Dadomo Harold, Grecucci Alessandro, Giardini Irene, Ugolini Erika, Carmelita Alessandro, Panzeri Marta
Department of Neuroscience, University of ParmaParma, Italy; Parma Schema Therapy CenterParma, Italy.
Clinical and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento Rovereto, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 22;7:1987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01987. eCollection 2016.
The term emotional dysregulation refers to an impaired ability to regulate unwanted emotional states. Scientific evidence supports the idea that emotional dysregulation underlies several psychological disorders as, for example: personality disorders, bipolar disorder type II, interpersonal trauma, anxiety disorders, mood disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. Emotional dysregulation may derive from early interpersonal traumas in childhood. These early traumatic events create a persistent sensitization of the central nervous system in relation to early life stressing events. For this reason, some authors suggest a common endophenotypical origin across psychopathologies. In the last 20 years, cognitive behavioral therapy has increasingly adopted an interactive-ontogenetic view to explain the development of disorders associated to emotional dysregulation. Unfortunately, standard Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) methods are not useful in treating emotional dysregulation. A CBT-derived new approach called Schema Therapy (ST), that integrates theory and techniques from psychodynamic and emotion focused therapy, holds the promise to fill this gap in cognitive literature. In this model, psychopathology is viewed as the interaction between the innate temperament of the child and the early experiences of deprivation or frustration of the subject's basic needs. This deprivation may lead to develop early maladaptive schemas (EMS), and maladaptive Modes. In the present paper we point out that EMSs and Modes are associated with either dysregulated emotions or with dysregulatory strategies that produce and maintain problematic emotional responses. Thanks to a special focus on the therapeutic relationship and emotion focused-experiential techniques, this approach successfully treats severe emotional dysregulation. In this paper, we make several comparisons between the main ideas of ST and the science of emotion regulation, and we present how to conceptualize pathological phenomena in terms of failed regulation and some of the ST strategies and techniques to foster successful regulation in patients.
情绪失调这一术语指调节不良情绪状态的能力受损。科学证据支持这样一种观点,即情绪失调是多种心理障碍的基础,例如:人格障碍、II型双相情感障碍、人际创伤、焦虑症、情绪障碍和创伤后应激障碍。情绪失调可能源于童年早期的人际创伤。这些早期创伤事件会使中枢神经系统对早期生活应激事件产生持续的敏感化。因此,一些作者提出各种精神病理学存在共同的内表型起源。在过去20年里,认知行为疗法越来越多地采用一种互动发生学观点来解释与情绪失调相关的障碍的发展。不幸的是,标准的认知行为疗法(CBT)方法对治疗情绪失调并无用处。一种源自CBT的新方法——图式疗法(ST),它整合了精神动力学疗法和情绪聚焦疗法的理论与技术,有望填补认知文献中的这一空白。在这个模型中,精神病理学被视为儿童的先天气质与主体基本需求的剥夺或挫折的早期经历之间的相互作用。这种剥夺可能导致早期适应不良图式(EMS)和适应不良模式的形成。在本文中,我们指出EMS和模式与失调情绪或产生并维持有问题情绪反应的失调策略相关。由于特别关注治疗关系和情绪聚焦体验技术,这种方法成功地治疗了严重的情绪失调。在本文中,我们对ST的主要观点与情绪调节科学进行了若干比较,并展示了如何从调节失败的角度概念化病理现象,以及一些ST策略和技术如何促进患者的成功调节。