• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China.

Department of Prosthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40721. doi: 10.1038/srep40721.

DOI:10.1038/srep40721
PMID:28079176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5228345/
Abstract

Femoral nerve blocks (FNB) can provide effective pain relief but result in quadriceps weakness with increased risk of falls following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Adductor canal block (ACB) is a relatively new alternative providing pure sensory blockade with minimal effect on quadriceps strength. The meta-analysis was designed to evaluate whether ACB exhibited better outcomes with respect to quadriceps strength, pain control, ambulation ability, and complications. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) and the Cochrane Database were searched for RCTs comparing ACB with FNB after TKAs. Of 309 citations identified by our search strategy, 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Compared to FNB, quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was significantly higher for ACB, which was consistent with the results regarding quadriceps strength assessed with manual muscle strength scale. Moreover, ACB had significantly higher risk of falling versus FNB. At any follow-up time, ACB was not inferior to FNB regarding pain control or opioid consumption, and showed better range of motion in comparison with FNB. ACB is superior to the FNB regarding sparing of quadriceps strength and faster knee function recovery. It provides pain relief and opioid consumption comparable to FNB and is associated with decreased risk of falls.

摘要

股神经阻滞(FNB)可以提供有效的止痛效果,但在全膝关节置换术后(TKA)会导致股四头肌无力,增加跌倒的风险。收肌管阻滞(ACB)是一种相对较新的替代方法,可提供纯感觉阻滞,对股四头肌力量的影响最小。该荟萃分析旨在评估 ACB 在股四头肌力量、疼痛控制、步行能力和并发症方面是否具有更好的效果。通过对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、万方、中国知网(CNKI)和 Cochrane 数据库进行检索,比较了 TKA 后 ACB 与 FNB 的 RCT。通过我们的搜索策略,共确定了 309 条引文,其中 12 项 RCT 符合纳入标准。与 FNB 相比,ACB 的股四头肌最大等长收缩(MVIC)明显更高,与手动肌肉力量评估的股四头肌力量结果一致。此外,ACB 与 FNB 相比,跌倒的风险明显更高。在任何随访时间,ACB 在疼痛控制或阿片类药物消耗方面并不逊于 FNB,与 FNB 相比,其活动范围更好。与 FNB 相比,ACB 具有更好的股四头肌力量保留和更快的膝关节功能恢复效果。它提供了与 FNB 相当的疼痛缓解和阿片类药物消耗,并且与跌倒风险降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/4998789568ee/srep40721-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/8686a3a94a60/srep40721-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/69827a8876aa/srep40721-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/01d9524ba50f/srep40721-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/92150b232a7d/srep40721-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/c72fb6c2c985/srep40721-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/5cc600a3f420/srep40721-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/4998789568ee/srep40721-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/8686a3a94a60/srep40721-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/69827a8876aa/srep40721-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/01d9524ba50f/srep40721-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/92150b232a7d/srep40721-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/c72fb6c2c985/srep40721-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/5cc600a3f420/srep40721-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/4998789568ee/srep40721-f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40721. doi: 10.1038/srep40721.
2
Is Adductor Canal Block Better Than Femoral Nerve Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A GRADE Analysis of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在初次全膝关节置换术中,收肌管阻滞比股神经阻滞更好吗?通过系统评价和荟萃分析对证据进行的GRADE分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3238-3248.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Analgesic efficacy and quadriceps strength of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的镇痛效果及股四头肌力量比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2614-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3874-3. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
4
Effects of multi-site infiltration analgesia on pain management and early rehabilitation compared with femoral nerve or adductor canal block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全膝关节置换术患者多部位浸润镇痛与股神经或收肌管阻滞相比对疼痛管理和早期康复的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3278-0. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
The comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):745-54. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2194-1. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
6
Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与股神经阻滞相比,收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后效果更佳:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2998-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
7
Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study.股神经阻滞与收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后股四头肌肌力、活动度和疼痛的影响:一项随机、盲法研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
8
Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):540-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000119.
9
[Comparision for clinical efficiency of continuous adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换术中连续收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的临床疗效比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):142-7.
10
The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.全膝关节置换术后使用股神经阻滞与内收肌管阻滞的跌倒风险:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Functional Outcomes and Pain Intensity Variations After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis of Pain Block Techniques.全膝关节置换术后功能结局与疼痛强度变化的评估:疼痛阻滞技术的比较分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 May 13;9(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00323. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
Comparing the analgesic effects of femoral triangle block and adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后股三角阻滞与收肌管阻滞镇痛效果的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03073-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic association between NFKB1 -94 ins/del ATTG Promoter Polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 42 case-control studies.NFKB1基因-94位点插入/缺失ATTG启动子多态性与癌症风险的遗传关联:42项病例对照研究的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 22;6:30220. doi: 10.1038/srep30220.
2
Closed Suction Drainage Is Not Associated with Faster Recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of 80 Patients.闭合引流与全膝关节置换术后更快的康复无关:一项前瞻性随机对照研究 80 例患者。
Orthop Surg. 2016 May;8(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/os.12247.
3
Adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
Adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review of the literature.
全膝关节置换术中的收肌管阻滞:文献综述
BJA Open. 2025 Mar 18;14:100381. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100381. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Analgesia Nociception Index Monitoring in Management of Perioperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeries with Femoral Nerve Block.股神经阻滞在全膝关节置换手术围手术期镇痛管理中的痛觉过敏疼痛指数监测
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 25;61(2):213. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020213.
5
Liposomal Bupivacaine via an Adductor Canal Block Compared to a Peripheral Nerve Catheter and No Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.全膝关节置换术后经收肌管阻滞使用脂质体布比卡因与外周神经导管及不进行阻滞的比较:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66891. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66891. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Interventional Study.内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于前交叉韧带重建术后疼痛管理的前瞻性干预研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):e64625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64625. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Comparison of the Effects of Adductor Canal and Femoral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Inflammatory Factor Levels in Elderly Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Study.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞对老年全膝关节置换术后阿片类药物消耗及炎症因子水平影响的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 11;17:2375-2391. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463097. eCollection 2024.
8
Perioperative non-opioid analgesia strategies after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of prospective studies.全膝关节置换术后不同镇痛方式的疗效比较:一项系统评价和 Meta 分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2315-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04000-x. Epub 2024 May 17.
9
[Comparison of the effects of sciatic nerve block combined with continuted femoral nerve block or continuted adductor canal block on pain and motor function after total knee arthroplasty].[坐骨神经阻滞联合持续股神经阻滞或持续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及运动功能影响的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):556-561. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402048.
10
The Impact of Acute Postoperative Pain in Developing Chronic Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后急性疼痛对慢性疼痛形成的影响。
Neurol Int. 2024 Apr 18;16(2):459-469. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16020034.
收肌管阻滞与连续股神经阻滞在初次全膝关节置换术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.036. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Comparison of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.股内侧肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e2983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002983.
5
The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.全膝关节置换术后使用股神经阻滞与内收肌管阻滞的跌倒风险:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237.
6
Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty for mobilisation capability and pain treatment: a randomised and blinded clinical trial.全膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞与连续股神经阻滞对活动能力及疼痛治疗的效果:一项随机双盲临床试验
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2403-7. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Analgesic efficacy and quadriceps strength of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的镇痛效果及股四头肌力量比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2614-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3874-3. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与股神经阻滞相比,收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后效果更佳:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2998-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
9
Discharge Readiness after Tricompartment Knee Arthroplasty: Adductor Canal versus Femoral Continuous Nerve Blocks-A Dual-center, Randomized Trial.三切口膝关节置换术后出院准备:收肌管阻滞与股神经连续阻滞——一项双中心、随机试验。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):444-56. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000741.
10
Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement.超声引导下连续收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(23):4077-81.