• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估使用桥接技术的腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的预测因素。

Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, CH wapi, 9 Avenue Delmée, 7500, Tournai, Belgium.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3656-3663. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0
PMID:28078462
Abstract

AIM

To assess the long-term incidence and predictive factors for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 213 consecutive patients operated by laparoscopy for primary ventral (n = 158) or incisional hernia (n = 55) between 2001 and 2014. Patients had a repair without fascia closure by intra-peritoneal onlay placement of a Parietex composite mesh centred on the defect with an overlap of at least 3 cm. Clinical outcome was assessed by a combination of office consultation, patient's electronic medical file review and telephone interview.

RESULTS

There were 144 men and 69 women with a mean age of 55 ± 12 years and a BMI of 32 ± 6. With a mean follow-up of 69 ± 44 months, a recurrent hernia was noted in 16 patients (7.5%). Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant higher recurrence rate in the following conditions: incisional hernia (15%), BMI ≥ 35 (21%), defect width >4 cm (27%), defect area >20 cm (27%), mesh overlap <5 cm (32%) and ratio of mesh area to defect area (M/D ratio) ≤12 (48%). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that M/D ratio was the only independent predictive factor for recurrence (coefficient -0.79, OR 0.46, p < 0.002). With a M/D ratio ≤8, between 9 and 12, between 13 and 16, and ≥17, the recurrence rate was, respectively, 70, 35, 9 and 0% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia using a bridging technique, an overlap of at least 5 cm is not all that is required to prevent hernia recurrence. The M/D ratio is the most important predictive factor for recurrence. A ratio of 13 appears as the threshold under which that technique cannot be recommended and 16 as the threshold over which the risk of recurrence is virtually nil. If a satisfactory M/D ratio cannot be achieved, other surgical repair should be proposed to the patient.

摘要

目的

评估使用桥接技术行腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术后的长期复发率及其预测因素。

方法

研究组纳入了 2001 年至 2014 年间因原发性腹壁(n=158)或切口疝(n=55)行腹腔镜手术的 213 例连续患者。所有患者均接受了一种无筋膜关闭的修补术,即通过腹腔内置入 Parietex 复合网片,将其置于缺损中心,重叠至少 3cm。通过联合门诊就诊、患者电子病历回顾和电话访谈评估临床结果。

结果

患者中有 144 名男性和 69 名女性,平均年龄为 55±12 岁,BMI 为 32±6。平均随访 69±44 个月后,16 例(7.5%)患者出现复发性疝。单因素分析显示,以下情况下的复发率有统计学显著升高:切口疝(15%)、BMI≥35(21%)、缺损宽度>4cm(27%)、缺损面积>20cm(27%)、网片重叠<5cm(32%)和网片面积与缺损面积比(M/D 比)≤12(48%)。多因素逻辑分析显示,M/D 比是唯一的独立复发预测因素(系数-0.79,OR 0.46,p<0.002)。当 M/D 比≤8、9-12、13-16 和≥17 时,复发率分别为 70%、35%、9%和 0%(p<0.001)。

结论

在使用桥接技术行腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术中,至少 5cm 的重叠并不足以预防疝复发。M/D 比是复发的最重要预测因素。13 似乎是该技术不能推荐的阈值,16 是复发风险几乎为零的阈值。如果无法达到满意的 M/D 比,则应向患者提出其他手术修复方案。

相似文献

1
Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique.评估使用桥接技术的腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3656-3663. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.合适的补片重叠是腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术后疝复发的关键决定因素。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
4
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Laparoscopic Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair.腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术
JSLS. 2020 Jan-Mar;24(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00007.
7
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
Massive Incisional Hernia Repair with Parietex: Monocentric Analysis on 500 Cases Treated with a Laparoscopic Approach.使用 Parietex 进行巨大切口疝修补术:腹腔镜手术治疗 500 例的单中心分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):388-392. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0623. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Unidirectional barbed sutures as a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.单向倒刺缝线作为腹腔镜腹疝修补的新技术。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4275-x. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Abandoning mesh "overlap" in favor of "width" and its importance in open retromuscular midline incisional hernia repair: a nationwide database study.放弃网片“重叠”而采用“宽度”及其在开放的肌后中线切口疝修补术中的重要性:一项全国性数据库研究
Hernia. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):237. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03423-7.
2
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive model for recurrence of incisional hernia constructed by CT abdominal wall imaging features.

本文引用的文献

1
Defects and donuts: the importance of the mesh:defect area ratio.缺损与“甜甜圈”:网片与缺损面积比的重要性。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):893-895. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1524-4. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
2
Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.合适的补片重叠是腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术后疝复发的关键决定因素。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
3
Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia.
基于腹部CT壁层成像特征构建的切口疝复发预测模型。
BMC Surg. 2025 May 24;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02838-4.
4
Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入术后粘连——问题有多严重?
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 26;4:14126. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14126. eCollection 2025.
5
Robotic trans-abdominal retromuscular hernia repair for medium-sized midline hernias: midterm outcomes and surgical site occurrence (SSO) analysis in 120 patients.机器人经腹肌后疝修补术治疗中型中线疝:120例患者的中期结果及手术部位发生情况(SSO)分析
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 16;19(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02184-2.
6
Application of bridging mesh repair in giant ventral incisional hernia.桥接补片在巨大腹壁切口疝中的应用。
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2411-2420. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01825-3. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
7
An improved approach of totally visceral sac separation (TVS) for incisional hernia compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus repair (IPOM plus).与腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM plus)相比,一种改良的完全内脏囊分离(TVS)切口疝治疗方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 21;13(1):18037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45192-2.
8
STRONGHOLD first-year results of biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair: a propensity score matching.STRONGHOLD 研究中生物力学计算的腹壁修复的 1 年结果:倾向评分匹配。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02897-7. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
9
Obesity increases the surgical complexity and risk of recurrence after midline primary ventral hernia repair: results on 2307 patients from the French Society of hernia surgery (SFCP-CH) registry database.肥胖增加了中线原发性腹疝修补术后的手术复杂性和复发风险:来自法国疝外科学会(SFCP-CH)注册数据库的 2307 例患者的结果。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):779-788. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02875-z. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
Mesh overlap for ventral hernia repair in current practice.网片重叠在腹疝修补术中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9476-9482. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10348-8. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗择期切口疝的Meta分析和系统评价
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1351-z. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, can it be done by phone? A prospective study in 300 patients, the PINQ-PHONE.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的随访可以通过电话进行吗?一项针对300例患者的前瞻性研究,即PINQ-PHONE研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3292-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4080-6. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Biomechanical abdominal wall model applied to hernia repair.应用于疝修补的生物力学腹壁模型。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(2):e133-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9687.
6
A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.手术治疗大型切口疝的系统评价。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1321-x. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗切口疝和腹疝的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z.
8
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: long term results.
J Visc Surg. 2014 Apr;151(2):103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术:是否存在最佳的补片固定技术?一项系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1126-x.
10
Laparoscopic repair of primary ventral hernias: a series of 118 consecutive patients.原发性腹疝的腹腔镜修补术:118例连续病例系列研究
Acta Chir Belg. 2013 Mar-Apr;113(2):96-102.