Arsenault Catherine, Harper Sam, Nandi Arijit, Mendoza Rodríguez José M, Hansen Peter M, Johri Mira
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Vaccine. 2017 Feb 7;35(6):951-959. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.041. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
(1) To conduct a systematic analysis of inequalities in childhood vaccination coverage in Gavi-supported countries; (2) to comparatively assess alternative measurement approaches and how they may affect cross-country comparisons of the level of inequalities.
Using the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2005-2014) in 45 Gavi-supported countries, we measured inequalities in vaccination coverage across seven dimensions of social stratification and of vulnerability to poor health outcomes. We quantified inequalities using pairwise comparisons (risk differences and ratios) and whole spectrum measures (slope and relative indices of inequality). To contrast measurement approaches, we pooled the estimates using random-effects meta-analyses, ranked countries by the magnitude of inequality and compared agreement in country ranks.
At the aggregate level, maternal education, multidimensional poverty, and wealth index poverty were the dimensions associated with the largest inequalities. In 36 out of 45 countries, inequalities were substantial, with a difference in coverage of 10 percentage points or more between the top and bottom of at least one of these social dimensions. Important inequalities by child sex, child malnutrition and urban/rural residence were also found in a smaller set of countries. The magnitude of inequality and ranking of countries differed across dimension and depending on the measure used. Pairwise comparisons could not be estimated in certain countries. The slope and relative indices of inequality were estimated in all countries and produced more stable country rankings, and should thus facilitate more reliable international comparisons.
Inequalities in vaccination coverage persist in a large majority of Gavi-supported countries. Inequalities should be monitored across multiple dimensions of vulnerability. Using whole spectrum measures to quantify inequality across multiple ordered social groups has important advantages. We illustrate these findings using an equity dashboard designed to support decision-making in the Sustainable Development Goals period.
(1)对全球疫苗免疫联盟(Gavi)支持国家儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的不平等情况进行系统分析;(2)比较评估不同的测量方法以及它们如何影响不平等程度的跨国比较。
利用45个Gavi支持国家的最新人口与健康调查(2005 - 2014年),我们在社会分层和健康不良后果易感性的七个维度上测量了疫苗接种覆盖率的不平等情况。我们使用成对比较(风险差异和比率)和全谱测量(斜率和不平等相对指数)来量化不平等。为了对比测量方法,我们使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总估计值,按不平等程度对国家进行排名,并比较国家排名的一致性。
总体而言,母亲教育程度、多维贫困和财富指数贫困是与最大不平等相关的维度。在45个国家中的36个国家,不平等现象严重,在这些社会维度中的至少一个维度上,最高和最低覆盖率之间的差异达10个百分点或更多。在较少数量的国家中也发现了按儿童性别、儿童营养不良和城乡居住地划分的重要不平等。不平等程度和国家排名因维度和所使用的测量方法而异。在某些国家无法进行成对比较。不平等的斜率和相对指数在所有国家都进行了估计,并产生了更稳定的国家排名,因此应有助于进行更可靠的国际比较。
在大多数Gavi支持的国家,疫苗接种覆盖率的不平等现象依然存在。应在多个易感性维度上监测不平等情况。使用全谱测量来量化多个有序社会群体之间的不平等具有重要优势。我们使用一个公平仪表盘来说明这些发现,该仪表盘旨在支持可持续发展目标时期的决策制定。