Suppr超能文献

利用来自津巴布韦的定性研究结果剖析早期男婴包皮环切术的决策过程

Unpacking early infant male circumcision decision-making using qualitative findings from Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Mavhu Webster, Hatzold Karin, Ncube Getrude, Fernando Shamiso, Mangenah Collin, Chatora Kumbirai, Dhlamini Roy, Mugurungi Owen, Ticklay Ismail, Cowan Frances M

机构信息

Centre for Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), 9 Monmouth Road Avondale West, Harare, Zimbabwe.

University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0111-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early infant male circumcision (EIMC) has been identified as a key HIV prevention intervention. Exploring the decision-making process for adoption of EIMC for HIV prevention among parents and other key stakeholders is critical for designing effective demand creation interventions to maximize uptake, roll out and impact in preventing HIV. This paper describes key players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process.

METHODS

Two complementary qualitative studies explored hypothetical and actual acceptability of EIMC in Zimbabwe. The first study (conducted 2010) explored hypothetical acceptability of EIMC among parents and wider family through focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 24). The follow-up study (conducted 2013) explored actual acceptability of EIMC among parents through twelve in-depth interviews (IDIs), four FGDs and short telephone interviews with additional parents (n = 95). Short statements from the telephone interviews were handwritten. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English. All data were thematically coded.

RESULTS

Study findings suggested that EIMC decision-making involved a discussion between the infant's parents. Male and female participants of all age groups acknowledged that the father had the final say. However, discussions around EIMC uptake suggested that the infant's mother could sometimes covertly influence the father's decision in the direction she favoured. Discussions also suggested that fathers who had undergone voluntary medical male circumcision were more likely to adopt EIMC for their sons, compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. Mothers-in-law/grandparents were reported to have considerable influence. Based on study findings, we describe key EIMC decision makers and attempt to illustrate alternative outcomes of their key actions and decisions around EIMC within the Zimbabwean context.

CONCLUSIONS

These complementary studies identified critical players, decisions and actions involved in the EIMC decision-making process. Findings on who influences decisions regarding EIMC in the Zimbabwean context highlighted the need for EIMC demand generation interventions to target fathers, mothers, grandmothers, other family members and the wider community.

摘要

背景

早期婴儿男性包皮环切术(EIMC)已被确定为一项关键的艾滋病毒预防干预措施。探索父母及其他关键利益相关者在采用EIMC预防艾滋病毒方面的决策过程,对于设计有效的需求创造干预措施以最大限度地提高接受率、推广并发挥预防艾滋病毒的影响至关重要。本文描述了EIMC决策过程中涉及的关键参与者、决策和行动。

方法

两项互补的定性研究探讨了EIMC在津巴布韦的假设可接受性和实际可接受性。第一项研究(于2010年开展)通过焦点小组讨论(FGD,共24组)探讨了父母及更广泛家庭对EIMC的假设可接受性。后续研究(于2013年开展)通过12次深入访谈(IDI)、4次FGD以及与其他父母的简短电话访谈(共95人)探讨了父母对EIMC的实际可接受性。电话访谈的简短陈述被手写记录。FGD和IDI进行了录音、转录并翻译成英文。所有数据进行了主题编码。

结果

研究结果表明,EIMC决策涉及婴儿父母之间的讨论。所有年龄组的男性和女性参与者都承认父亲有最终决定权。然而,关于采用EIMC的讨论表明,婴儿的母亲有时可能会暗中影响父亲朝着她所倾向的方向做出决定。讨论还表明,与未接受包皮环切术的父亲相比,接受过自愿医学男性包皮环切术的父亲更有可能为儿子采用EIMC。据报道,岳母/祖父母有相当大的影响力。基于研究结果,我们描述了EIMC的关键决策者,并试图说明他们围绕EIMC在津巴布韦背景下的关键行动和决策的不同结果。

结论

这些互补研究确定了EIMC决策过程中涉及的关键参与者、决策和行动。关于在津巴布韦背景下谁影响EIMC决策的研究结果凸显了EIMC需求生成干预措施针对父亲、母亲、祖母、其他家庭成员和更广泛社区的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f0/5223435/052c5941195f/12914_2016_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验