• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Approval status and evidence for WHO essential medicines for children in the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan: a cross-sectional study.美国、英国和日本世界卫生组织儿童基本药物的批准状况与证据:一项横断面研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jan 6;10:4. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0094-2. eCollection 2017.
2
Essential medicines for children in Armenia.亚美尼亚儿童基本药物。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S43-4. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150682.
3
Evaluation of marketing authorization and labels of medicines in 2021 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children in China, the Russian Federation and Brazil.评估 2021 年世界卫生组织儿童基本药物示范清单中中国、俄罗斯联邦和巴西的药品上市许可和标签。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Mar 5;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01117-7.
4
Childhood cancer drugs in China: An overview and comparison of regulatory approvals in China and the United States.中国儿童癌症药物:中美监管批准的概述与比较。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Feb 1;150(3):482-490. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33818. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Assessing the Appropriateness of Formulations on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children: Development of a Paediatric Quality Target Product Profile Tool.评估世界卫生组织儿童基本药物示范清单上制剂的适宜性:儿科质量目标产品简介工具的开发
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 22;14(3):473. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030473.
6
Indian Essential Medicine List for Children: Time to Revisit.《印度儿童基本药物清单:是时候重新审视了》
Cureus. 2023 Feb 22;15(2):e35340. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35340. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Public health relevance of medicines developed under paediatric legislation in Europe and the USA: a systematic mapping study.欧洲和美国根据儿科立法开发的药物的公共卫生相关性:系统映射研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Apr 2;8(1):e002455. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002455.
8
Are age-appropriate antibiotic formulations missing from the WHO list of essential medicines for children? A comparison study.世界卫生组织儿童基本药物清单中是否缺少适合儿童年龄的抗生素制剂?一项比较研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Apr;102(4):352-356. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311933. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
9
Defining Essential Childhood Cancer Medicines to Inform Prioritization and Access: Results From an International, Cross-Sectional Survey.定义基本儿童癌症药物,以明确优先顺序和获得途径:一项国际横断面调查的结果。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Jun;8:e2200034. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00034.
10
Essential medicines lists for children of WHO, India, South Africa, and EML of China: A comparative study.世界卫生组织、印度、南非和中国基本药物清单:比较研究。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Nov;10(4):271-280. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12240. Epub 2017 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of marketing authorization and labels of medicines in 2021 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children in China, the Russian Federation and Brazil.评估 2021 年世界卫生组织儿童基本药物示范清单中中国、俄罗斯联邦和巴西的药品上市许可和标签。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Mar 5;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01117-7.
2
Evaluation of Propofol in Comparison with Other General Anesthetics for Surgery in Children Younger than 3 Years: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评价丙泊酚与其他全身麻醉剂用于 3 岁以下儿童手术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 22;34(15):e124. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e124.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantitative Extrapolation: An Approach to Validation of Adult Drug Efficacy in Pediatric Subjects.定量外推法:一种验证儿科患者中成人药物疗效的方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 Sep;47(5):557-565. doi: 10.1177/2168479013500286.
2
A Modeling and Simulations Framework to Support Global Regulatory Strategies for Pediatric Drug Development Programs.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 Sep;47(5):550-556. doi: 10.1177/2168479013500289.
3
Drug Development for Pediatric Populations: Regulatory Aspects.儿科人群的药物研发:监管方面
Pharmaceutics. 2010 Nov 29;2(4):364-388. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics2040364.
4
'Better medicines for children' within the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness framework: a qualitative inquiry in Uganda.《儿童疾病综合管理》框架下的“儿童适用药物”:乌干达的一项定性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Jun 7;9:22. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0071-9. eCollection 2016.
5
Availability and affordability of essential medicines for children in the Western part of Ethiopia: implication for access.埃塞俄比亚西部儿童基本药物的可及性与可负担性:对获取情况的影响
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Mar 15;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0572-3.
6
Explaining the slow transition of child-appropriate dosage formulations from the global to national level in the context of Uganda: a qualitative study.在乌干达背景下解释适合儿童剂量配方从全球层面到国家层面的缓慢转变:一项定性研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015 Jul 15;8(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40545-015-0039-1. eCollection 2015.
7
WHO includes 16 new cancer drugs on list of essential medicines.
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jul;16(7):757. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70240-8. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Essential medicines for children.儿童基本药物
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Feb;100 Suppl 1:S38-42. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305705.
9
Access to paediatric essential medicines: a survey of prices, availability, affordability and price components in Shaanxi Province, China.陕西省儿童基本药物的可及性:价格、供应情况、可负担性及价格构成调查
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090365. eCollection 2014.
10
Assessment of factors associated with dose differences between Japan and the United States.评估与日本和美国之间剂量差异相关的因素。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):542-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.231. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

美国、英国和日本世界卫生组织儿童基本药物的批准状况与证据:一项横断面研究。

Approval status and evidence for WHO essential medicines for children in the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Shimazawa Rumiko, Ikeda Masayuki

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193 Japan.

Department of Medical Informatics, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki-cho Ikenobe, Kagawa 761-0793 Japan.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jan 6;10:4. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0094-2. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40545-016-0094-2
PMID:28070339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5217454/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children (EMLc) covers medicines for globally high-burden diseases. Regulatory approval in high-income countries ensures evidence and dosage form but usually focuses on diseases common in those countries and not in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed supporting evidence for the 346 medicines in the 5th WHO EMLc and their approval data from the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan.

RESULTS

Of the 346 EMLc medicines, 307 were approved in one or more of the three countries, 278 of which had supporting evidence of efficacy. The percentage of medicines approved in one or more of the three countries was lowest for antiparasitics (60%) whereas 100% for medicines for cancers and musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions were approved. Five of the 30 EMLc antineoplastics had no supporting paediatric evidence. Of the 39 EMLc medicines unapproved in all three countries, 26 were indicated for neglected infectious diseases (NIDs). Ten of the 26 had supporting paediatric evidence. Seventeen of the 39 unapproved medicines had no paediatric dosage form available, and all 17 were indicated for NIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Most EMLc medicines for diseases common in the three countries had supporting evidence, which was closely associated with approval, whereas a substantial number of medicines for NIDs were unapproved in the three countries, regardless of whether they had supporting evidence. Because of the limited contribution to the EMLc from high income countries, appropriate incentive mechanisms for pharmaceutical companies are required to make paediatric development for NIDs feasible and effective.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织儿童基本药物示范清单(EMLc)涵盖了全球高负担疾病的药物。高收入国家的监管批准确保了证据和剂型,但通常侧重于这些国家常见的疾病,而非低收入和中等收入国家常见的疾病。

方法

这项横断面研究评估了世界卫生组织第5版EMLc中346种药物的支持证据及其来自美国、英国和日本的批准数据。

结果

在346种EMLc药物中,307种在这三个国家中的一个或多个国家获得批准,其中278种有疗效支持证据。在这三个国家中的一个或多个国家获得批准的药物百分比,抗寄生虫药物最低(60%),而癌症、肌肉骨骼和呼吸系统疾病的药物获批率为100%。30种EMLc抗肿瘤药物中有5种没有儿科支持证据。在所有三个国家均未获批的39种EMLc药物中,26种用于被忽视的传染病(NIDs)。26种中有10种有儿科支持证据。39种未获批药物中有17种没有儿科剂型,且所有17种均用于NIDs。

结论

大多数用于这三个国家常见疾病的EMLc药物有支持证据,这与获批密切相关,而大量用于NIDs的药物在这三个国家未获批,无论它们是否有支持证据。由于高收入国家对EMLc的贡献有限,需要为制药公司建立适当的激励机制,以使针对NIDs的儿科药物研发可行且有效。