Bekelis Kimon, Missios Symeon, MacKenzie Todd A, Tjoumakaris Stavropoula, Jabbour Pascal
From the Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (K.B., S.T., P.J.); The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (K.B., T.A.M.); Neuroscience Institute, Cleveland Clinic/Akron General Hospital, OH (S.M.); and Department of Medicine (T.A.M.) and Department of Community and Family Medicine (T.A.M.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):361-366. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015343. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
The impact of anesthesia technique on the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke remains an issue of debate. We investigated the association of general anesthesia with outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke.
We performed a cohort study involving patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke from 2009 to 2013, who were registered in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. An instrumental variable (hospital rate of general anesthesia) analysis was used to simulate the effects of randomization and investigate the association of anesthesia technique with case-fatality and length of stay.
Among 1174 patients, 441 (37.6%) underwent general anesthesia and 733 (62.4%) underwent conscious sedation. Using an instrumental variable analysis, we identified that general anesthesia was associated with a 6.4% increased case-fatality (95% confidence interval, 1.9%-11.0%) and 8.4 days longer length of stay (95% confidence interval, 2.9-14.0) in comparison to conscious sedation. This corresponded to 15 patients needing to be treated with conscious sedation to prevent 1 death. Our results were robust in sensitivity analysis with mixed effects regression and propensity score-adjusted regression models.
Using a comprehensive all-payer cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy in New York State, we identified an association of general anesthesia with increased case-fatality and length of stay. These considerations should be taken into account when standardizing acute stroke care.
麻醉技术对急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓术预后的影响仍是一个存在争议的问题。我们研究了全身麻醉与缺血性脑卒中机械取栓术患者预后之间的关联。
我们进行了一项队列研究,纳入了2009年至2013年在纽约州全州规划与研究合作系统数据库中登记的接受缺血性脑卒中机械取栓术的患者。采用工具变量(全身麻醉的医院使用率)分析来模拟随机化的效果,并研究麻醉技术与病死率和住院时间的关联。
在1174例患者中,441例(37.6%)接受了全身麻醉,733例(62.4%)接受了清醒镇静。通过工具变量分析,我们发现与清醒镇静相比,全身麻醉与病死率增加6.4%(95%置信区间,1.9%-11.0%)和住院时间延长8.4天(95%置信区间,2.9-14.0)相关。这相当于需要15例患者接受清醒镇静治疗以预防1例死亡。我们的结果在混合效应回归和倾向评分调整回归模型的敏感性分析中是稳健的。
通过对纽约州接受机械取栓术的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的综合全付费者队列研究,我们发现全身麻醉与病死率增加和住院时间延长有关。在规范急性脑卒中治疗时应考虑这些因素。