• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Integrated Screw Cages: Intrinsic Load Generation, Subsidence, and Torsional Stability.前路腰椎椎间融合一体化螺钉融合器:内在负荷产生、下沉及扭转稳定性
Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):191-197. doi: 10.1111/os.12283. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.独立式聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与一体式螺钉的生物力学评估。
Spine J. 2013 Jan;13(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
3
Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads.补充经椎板小关节螺钉固定对生理压缩预负荷下单节段前路腰椎椎间融合器稳定性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1731-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134570.08901.30.
4
Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.腰椎前路椎间融合术的有限元分析:螺纹圆柱融合器与椎弓根螺钉固定
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):2558-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cdd8.
5
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
6
Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.腰椎后路椎间融合器的节段稳定性和抗压强度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1899-907. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00007.
7
Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.在体外腰椎滑脱模型中,对可扩张外侧椎间融合器和带后路内固定的静态经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合器进行生物力学分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):32-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14636. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
8
The effect of interbody fusion cage design on the stability of the instrumented spine in response to cyclic loading: an experimental study.椎间融合 cage 设计对脊柱内固定节段在循环加载下稳定性的影响:一项实验研究。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1867-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.评估一种带有一体式螺钉的腰椎椎间融合器作为独立固定装置的性能。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):351-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b15d00.
10
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:各种内固定技术对腰椎灵活性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of bone density and integrated screw configuration on standalone anterior lumbar interbody construct strength.骨密度和一体式螺钉配置对独立前路腰椎椎间融合器结构强度的影响。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Apr 27;18:100325. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100325. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) as an option for recurrent disc herniations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)作为复发性椎间盘突出症的一种治疗选择:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Spine Surg. 2017 Dec;3(4):587-595. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.11.04.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease: A pilot study and a literature review.单纯前路腰椎椎间融合术与后路器械固定治疗退行性椎间盘疾病的临床疗效:一项初步研究及文献综述
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;133:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
2
Biomechanical characteristics of an integrated lumbar interbody fusion device.一种一体化腰椎椎间融合器的生物力学特性
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1001. eCollection 2014.
3
Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中单独锚定椎间融合器与带钢板椎间融合器的比较:一项为期2年随访的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1547-4. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
4
Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.三种独立腰椎融合器的生物力学比较——三维有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Oct 2;14:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-281.
5
Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.使用聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2进行单纯前路腰椎椎间融合的融合及沉降率
Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2869-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
6
Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis.前路腰椎体间融合的生物力学比较:单纯椎间融合器与带椎弓根螺钉固定的椎间融合器——有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 26;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-220.
7
Implantable sensor technology: measuring bone and joint biomechanics of daily life in vivo.可植入传感器技术:测量日常生活中体内骨骼和关节的生物力学。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Jan 31;15(1):203. doi: 10.1186/ar4138.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.独立式聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与一体式螺钉的生物力学评估。
Spine J. 2013 Jan;13(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
Pullout analysis of a lumbar plate with varying screw orientations: experimental and computational analyses.不同螺钉方向腰椎板的拔出分析:实验与计算分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):E942-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318254155a.
10
Are stand-alone cages sufficient for anterior lumbar interbody fusion?单纯使用 Cage 进行前路腰椎间融合术是否足够?
Orthop Surg. 2012 Feb;4(1):11-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00164.x.

前路腰椎椎间融合一体化螺钉融合器:内在负荷产生、下沉及扭转稳定性

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Integrated Screw Cages: Intrinsic Load Generation, Subsidence, and Torsional Stability.

作者信息

Assem Yusuf, Pelletier Matthew H, Mobbs Ralph J, Phan Kevin, Walsh William R

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.

Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):191-197. doi: 10.1111/os.12283. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1111/os.12283
PMID:28067466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6584271/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a repeatable idealized in vitro model to evaluate the effects of key design features and integrated screw fixation on unloaded surface engagement, subsidence, and torsional stability.

METHODS

We evaluated four different stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages with two, three, and four screw designs. Polyurethane (saw-bone) foam blocks were used to simulate the vertebral bone. Fuji Film was used to measure the contact footprint, average pressure, and load generated by fixating the cages with screws. Subsidence was tested by axially loading the constructs at 10 N/s to 400 N and torsional load was applied +/-1 Nm for 10 cycles to assess stability. Outcome measures included total subsidence and maximal torsional angle range.

RESULTS

Cages 1, 2, and 4 were symmetrical and produced similar results in terms of contact footprint, average pressure, and load. The addition of integrated screws into the cage-bone block construct demonstrated a clear trend towards decreased subsidence. Cage 2 with surface titanium angled ridges and a keel produced the greatest subsidence with and without screws, significantly more than all other cages ( P < 0.05). Angular rotation was not significantly affected by the addition of screws ( P < 0.066). A statistically significant correlation existed between subsidence and reduced angular rotation across all cage constructs ( P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Each stand-alone cage featured unique surface characteristics, which resulted in differing cage-foam interface engagement, influencing the subsidence and torsional angle. Increased subsidence significantly reduced the torsional angle across all cage constructs.

摘要

目的

建立一个可重复的理想化体外模型,以评估关键设计特征和一体化螺钉固定对无负载时表面接触、下沉及扭转稳定性的影响。

方法

我们评估了四种不同的独立式前路腰椎椎间融合器(ALIF),其螺钉设计分别为两个、三个和四个。使用聚氨酯(锯末)泡沫块模拟椎骨。用富士胶片测量通过螺钉固定椎间融合器产生的接触面积、平均压力和负载。通过以10N/s的轴向加载力将构建体加载至400N来测试下沉情况,并施加±1Nm的扭转载荷持续10个循环以评估稳定性。结果测量指标包括总下沉量和最大扭转角度范围。

结果

椎间融合器1、2和4是对称的,在接触面积、平均压力和负载方面产生了相似的结果。在椎间融合器 - 骨块构建体中添加一体化螺钉显示出下沉减少的明显趋势。带有表面钛制斜脊和龙骨的椎间融合器2在有螺钉和无螺钉的情况下下沉量最大,显著高于所有其他椎间融合器(P < 0.05)。添加螺钉对角度旋转没有显著影响(P < 0.066)。在所有椎间融合器构建体中,下沉与角度旋转减少之间存在统计学上的显著相关性(P = 0.018)。

结论

每个独立式椎间融合器都具有独特的表面特征,这导致了不同的椎间融合器 - 泡沫界面接触情况,影响了下沉和扭转角度。所有椎间融合器构建体中,下沉增加显著降低了扭转角度。