• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Student Attitudes toward Learning Analytics in Higher Education: ".高等教育中学生对学习分析的态度:“
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959. eCollection 2016.
2
Supporting the shift to digital with student-centered learning analytics.通过以学生为中心的学习分析支持向数字化的转变。
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(1):357-361. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09882-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
Shifting to digital: a policy perspective on 'Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics' (Ifenthaler & Schumacher 2016).向数字化转型:关于“学生对学习分析隐私原则的看法”的政策视角(伊芬塔勒和舒马赫,2016年)
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(1):353-356. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09922-x. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
The Structural Consequences of Big Data-Driven Education.大数据驱动教育的结构后果。
Big Data. 2017 Jun;5(2):164-172. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0061.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation.用于面对面协作论证中自适应支持的学习分析仪表板。
Comput Educ. 2021 Apr;163:104041. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104041. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
"The Child's World": a creative and visual trigger to stimulate student enquiry in a problem based learning module.《儿童世界》:一种创造性的视觉触发因素,用于在基于问题的学习模块中激发学生的探究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):962-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
10
Adopting Learning Analytics in a First-Year Veterinarian Professional Program: What We Could Know in Advance about Student Learning Progress.采用学习分析技术于兽医专业一年级课程:我们可以预先了解学生的学习进展。
J Vet Med Educ. 2021 Dec;48(6):720-728. doi: 10.3138/jvme-2020-0045.

引用本文的文献

1
Students' Perceptions of Learning Analytics for Mental Health Support: Qualitative Study.学生对用于心理健康支持的学习分析的认知:定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e70327. doi: 10.2196/70327.
2
Health professions students' acceptance and readiness for learning analytics: lessons for educators.卫生专业学生对学习分析的接受度和准备情况:对教育者的启示。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06284-3.
3
Does education finance reduce the inequality of educational results? The mediation effect of shadow education.教育财政是否能减少教育成果的不平等?影子教育的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:1041615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041615. eCollection 2022.
4
Shifting to digital: a policy perspective on 'Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics' (Ifenthaler & Schumacher 2016).向数字化转型:关于“学生对学习分析隐私原则的看法”的政策视角(伊芬塔勒和舒马赫,2016年)
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(1):353-356. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09922-x. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
How Do B-Learning and Learning Patterns Influence Learning Outcomes?混合式学习和学习模式如何影响学习成果?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 16;8:745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745. eCollection 2017.

高等教育中学生对学习分析的态度:“

Student Attitudes toward Learning Analytics in Higher Education: ".

作者信息

Roberts Lynne D, Howell Joel A, Seaman Kristen, Gibson David C

机构信息

School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin UniversityPerth, WA, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin UniversityPerth, WA, Australia.

School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959
PMID:28066285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5165240/
Abstract

Increasingly, higher education institutions are exploring the potential of learning analytics to predict student retention, understand learning behaviors, and improve student learning through providing personalized feedback and support. The technical development of learning analytics has outpaced consideration of ethical issues surrounding their use. Of particular concern is the absence of the student voice in decision-making about learning analytics. We explored higher education students' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about big data and learning analytics through four focus groups ( = 41). Thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts identified six key themes. The first theme, "Uninformed and Uncertain," represents students' lack of knowledge about learning analytics prior to the focus groups. Following the provision of information, viewing of videos and discussion of learning analytics scenarios three further themes; "Help or Hindrance to Learning," "More than a Number," and "Impeding Independence"; represented students' perceptions of the likely impact of learning analytics on their learning. "Driving Inequality" and "Where Will it Stop?" represent ethical concerns raised by the students about the potential for inequity, bias and invasion of privacy and the need for informed consent. A key tension to emerge was how "personal" vs. "collective" purposes or principles can intersect with "uniform" vs. "autonomous" activity. The findings highlight the need the need to engage students in the decision making process about learning analytics.

摘要

高等教育机构越来越多地探索学习分析的潜力,以预测学生留校率、理解学习行为,并通过提供个性化反馈和支持来改善学生学习。学习分析的技术发展已经超过了对其使用所涉及伦理问题的考量。特别令人担忧的是,在关于学习分析的决策过程中没有学生的声音。我们通过四个焦点小组(n = 41)探讨了高等教育学生对大数据和学习分析的知识、态度及担忧。对焦点小组记录的主题分析确定了六个关键主题。第一个主题“信息不足与不确定”,代表了学生在焦点小组之前对学习分析缺乏了解。在提供信息、观看视频并讨论学习分析场景之后,又出现了三个主题:“对学习的帮助或阻碍”、“不仅仅是一个数字”以及“妨碍独立性”,代表了学生对学习分析可能对其学习产生的影响的看法。“加剧不平等”和“这将走向何方?”代表了学生对不平等、偏见和隐私侵犯可能性以及知情同意必要性提出的伦理担忧。出现的一个关键矛盾点是“个人”与“集体”目的或原则如何与“统一”与“自主”活动相互交织。研究结果凸显了让学生参与学习分析决策过程的必要性。