Suppr超能文献

视频胶囊内镜检查的保留率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Retention associated with video capsule endoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, King's College, London, England.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1157-1168.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has become a major diagnostic tool for small-bowel evaluation. However, retention of the video capsule endoscope remains a major concern.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of VCE retention rates by using Pubmed and SCOPUS (1995-2015). We included studies that enrolled at least 10 patients, included VCE retention rates, and separated retention rates by indication. We used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 3.0) to calculate pooled prevalence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed heterogeneity by using the Cochran Q statistic.

RESULTS

We included 25 studies (N = 5876) for patients undergoing VCE for evaluation of potential small-bowel bleeding, 9 studies (N = 968) for patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 11 studies (N = 558) for patients with established IBD, and 8 studies for patients (N = 111) undergoing VCE for evaluation of abdominal pain and/or diarrhea. We used a random effects model and found that the pooled retention rate was 2.1% for patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding (95% CI, 1.5%-2.8%). Retention rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.7%-8.6%) for suspected IBD, 8.2% (95% CI, 6.0%-11.0%) for established IBD, and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9%-5.0%) for abdominal pain and/or diarrhea. Based on subgroup analysis, subsequent VCE completion rates after performance of a patency capsule or CT enterography in patients with IBD to exclude retentions due to strictures was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.1%-6.4%). Reasons for retention were provided in 60 (77%) studies. The most common reasons for retention were small-bowel strictures, although etiology was not provided in all studies.

CONCLUSION

VCE retention occurs in approximately 2% of patients undergoing evaluation for small-bowel bleeding and is most likely due to small-bowel strictures. Retention rates in patients with suspected or known IBD were approximately 4% and 8%, based on our meta-analysis. These rates decreased by half in those studies that used either a patency capsule or CT enterography to assess patency before performing VCE.

摘要

背景与目的

视频胶囊内镜(VCE)已成为小肠评估的主要诊断工具。然而,胶囊内镜的滞留仍然是一个主要问题。

方法

我们使用 Pubmed 和 SCOPUS(1995-2015 年)进行了 VCE 滞留率的系统评价。我们纳入了至少纳入 10 例患者的研究,包括 VCE 滞留率,并按适应证对滞留率进行了区分。我们使用综合荟萃分析(版本 3.0)计算了 95%置信区间(CI)的合并患病率,并使用 Cochran Q 统计量评估了异质性。

结果

我们纳入了 25 项研究(N=5876 例),这些研究的患者接受 VCE 检查以评估潜在的小肠出血,9 项研究(N=968 例)患者怀疑患有炎症性肠病(IBD),11 项研究(N=558 例)患者确诊为 IBD,8 项研究(N=111 例)患者接受 VCE 检查以评估腹痛和/或腹泻。我们使用随机效应模型,发现疑似小肠出血患者的累积滞留率为 2.1%(95%CI,1.5%-2.8%)。疑似 IBD 患者的滞留率为 3.6%(95%CI,1.7%-8.6%),确诊 IBD 患者的滞留率为 8.2%(95%CI,6.0%-11.0%),腹痛和/或腹泻患者的滞留率为 2.2%(95%CI,0.9%-5.0%)。基于亚组分析,在 IBD 患者中进行通畅胶囊或 CT 肠造影术以排除因狭窄导致的滞留后,后续 VCE 完成率为 2.7%(95%CI,1.1%-6.4%)。60 项(77%)研究提供了滞留的原因。滞留最常见的原因是小肠狭窄,尽管并非所有研究都提供了病因。

结论

VCE 滞留发生在约 2%接受小肠出血评估的患者中,最可能是由于小肠狭窄。根据我们的荟萃分析,疑似或已知 IBD 患者的滞留率约为 4%和 8%。在那些使用通畅胶囊或 CT 肠造影术在进行 VCE 之前评估通畅性的研究中,这些比率降低了一半。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验