Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Harmful Algae. 2016 May;55:97-111. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Many degraded waterbodies around the world are subject to strong proliferations of cyanobacteria - notorious for their toxicity, high biomass build-up and negative impacts on aquatic food webs - the presence of which puts serious limits on the human use of affected water bodies. Cyanobacterial blooms are largely regarded as trophic dead ends since they are a relatively poor food source for zooplankton. As a consequence, their population dynamics are generally attributed to changes in abiotic conditions (bottom-up control). Blooms however generally contain a vast and diverse community of micro-organisms of which some have shown devastating effects on cyanobacterial biomass. For Microcystis, one of the most common bloom-forming cyanobacteria worldwide, a high number of micro-organisms (about 120 taxa) including viruses, bacteria, microfungi, different groups of heterotrophic protists, other cyanobacteria and several eukaryotic microalgal groups are currently known to negatively affect its growth by infection and predation or by the production of allelopathic compounds. Although many of these specifically target Microcystis, sharp declines of Microcystis biomass in nature are only rarely assigned to these antagonistic microbiota. The commonly found strain specificity of their interactions may largely preclude strong antagonistic effects on Microcystis population levels but may however induce compositional shifts that can change ecological properties such as bloom toxicity. These highly specific interactions may form the basis of a continuous arms race (co-evolution) between Microcystis and its antagonists which potentially limits the possibilities for (micro)biological bloom control.
世界上许多退化的水体都受到蓝藻的强烈繁殖的影响——这些蓝藻以其毒性、高生物量积累和对水生食物网的负面影响而臭名昭著,其存在严重限制了受影响水体的人类使用。蓝藻水华在很大程度上被认为是营养性的死胡同,因为它们对浮游动物来说是一种相对较差的食物来源。因此,它们的种群动态通常归因于非生物条件的变化(底栖控制)。然而,水华通常含有大量多样的微生物群落,其中一些微生物对蓝藻生物量具有破坏性影响。对于微囊藻,这是世界上最常见的形成水华的蓝藻之一,目前已知许多微生物(约 120 个分类群),包括病毒、细菌、微真菌、不同类群的异养原生动物、其他蓝藻和几个真核微藻群,通过感染和捕食或产生化感化合物来负面对其生长产生影响。尽管其中许多微生物专门针对微囊藻,但在自然界中,微囊藻生物量的急剧下降很少归因于这些拮抗微生物群。它们相互作用的常见菌株特异性可能在很大程度上排除了对微囊藻种群水平的强烈拮抗作用,但可能会诱导组成性变化,从而改变生态特性,如水华毒性。这些高度特异性的相互作用可能是微囊藻与其拮抗剂之间持续军备竞赛(共同进化)的基础,这可能限制了(微生物)生物水华控制的可能性。