Marini Francesca, Squeri Valentina, Morasso Pietro, Campus Claudio, Konczak Jürgen, Masia Lorenzo
Motor Learning and Robotic Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova, 16163, Italy.
Human Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Center for Clinical Movement Science, University of Minnesota, USA, 1900 University Ave S E, Minneapolis, 24105, USA.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jan 9;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0215-9.
Several neurodevelopmental disorders and brain injuries in children have been associated with proprioceptive dysfunction that will negatively affect their movement. Unfortunately, there is lack of reliable and objective clinical examination protocols and our current knowledge of how proprioception evolves in typically developing children is still sparse.
Using a robotic exoskeleton, we investigated proprioceptive acuity of the wrist in a group of 49 typically developing healthy children (8-15 years), and a group of 40 young adults. Without vision participants performed an ipsilateral wrist joint position matching task that required them to reproduce (match) a previously experienced target position. All three joint degrees-of-freedom of the wrist/hand complex were assessed. Accuracy and precision were evaluated as a measure of proprioceptive acuity. The cross-sectional data indicating the time course of development of acuity were then fitted by four models in order to determine which function best describes developmental changes in proprioception across age.
First, the robot-aided assessment proved to be an easy to administer method for objectively measuring proprioceptive acuity in both children and adult populations. Second, proprioceptive acuity continued to develop throughout middle childhood and early adolescence, improving by more than 50% with respect to the youngest group. Adult levels of performance were reached approximately by the age of 12 years. An inverse-root function best described the development of proprioceptive acuity across the age groups. Third, wrist/forearm proprioception is anisotropic across the three DoFs with the Abduction/Adduction exhibiting a higher level of acuity than those of Flexion/extension and Pronation/Supination. This anisotropy did not change across development.
Proprioceptive development for the wrist continues well into early adolescence. Our normative data obtained trough this novel robot-aided assessment method provide a basis against which proprioceptive function of pediatric population can be compared. This may aid the design of more effective sensorimotor intervention programs.
儿童的几种神经发育障碍和脑损伤与本体感觉功能障碍有关,这会对他们的运动产生负面影响。不幸的是,缺乏可靠且客观的临床检查方案,而且我们目前对正常发育儿童本体感觉如何发展的了解仍然很少。
我们使用机器人外骨骼,对49名正常发育的健康儿童(8 - 15岁)和40名年轻人的手腕本体感觉敏锐度进行了研究。在无视觉的情况下,参与者执行同侧腕关节位置匹配任务,要求他们重现(匹配)先前经历的目标位置。对手腕/手部复合体的所有三个关节自由度进行了评估。准确性和精确性被评估为本体感觉敏锐度的指标。然后用四种模型拟合表明敏锐度发展时间进程的横断面数据,以确定哪种函数最能描述不同年龄段本体感觉的发育变化。
首先,机器人辅助评估被证明是一种易于实施的方法,可客观测量儿童和成人的本体感觉敏锐度。其次,本体感觉敏锐度在童年中期和青春期早期持续发展,与最年幼组相比提高了50%以上。大约在12岁时达到成人水平的表现。反平方根函数最能描述不同年龄组本体感觉敏锐度的发展。第三,手腕/前臂本体感觉在三个自由度上是各向异性的,外展/内收的敏锐度水平高于屈伸和旋前/旋后。这种各向异性在发育过程中没有变化。
手腕的本体感觉发育一直持续到青春期早期。我们通过这种新型机器人辅助评估方法获得的规范数据为比较儿童群体的本体感觉功能提供了依据。这可能有助于设计更有效的感觉运动干预方案。