Dröscher Ariane
Department of Letters and Philosophy, University of Trento Trento, Italy.
Front Physiol. 2016 Dec 23;7:618. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00618. eCollection 2016.
From the late nineteenth century onwards, the phenomena of vision and the anatomy and physiology of the eye of marine animals induced many zoologists, ethologists, physiologists, anatomists, biochemists, and ophthalmologists to travel to the Zoological Station in Naples. Initially, their preferred research objects were fish, but it soon became evident that cephalopods have features which make them particularly suited to research. After the first studies, which outlined the anatomical structure of cephalopods' eyes and optic nerves, the research rapidly shifted to the electrophysiology and biochemistry of vision. In the twentieth century these results were integrated with behavioral tests and training techniques. Between 1909 and 1913 also the well-known debate on color vision between ophthalmologist Carl von Hess and zoologist Karl von Frisch took place in Naples. Largely unknown is that the debate also concerned cephalopods. A comparative historical analysis of these studies shows how different experimental devices, theoretical frameworks, and personal factors gave rise to two diametrically opposing views.
从19世纪末起,海洋动物的视觉现象以及眼睛的解剖学和生理学吸引了众多动物学家、动物行为学家、生理学家、解剖学家、生物化学家及眼科医生前往那不勒斯动物站。最初,他们偏爱的研究对象是鱼类,但很快就发现头足类动物具备一些使其特别适合研究的特征。在首次勾勒出头足类动物眼睛和视神经的解剖结构的研究之后,研究迅速转向视觉的电生理学和生物化学。在20世纪,这些研究结果与行为测试及训练技术相结合。1909年至1913年间,眼科医生卡尔·冯·赫斯与动物行为学家卡尔·冯·弗里施之间那场著名的关于色觉的争论也在那不勒斯展开。很大程度上不为人知的是,这场争论也涉及头足类动物。对这些研究的比较历史分析表明,不同的实验装置、理论框架及个人因素是如何导致两种截然不同的观点的。