Franklin Daniel J
Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 22;12:633954. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633954. eCollection 2021.
Cyanobacteria are ancient and versatile members of almost all aquatic food webs. In freshwater ecosystems some cyanobacteria form "bloom" populations containing potent toxins and such blooms are therefore a key focus of study. Bloom populations can be ephemeral, with rapid population declines possible, though the factors causing such declines are generally poorly understood. Cell death could be a significant factor linked to population decline. Broadly, three forms of cell death are currently recognized - accidental, regulated and programmed - and efforts are underway to identify these and standardize the use of cell death terminology, guided by work on better-studied cells. For cyanobacteria, the study of such differing forms of cell death has received little attention, and classifying cell death across the group, and within complex natural populations, is therefore hard and experimentally difficult. The population dynamics of photosynthetic microbes have, in the past, been principally explained through reference to abiotic ("bottom-up") factors. However, it has become clearer that in general, only a partial linkage exists between abiotic conditions and cyanobacteria population fluctuations in many situations. Instead, a range of biotic interactions both within and between cyanobacteria, and their competitors, pathogens and consumers, can be seen as the major drivers of the observed population fluctuations. Whilst some evolutionary processes may theoretically account for the existence of an intrinsic form of cell death in cyanobacteria, a range of biotic interactions are also likely to frequently cause the ecological incidence of cell death. New theoretical models and single-cell techniques are being developed to illuminate this area. The importance of such work is underlined by both (a) predictions of increasing cyanobacteria dominance due to anthropogenic factors and (b) the realization that influential ecosystem modeling work includes mortality terms with scant foundation, even though such terms can have a very large impact on model predictions. These ideas are explored and a prioritization of research needs is proposed.
蓝藻是几乎所有水生食物网中古老且多样的成员。在淡水生态系统中,一些蓝藻会形成含有强效毒素的“水华”种群,因此这类水华是研究的重点。水华种群可能是短暂的,种群数量可能会迅速下降,不过导致这种下降的因素通常还不太清楚。细胞死亡可能是与种群数量下降相关的一个重要因素。一般来说,目前已识别出三种细胞死亡形式——意外死亡、调节性死亡和程序性死亡——并且正在努力识别这些形式并规范细胞死亡术语的使用,这一工作以对研究更充分的细胞的研究为指导。对于蓝藻而言,对这类不同形式细胞死亡的研究很少受到关注,因此在整个蓝藻群体以及复杂的自然种群中对细胞死亡进行分类既困难又在实验上具有挑战性。过去,光合微生物的种群动态主要通过参考非生物(“自下而上”)因素来解释。然而,现在越来越清楚的是,在许多情况下,非生物条件与蓝藻种群波动之间通常只存在部分联系。相反,蓝藻内部以及蓝藻与其竞争者、病原体和消费者之间的一系列生物相互作用,可以被视为观察到的种群波动的主要驱动因素。虽然从理论上讲,一些进化过程可能解释了蓝藻中存在一种内在形式的细胞死亡,但一系列生物相互作用也可能经常导致细胞死亡的生态发生。正在开发新的理论模型和单细胞技术来阐明这一领域。(a)由于人为因素导致蓝藻优势增加的预测,以及(b)认识到有影响力的生态系统建模工作中包含的死亡率术语缺乏依据,尽管这些术语可能对模型预测有非常大的影响,都凸显了此类工作的重要性。本文探讨了这些观点,并提出了研究需求的优先排序。