O'Connor Stephen S, Shain Lindsey M, Whitehill Jennifer M, Ebel Beth E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, 408 E. Chestnut Ave, Suite 610, Louisville, KY 40202, United States.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Western Kentucky University, 3074 Gary Ransdell Hall, 1906 College Heights Blvd., Bowling Green, KY, 42101, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.016. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
Previous research suggests that anticipation of incoming phone calls or messages and impulsivity are significantly associated with motor vehicle crash. We took a more explanative approach to investigate a conceptual model regarding the direct and indirect effect of compulsive cell phone use and impulsive personality traits on crash risk.
We recruited a sample of 307 undergraduate college students to complete an online survey that included measures of cell phone use, impulsivity, and history of motor vehicle crash. Using a structural equation model, we examined the direct and indirect relationships between factors of the Cell Phone Overuse Scale-II (CPOS-II), impulsivity, in-vehicle phone use, and severity and frequency of previous motor vehicle crash. Self-reported miles driven per week and year in college were included as covariates in the model.
Our findings suggest that anticipation of incoming communication has a direct association with greater in-vehicle phone use, but was not directly or indirectly associated with increasing risk of previous motor vehicle crash. Of the three latent factors comprising the CPOS-II, only anticipation was significantly associated with elevated cell phone use while driving. Greater impulsivity and use of in-vehicle cell phone use while driving were directly and significantly associated with greater risk of motor vehicle crash.
Anticipation of incoming cellular contacts (calls or texts) is associated with greater in-vehicle phone use, while greater in-vehicle cell phone use and impulsive traits are associated with elevated risk of motor vehicle crashes.
先前的研究表明,对来电或信息的预期以及冲动性与机动车碰撞显著相关。我们采用了一种更具解释性的方法来研究一个概念模型,该模型涉及强迫性手机使用和冲动性人格特质对碰撞风险的直接和间接影响。
我们招募了307名大学生作为样本,让他们完成一项在线调查,该调查包括手机使用、冲动性和机动车碰撞史的测量。使用结构方程模型,我们检验了手机过度使用量表-II(CPOS-II)的各因素、冲动性、车内手机使用以及既往机动车碰撞的严重程度和频率之间的直接和间接关系。模型中纳入了自我报告的每周和每年在大学期间驾驶的英里数作为协变量。
我们的研究结果表明,对来电的预期与更多的车内手机使用直接相关,但与既往机动车碰撞风险的增加没有直接或间接关联。在构成CPOS-II的三个潜在因素中,只有预期与驾驶时手机使用增加显著相关。更高的冲动性和驾驶时车内手机的使用与更高的机动车碰撞风险直接且显著相关。
对来电(电话或短信)的预期与更多的车内手机使用相关,而更多的车内手机使用和冲动特质与更高的机动车碰撞风险相关。