Suppr超能文献

建立质子治疗的循证适应证:当前临床试验概述。

Establishing Evidence-Based Indications for Proton Therapy: An Overview of Current Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.045. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review and assess ongoing proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trials and to identify major gaps.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Active PBT clinical trials were identified from clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Registry. Data on clinical trial disease site, age group, projected patient enrollment, expected start and end dates, study type, and funding source were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 122 active PBT clinical trials were identified, with target enrollment of >42,000 patients worldwide. Ninety-six trials (79%), with a median planned sample size of 68, were classified as interventional studies. Observational studies accounted for 21% of trials but 71% (n=29,852) of planned patient enrollment. The most common PBT clinical trials focus on gastrointestinal tract tumors (21%, n=26), tumors of the central nervous system (15%, n=18), and prostate cancer (12%, n=15). Five active studies (lung, esophagus, head and neck, prostate, breast) will randomize patients between protons and photons, and 3 will randomize patients between protons and carbon ion therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBT clinical trial portfolio is expanding rapidly. Although the majority of ongoing studies are interventional, the majority of patients will be accrued to observational studies. Future efforts should focus on strategies to encourage optimal patient enrollment and retention, with an emphasis on randomized, controlled trials, which will require support from third-party payers. Results of ongoing PBT studies should be evaluated in terms of comparative effectiveness, as well as incremental effectiveness and value offered by PBT in comparison with conventional radiation modalities.

摘要

目的

回顾和评估正在进行的质子束治疗(PBT)临床试验,并确定主要差距。

方法和材料

从 clinicaltrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验平台登记处确定了正在进行的质子束治疗临床试验。提取了临床试验疾病部位、年龄组、预计入组患者人数、预期开始和结束日期、研究类型和资金来源的数据。

结果

共确定了 122 项正在进行的质子束治疗临床试验,预计在全球范围内招募超过 42000 名患者。96 项(79%)试验(中位数计划样本量为 68)被归类为干预性研究。观察性研究占试验的 21%,但占计划入组患者的 71%(n=29852)。最常见的质子束治疗临床试验侧重于胃肠道肿瘤(21%,n=26)、中枢神经系统肿瘤(15%,n=18)和前列腺癌(12%,n=15)。5 项正在进行的研究(肺癌、食管癌、头颈部癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌)将在质子和光子之间随机分配患者,3 项将在质子和碳离子治疗之间随机分配患者。

结论

质子束治疗临床试验组合正在迅速扩大。尽管大多数正在进行的研究都是干预性的,但大多数患者将被纳入观察性研究。未来的工作应侧重于鼓励最佳患者入组和保留的策略,重点是随机对照试验,这将需要第三方支付者的支持。应根据比较有效性以及质子束治疗与常规放射治疗模式相比提供的额外有效性和价值来评估正在进行的质子束治疗研究的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验