Suppr超能文献

关于婴儿早期与青少年早期男性包皮环切术的态度及决策:赞比亚和津巴布韦可持续性艾滋病毒预防策略的需求方见解

Attitudes and decision-making about early-infant versus early-adolescent male circumcision: Demand-side insights for sustainable HIV prevention strategies in Zambia and Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Sgaier Sema K, Sharma Sunny, Eletskaya Maria, Prasad Ram, Mugurungi Owen, Tambatamba Bushimbwa, Ncube Getrude, Xaba Sinokuthemba, Nanga Alice, Gumede-Moyo Sehlulekile, Kretschmer Steve

机构信息

Surgo Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181411. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

As countries approach their scale-up targets for the voluntary medical male circumcision program for HIV prevention, they are strategizing and planning for the sustainability phase to follow. Global guidance recommends circumcising adolescent (below 14 years) and/or early infant boys (aged 0-60 days), and countries need to consider several factors before prioritizing a cohort for their sustainability phase. We provide community and healthcare provider-side insights on attitudes and decision-making process as a key input for this strategic decision in Zambia and Zimbabwe. We studied expectant parents, parents of infant boys (aged 0-60 days), family members and neo-natal and ante-natal healthcare providers in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Our integrated methodology consisted of in-depth qualitative and quantitative one-on-one interviews, and a simulated-decision-making game, to uncover attitudes towards, and the decision-making process for, early adolescent or early infant medical circumcision (EAMC or EIMC). In both countries, parents viewed early infancy and early adolescence as equally ideal ages for circumcision (38% EIMC vs. 37% EAMC in Zambia; 24% vs. 27% in Zimbabwe). If offered for free, about half of Zambian parents and almost 2 in 5 Zimbabwean parents indicated they would likely circumcise their infant boy; however, half of parents in each country perceived that the community would not accept EIMC. Nurses believed their facilities currently could not absorb EIMC services and that they would have limited ability to influence fathers, who were seen as having the primary decision-making authority. Our analysis suggests that EAMC is more accepted by the community than EIMC and is the path of least resistance for the sustainability phase of VMMC. However, parents or community members do not reject EIMC. Should countries choose to prioritize this cohort for their sustainability phase, a number of barriers around information, decision-making by parents, and supply side will need to be addressed.

摘要

随着各国接近其扩大自愿男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病项目的目标规模,它们正在为后续的可持续发展阶段制定战略和规划。全球指南建议对青少年(14岁以下)和/或早期男婴(0至60天)进行包皮环切术,各国在为其可持续发展阶段确定优先队列之前需要考虑几个因素。我们提供了社区和医疗服务提供者方面关于态度和决策过程的见解,作为赞比亚和津巴布韦这一战略决策的关键输入。我们研究了赞比亚和津巴布韦的准父母、男婴(0至60天)的父母、家庭成员以及新生儿和产前医疗服务提供者。我们的综合方法包括深入的定性和定量一对一访谈以及一个模拟决策游戏,以揭示对青少年早期或婴儿早期医学包皮环切术(EAMC或EIMC)的态度和决策过程。在这两个国家,父母认为婴儿早期和青少年早期是同样理想的包皮环切年龄(赞比亚为38%的EIMC对37%的EAMC;津巴布韦为24%对27%)。如果免费提供,约一半的赞比亚父母和近五分之二的津巴布韦父母表示他们可能会为自己的男婴进行包皮环切术;然而,每个国家都有一半的父母认为社区不会接受EIMC。护士们认为他们的机构目前无法接纳EIMC服务,并且他们影响被视为具有主要决策权的父亲的能力有限。我们的分析表明,社区对EAMC的接受程度高于EIMC,并且这是VMMC可持续发展阶段阻力最小的途径。然而,父母或社区成员并不排斥EIMC。如果各国选择在其可持续发展阶段将这一队列作为优先事项,那么在信息、父母决策以及供应方面的一些障碍将需要得到解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb4b/5531536/6c186480111f/pone.0181411.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验