Shang Felipe Lioe Teh, Wanner Samuel Penna, Damasceno William Coutinho, Martins Ygor Antônio Tinoco, Silva Andressa, Prado Luciano Sales
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Psychobiology and Exercise Studies Centre, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Temperature (Austin). 2020 Oct 30;8(2):188-201. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1829939. eCollection 2021.
Evidence indicates that aerobic performance is degraded either by environmental heat stress or sleep deprivation. However, whether these conditions interact to produce more significant performance impairment deserves further investigation. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of experimental sleep deprivation (24 h or 96 h) on aerobic performance and thermoregulatory responses in rats exercised on a treadmill at different environmental conditions. Adult male Wistar rats were subjected to rapid eye movement sleep deprivation (RSD) using the modified multiple platform method and were then subjected to an incremental-speed exercise until they were fatigued. Treadmill running was performed in a temperate (24°C) or warm (31°C) environment, and the colonic temperature (an index of core body temperature; T) and the tail-skin temperature (T; an index of cutaneous heat loss) were recorded. 24-h and 96-h RSD produced small magnitude reductions in aerobic performance (Cohen's d = 0.47-0.58) and minor changes in thermoregulation. Relative to control rats, sleep-deprived rats showed a higher T at the exercise initiation and a higher threshold for activating cutaneous heat loss, but unchanged T and T at fatigue. Exercise at 31°C induced large reductions in performance (d = 0.82-1.29) and marked changes in thermoregulation, as evidenced by higher T and T at fatigue, compared to exercise at 24°C. Interestingly, none of the effects induced by RSD were exacerbated by environmental heat stress and vice-versa, indicating that both conditions did not interact. We conclude that RSD and heat stress modulate aerobic performance and thermoregulatory responses by acting independently.
有证据表明,有氧运动能力会因环境热应激或睡眠剥夺而下降。然而,这些情况是否相互作用导致更显著的运动能力损害,值得进一步研究。因此,本研究调查了实验性睡眠剥夺(24小时或96小时)对在不同环境条件下于跑步机上运动的大鼠的有氧运动能力和体温调节反应的影响。成年雄性Wistar大鼠采用改良多平台法进行快速眼动睡眠剥夺(RSD),然后进行递增速度运动直至疲劳。在温和(24°C)或温暖(31°C)环境中进行跑步机跑步,并记录结肠温度(核心体温指标;T)和尾皮温度(T;皮肤散热指标)。24小时和96小时的RSD导致有氧运动能力有小幅下降(科恩d值=0.47 - 0.58),体温调节有轻微变化。与对照大鼠相比,睡眠剥夺大鼠在运动开始时T较高,激活皮肤散热的阈值较高,但在疲劳时T和T不变。与在24°C运动相比,在31°C运动导致运动能力大幅下降(d = 0.82 - 1.29),体温调节有明显变化,疲劳时T和T较高证明了这一点。有趣的是,RSD诱导的任何效应都没有因环境热应激而加剧,反之亦然,这表明这两种情况没有相互作用。我们得出结论,RSD和热应激通过独立作用来调节有氧运动能力和体温调节反应。