• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户参与心理健康服务:综合护理中一项创新举措的项目逻辑模型

Users' involvement in mental health services: programme logic model of an innovative initiative in integrated care.

作者信息

Tremblay Carolane, Coulombe Valérie, Briand Catherine

机构信息

Centre for Studies on Rehabilitation, Recovery and Social Inclusion, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada ; Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada.

Canadian Mental Health Association-Montreal Branch, Montréal, QC Canada.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jan 5;11:9. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0111-5. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-016-0111-5
PMID:28070219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5217607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collaboration and partnership are key issues for modern health systems seeking to implement quality integrated care that meets the needs of the population. The -- (Connecting Community organisations-Institutions-Users, CCIU), involving community- and institution-based mental health workers, carers and users, is an innovative normative integrated care group (group for shared values, culture and vision) established by the Canadian Mental Health Association-Montreal Branch. A programme evaluation approach was used to conduct a logic analysis of the CCIU in order to understand the relationships between its resources, activities and outcomes, build a common understanding and, allow for its replication.

METHODS

Five steps were involved in the creation of a programme logic model. A non-exhaustive literature search for similar initiatives, a review of documents related to the CCIU process and direct observations led to the development of a first model. Then, following a participatory and reflexive process, this model was validated with CCIU participants.

RESULTS

A comprehensive model and a simplified model were created. Participants' experiential knowledge and scientific knowledge helped to identify the essential components of the successful operation of the CCIU.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCIU, with its eight essential components, including relations based on equality and mutual respect, corresponds to an essential step in normative integration and integrated care that lead to improved quality services.

摘要

背景

对于寻求实施满足民众需求的优质综合护理的现代卫生系统而言,合作与伙伴关系是关键问题。由加拿大心理健康协会蒙特利尔分会设立的“连接社区组织-机构-用户”(CCIU),吸纳了社区和机构层面的心理健康工作者、护理人员及用户,是一个创新型规范综合护理团体(基于共享价值观、文化和愿景的团体)。采用项目评估方法对CCIU进行逻辑分析,以了解其资源、活动与成果之间的关系,达成共识并实现可复制性。

方法

创建项目逻辑模型涉及五个步骤。对类似举措进行非详尽的文献检索、审查与CCIU流程相关的文件并进行直接观察,从而形成了首个模型。随后,经过参与式和反思性过程,该模型由CCIU参与者进行了验证。

结果

创建了一个全面模型和一个简化模型。参与者的经验知识和科学知识有助于确定CCIU成功运作的关键要素。

结论

CCIU及其八个关键要素,包括基于平等和相互尊重的关系,是规范整合和综合护理的重要一步,可带来服务质量的提升。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/0e085fa1c8f9/13033_2016_111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/3411f86ec810/13033_2016_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/c9a3bdcc638e/13033_2016_111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/0e085fa1c8f9/13033_2016_111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/3411f86ec810/13033_2016_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/c9a3bdcc638e/13033_2016_111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52e9/5217607/0e085fa1c8f9/13033_2016_111_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Users' involvement in mental health services: programme logic model of an innovative initiative in integrated care.用户参与心理健康服务:综合护理中一项创新举措的项目逻辑模型
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jan 5;11:9. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0111-5. eCollection 2017.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
4
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
6
7
[Issues, dilemmas and managerial strategies of potential ethical risks associated with the implementation of patient partnership practices in psychiatry: a case study].[精神病学中实施患者伙伴关系实践相关潜在伦理风险的问题、困境及管理策略:一项案例研究]
Sante Ment Que. 2015 Spring;40(1):119-34.
8
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
Understanding what affects psychological morbidity in informal carers when providing care at home for patients at the end of life: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.了解在家中为临终患者提供护理时,哪些因素会影响非正式护理人员的心理发病率:一项系统的定性证据综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;13(8):1-53. doi: 10.3310/PYTR4127.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the Implementation of a Model of Care Improve the Value for Money of Mental Health Services in Prisons?实施一种护理模式能否提高监狱心理健康服务的性价比?
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2025 Aug;35(4):228-239. doi: 10.1002/cbm.70005. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Strategic Implementation Planning for Integrated Behavioral Health Services in Pediatric Primary Care.儿科初级保健中综合行为健康服务的战略实施规划
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jan 1;2. doi: 10.1177/2633489520987558. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Communities, health-care organizations and the contingencies and contradictions of engagement: A case study from Chile.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters.理解患有多种慢性病患者的健康背景:从关注问题本身到关注重要事项。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):260-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1643.
2
Integrated models of care for medical inpatients with psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.合并精神障碍的内科住院患者的综合护理模式:一项系统综述
Psychosomatics. 2014 Jul-Aug;55(4):315-325. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2013.08.003. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
3
A governance model for integrated primary/secondary care for the health-reforming first world - results of a systematic review.
社区、医疗保健组织以及参与的偶然性和矛盾性:来自智利的案例研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):229-237. doi: 10.1111/hex.12996. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
The experience of mental health service users in health system strengthening: lessons from Uganda.心理健康服务使用者在卫生系统强化中的经历:来自乌干达的经验教训。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Sep 6;13:60. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0316-5. eCollection 2019.
为改革后的第一世界提供一体化初级/中级医疗保健的治理模式——系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 20;13:528. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-528.
4
Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care.理解整合照护:基于初级保健综合功能的全面概念框架。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
5
International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.国际上对恢复的理解存在差异:系统综述。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):353-64. doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000133. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Recovery in Canada: toward social equality.加拿大的复苏:走向社会平等。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):19-28. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.655712.
7
Recovery in Austria: mental health trialogue.奥地利的复苏:心理健康三方对话。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):11-8. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.655713.
8
Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers.全球改善心理健康的伙伴关系:世界心理卫生联合会关于与服务使用者和家属合作的最佳实践建议。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;10(3):229-36. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00062.x.
9
Trialog-an exercise in communication between consumers, carers and professional mental health workers beyond role stereotypes.三方对话——超越角色刻板印象的消费者、护理人员和专业心理健康工作者之间的沟通实践。
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Jan 29;10 Suppl(Suppl):e014. doi: 10.5334/ijic.484.
10
Understanding and influencing the stigma of mental illness.理解并影响对精神疾病的污名化现象。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008 Jan;46(1):42-8. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20080101-04.