Epidemiology,Biostatistics and Prevention Institute,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Jun;27(3):288-300. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001086. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Previous research failed to uncover a replicable dimensional structure underlying the symptoms of depression. We aimed to examine two neglected methodological issues in this research: (a) adjusting symptom correlations for overall depression severity; and (b) analysing general population samples v. subsamples of currently depressed individuals.
Using population-based cross-sectional and longitudinal data from two nations (Switzerland, 5883 young men; USA, 2174 young men and 2244 young women) we assessed the dimensions of the nine DSM-IV depression symptoms in young adults. In each general-population sample and each subsample of currently depressed participants, we conducted a standardised process of three analytical steps, based on exploratory and confirmatory factor and bifactor analysis, to reveal any replicable dimensional structure underlying symptom correlations while controlling for overall depression severity.
We found no evidence of a replicable dimensional structure across samples when adjusting symptom correlations for overall depression severity. In the general-population samples, symptoms correlated strongly and a single dimension of depression severity was revealed. Among depressed participants, symptom correlations were surprisingly weak and no replicable dimensions were identified, regardless of severity-adjustment.
First, caution is warranted when considering studies assessing dimensions of depression because general population-based studies and studies of depressed individuals generate different data that can lead to different conclusions. This problem likely generalises to other models based on the symptoms' inter-relationships such as network models. Second, whereas the overall severity aligns individuals on a continuum of disorder intensity that allows non-affected individuals to be distinguished from affected individuals, the clinical evaluation and treatment of depressed individuals should focus directly on each individual's symptom profile.
先前的研究未能揭示出抑郁症症状背后可复制的维度结构。我们旨在检验该研究中两个被忽视的方法学问题:(a)调整症状相关性以反映总体抑郁严重程度;以及(b)分析一般人群样本与当前抑郁个体的子样本。
我们使用来自两个国家(瑞士,5883 名年轻男性;美国,2174 名年轻男性和 2244 名年轻女性)的基于人群的横断面和纵向数据,评估了年轻人中九种 DSM-IV 抑郁症状的维度。在每个一般人群样本和每个当前抑郁参与者的子样本中,我们基于探索性和验证性因子和双因子分析进行了标准化的三步分析过程,以揭示在控制总体抑郁严重程度的情况下,症状相关性背后是否存在可复制的维度结构。
当我们调整症状相关性以反映总体抑郁严重程度时,在样本间并未发现可复制的维度结构的证据。在一般人群样本中,症状相关性较强,揭示出一个单一的抑郁严重程度维度。在抑郁参与者中,症状相关性出人意料地较弱,且无论是否进行严重程度调整,都未识别出可复制的维度。
首先,在考虑评估抑郁维度的研究时需要谨慎,因为基于一般人群的研究和针对抑郁个体的研究产生的数据不同,可能会得出不同的结论。这个问题可能普遍适用于基于症状相互关系的其他模型,如网络模型。其次,虽然总体严重程度将个体排列在疾病严重程度的连续体上,从而能够区分未受影响的个体和受影响的个体,但对抑郁个体的临床评估和治疗应直接关注每个个体的症状特征。