疗晚期结直肠癌:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. doi: 10.3310/hta12150.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammation in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.阴茎鳞状细胞癌中的炎症:综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 19;26(6):2785. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062785.
2
Relationship between NLR and penile squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与阴茎鳞状细胞癌的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01569-7.
3
The Utility of Salvage Radiotherapy for an Inoperable Inguinal Recurrence of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.挽救性放疗在阴茎鳞状细胞癌腹股沟不可切除复发病例中的应用

本文引用的文献

1
Gene Expression Profiling of Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy Improves Prognostication and Identifies Potential Therapeutic Targets.高级阴茎鳞状细胞癌接受顺铂为基础的化疗后的基因表达谱分析可改善预后并确定潜在的治疗靶点。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):733-736. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
2
The evolving role of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review.单克隆抗体在晚期肾细胞癌患者治疗中不断演变的作用:一项系统评价
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016 Nov;16(11):1387-1401. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2016.1216964. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
Cureus. 2023 Nov 14;15(11):e48815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48815. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments.阴茎癌的治疗方法:护理标准与最新进展
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 2;15:165-174. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S387228. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical Profile and Predictors of Survival in Carcinoma Penis Patients.阴茎癌患者的临床特征和生存预测因素。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 28;30(5):4563-4574. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050345.
6
An update on treatment of penile cancer.阴茎癌治疗的最新进展。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Sep 24;14:17588359221127254. doi: 10.1177/17588359221127254. eCollection 2022.
7
Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Older Men With Penile Cancer: A SEER Dataset Analysis.老年阴茎癌男性的治疗模式与结局:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据集分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 29;12:926692. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926692. eCollection 2022.
8
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in penile cancer.阴茎癌中的免疫检查点抑制剂。
Future Sci OA. 2021 May 21;7(7):FSO714. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2021-0044. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Experimental Models for Studying HPV-Positive and HPV-Negative Penile Cancer: New Tools for An Old Disease.研究人乳头瘤病毒阳性和阴性阴茎癌的实验模型:一种古老疾病的新工具
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 26;13(3):460. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030460.
10
Penile cancer: potential target for immunotherapy?阴茎癌:免疫治疗的潜在靶点?
World J Urol. 2021 May;39(5):1405-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03510-7. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with disease-specific mortality in patients with penile cancer.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高与阴茎癌患者的疾病特异性死亡率相关。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:396. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2443-6.
4
Frequent PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma: potential opportunities for immunotherapeutic approaches.原发性和转移性阴茎鳞状细胞癌中频繁的程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)表达:免疫治疗方法的潜在机遇
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1706-12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw216. Epub 2016 May 23.
5
Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab.帕博利珠单抗治疗黑色素瘤患者预后的基线生物标志物
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5487-5496. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0127. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab for locally advanced penile cancer.西妥昔单抗用于局部晚期阴茎癌的新辅助化疗。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;11(4):1041. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.151945.
7
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Panitumumab Treatment for Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma When Surgery and Chemotherapy Have Failed.当手术和化疗失败时,帕尼单抗治疗晚期阴茎鳞状细胞癌。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Jun;14(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in patients with distantly metastatic penile cancer as first-line chemotherapy.多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶用于远处转移性阴茎癌患者一线化疗的II期研究。
Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 13;6(31):32212-9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4802.
10
Treatment for Metastatic Penile Cancer After First-line Chemotherapy Failure: Analysis of Response and Survival Outcomes.一线化疗失败后转移性阴茎癌的治疗:反应和生存结果分析
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1104-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.049. Epub 2015 Mar 25.