Suppr超能文献

新见解:一般人群与抑郁个体亚组中 DSM-IV 抑郁症状的相关结构。

New insights into the correlation structure of DSM-IV depression symptoms in the general population v. subsamples of depressed individuals.

机构信息

Epidemiology,Biostatistics and Prevention Institute,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.

出版信息

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Jun;27(3):288-300. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001086. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Abstract

AIMS

Previous research failed to uncover a replicable dimensional structure underlying the symptoms of depression. We aimed to examine two neglected methodological issues in this research: (a) adjusting symptom correlations for overall depression severity; and (b) analysing general population samples v. subsamples of currently depressed individuals.

METHODS

Using population-based cross-sectional and longitudinal data from two nations (Switzerland, 5883 young men; USA, 2174 young men and 2244 young women) we assessed the dimensions of the nine DSM-IV depression symptoms in young adults. In each general-population sample and each subsample of currently depressed participants, we conducted a standardised process of three analytical steps, based on exploratory and confirmatory factor and bifactor analysis, to reveal any replicable dimensional structure underlying symptom correlations while controlling for overall depression severity.

RESULTS

We found no evidence of a replicable dimensional structure across samples when adjusting symptom correlations for overall depression severity. In the general-population samples, symptoms correlated strongly and a single dimension of depression severity was revealed. Among depressed participants, symptom correlations were surprisingly weak and no replicable dimensions were identified, regardless of severity-adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

First, caution is warranted when considering studies assessing dimensions of depression because general population-based studies and studies of depressed individuals generate different data that can lead to different conclusions. This problem likely generalises to other models based on the symptoms' inter-relationships such as network models. Second, whereas the overall severity aligns individuals on a continuum of disorder intensity that allows non-affected individuals to be distinguished from affected individuals, the clinical evaluation and treatment of depressed individuals should focus directly on each individual's symptom profile.

摘要

目的

先前的研究未能揭示出抑郁症症状背后可复制的维度结构。我们旨在检验该研究中两个被忽视的方法学问题:(a)调整症状相关性以反映总体抑郁严重程度;以及(b)分析一般人群样本与当前抑郁个体的子样本。

方法

我们使用来自两个国家(瑞士,5883 名年轻男性;美国,2174 名年轻男性和 2244 名年轻女性)的基于人群的横断面和纵向数据,评估了年轻人中九种 DSM-IV 抑郁症状的维度。在每个一般人群样本和每个当前抑郁参与者的子样本中,我们基于探索性和验证性因子和双因子分析进行了标准化的三步分析过程,以揭示在控制总体抑郁严重程度的情况下,症状相关性背后是否存在可复制的维度结构。

结果

当我们调整症状相关性以反映总体抑郁严重程度时,在样本间并未发现可复制的维度结构的证据。在一般人群样本中,症状相关性较强,揭示出一个单一的抑郁严重程度维度。在抑郁参与者中,症状相关性出人意料地较弱,且无论是否进行严重程度调整,都未识别出可复制的维度。

结论

首先,在考虑评估抑郁维度的研究时需要谨慎,因为基于一般人群的研究和针对抑郁个体的研究产生的数据不同,可能会得出不同的结论。这个问题可能普遍适用于基于症状相互关系的其他模型,如网络模型。其次,虽然总体严重程度将个体排列在疾病严重程度的连续体上,从而能够区分未受影响的个体和受影响的个体,但对抑郁个体的临床评估和治疗应直接关注每个个体的症状特征。

相似文献

3
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.PHQ-8作为一般人群当前抑郁状况的一种测量工具。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
5
Familiality of symptom dimensions in depression.抑郁症症状维度的家族性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 May;61(5):468-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.468.
8
The depressive spectrum: diagnostic classification and course.抑郁谱系:诊断分类与病程
J Affect Disord. 1997 Aug;45(1-2):31-9; discussion 39-40. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00057-8.
9
No evidence of seasonal variation in mild forms of depression.没有证据表明轻度抑郁症有季节性变化。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;62:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis: The Oblique Case.探索性双因素分析:斜交情况。
Psychometrika. 2012 Jul;77(3):442-54. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9269-1. Epub 2012 May 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验