Maia-Lima André, Ramos Guilherme Passos, Moraes Michele Macedo, Pacheco Diogo Antônio Soares, de Oliveira Gustavo Guimarães Aguiar, de Barros Cristiano Lino Monteiro, Prado Luciano Sales, Garcia Emerson Silami
Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;38(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113465. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
This study examined the effects of precooling on performance and pacing during 30-km cycling exercise in hot and temperate environments. 8 trained male cyclists performed 4 trials involving either cooling (PREC and PREC) or no-cooling interventions (TEMP and HOT) prior to a 30-km self-paced cycling exercise in either a hot (35°C, 68% relative humidity) or temperate environment (24°C, 68% relative humidity). Exercise time was longer in HOT (60.62±3.47 min) than in TEMP (58.28±3.30 min; <0.001), and precooling attenuated this thermal strain performance impairment (PREC 58.28±3.30 min; =0.048), but it was still impaired compared with TEMP (=0.02). Exercise performance in PREC (54.58±4.35 min) was no different from TEMP. Initial power output was sustained until the end of the exercise in both TEMP and PREC, but was reduced from the 12 km until the end of the trial in HOT (P<0.05). This reduction was delayed by precooling because power output was reduced only after the 20 km during PREC (P<0.05). Heart rate was similar in all conditions throughout almost the entire exercise, suggesting the maintenance of similar relative intensities. In conclusion, precooling was effective in attenuating, but not completely reversing thermal strain performance impairment and offered no ergogenic effect in the temperate environment.
本研究考察了在炎热和温和环境下进行30公里自行车运动时预冷对运动表现和配速的影响。8名训练有素的男性自行车运动员在30公里自定节奏的自行车运动前,分别在炎热(35°C,相对湿度68%)或温和环境(24°C,相对湿度68%)下进行了4次试验,试验包括冷却干预(PREC和PREC)或无冷却干预(TEMP和HOT)。HOT组的运动时间(60.62±3.47分钟)比TEMP组(58.28±3.30分钟;P<0.001)长,预冷减轻了这种热应激对运动表现的损害(PREC组58.28±3.30分钟;P=0.048),但与TEMP组相比仍有损害(P=0.02)。PREC组的运动表现(54.58±4.35分钟)与TEMP组无差异。TEMP组和PREC组在运动结束前都能维持初始功率输出,但HOT组从12公里开始到试验结束功率输出降低(P<0.05)。预冷延迟了这种降低,因为PREC组仅在20公里后功率输出才降低(P<0.05)。在几乎整个运动过程中,所有条件下的心率都相似,表明相对强度保持相似。总之,预冷在减轻热应激对运动表现的损害方面有效,但不能完全逆转,并且在温和环境中没有产生促力效应。