Ebeling K, Bilek K, Johannsmeyer D, Rohde E, Wagner F, Buchmann J, Heiner M, Johannsmeyer B, Glodde L, Rüdiger K D
Klinik und Poliklinik für Onkologie-Bereich Medizin (Charité) der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 Sep;49(9):776-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036084.
A retrospective multicentre study to investigate diagnosis, treatment and end results of treatment of cervical cancer stage Ia, was carried out in 6 departments of gynaecological oncology. After reclassification by a reference pathologist, among the 936 cervical cancer cases primarily diagnosed and treated as stage Ia between 1970 and 1980, only 530 (56.6%) met the criteria of microinvasive cancer stage Ia. Misclassifications concerned all participating centres with statistically significant differences amongst them. Overdiagnosis (reference diagnosis only CIN I-III, 42.5%) was more frequent than underdiagnosis (reference diagnosis stage Ib--0.9%). In comparison to 1970-74, in the period 1975-80 a significant increase of cases detected asymptomatically (86.5%) was observed. The percentage of cases primarily diagnosed by cone biopsy, also increased significantly and amounted to 71.2%. Patients with cervical cancer stage Ia were most frequently treated by surgery alone (93.2%). Radiotherapy alone did not play any important role (5.7%). There were only a few cases treated by combined surgery and radiotherapy (5.7%) with a decreasing trend over time. Women under the age of 45 years were significantly more frequently treated by the conservative method (cone biopsy, simple hysterectomy) than older ones, without any significant relation between depth of invasion and radicality of treatment. A total of 19 (14 local, 5 lymph node) recurrences were diagnosed between 9 and 110 months after primary treatment. Local recurrences could be observed more frequently after limited than extended treatment. There was no significant relation between depth of invasion and frequency of recurrences, but the latter were significantly increased in cases with histologically proven invasion of blood or lymph vessels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一项回顾性多中心研究在6个妇科肿瘤科室开展,旨在调查宫颈癌Ia期的诊断、治疗及治疗结局。经参考病理学家重新分类后,在1970年至1980年间最初诊断和治疗为Ia期的936例宫颈癌病例中,只有530例(56.6%)符合微小浸润癌Ia期标准。错误分类涉及所有参与中心,各中心之间存在统计学显著差异。过度诊断(参考诊断仅为CIN I - III,42.5%)比漏诊(参考诊断为Ib期,0.9%)更常见。与1970 - 1974年相比,1975 - 1980年无症状检测到的病例显著增加(86.5%)。最初通过锥形活检诊断的病例百分比也显著增加,达71.2%。宫颈癌Ia期患者最常仅接受手术治疗(93.2%)。单纯放疗未起重要作用(5.7%)。仅少数病例接受手术与放疗联合治疗(5.7%),且随时间呈下降趋势。45岁以下女性比年长女性更常采用保守治疗方法(锥形活检、单纯子宫切除术),浸润深度与治疗的根治性之间无显著关联。在初次治疗后9至110个月间共诊断出19例复发(14例局部复发,5例淋巴结复发)。局限性治疗后比广泛性治疗后更常观察到局部复发。浸润深度与复发频率之间无显著关联,但在组织学证实有血管或淋巴管浸润的病例中,复发显著增加。(摘要截断于250字)