Suppr超能文献

收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R. China.

Department of Prosthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40721. doi: 10.1038/srep40721.

Abstract

Femoral nerve blocks (FNB) can provide effective pain relief but result in quadriceps weakness with increased risk of falls following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Adductor canal block (ACB) is a relatively new alternative providing pure sensory blockade with minimal effect on quadriceps strength. The meta-analysis was designed to evaluate whether ACB exhibited better outcomes with respect to quadriceps strength, pain control, ambulation ability, and complications. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) and the Cochrane Database were searched for RCTs comparing ACB with FNB after TKAs. Of 309 citations identified by our search strategy, 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Compared to FNB, quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was significantly higher for ACB, which was consistent with the results regarding quadriceps strength assessed with manual muscle strength scale. Moreover, ACB had significantly higher risk of falling versus FNB. At any follow-up time, ACB was not inferior to FNB regarding pain control or opioid consumption, and showed better range of motion in comparison with FNB. ACB is superior to the FNB regarding sparing of quadriceps strength and faster knee function recovery. It provides pain relief and opioid consumption comparable to FNB and is associated with decreased risk of falls.

摘要

股神经阻滞(FNB)可以提供有效的止痛效果,但在全膝关节置换术后(TKA)会导致股四头肌无力,增加跌倒的风险。收肌管阻滞(ACB)是一种相对较新的替代方法,可提供纯感觉阻滞,对股四头肌力量的影响最小。该荟萃分析旨在评估 ACB 在股四头肌力量、疼痛控制、步行能力和并发症方面是否具有更好的效果。通过对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、万方、中国知网(CNKI)和 Cochrane 数据库进行检索,比较了 TKA 后 ACB 与 FNB 的 RCT。通过我们的搜索策略,共确定了 309 条引文,其中 12 项 RCT 符合纳入标准。与 FNB 相比,ACB 的股四头肌最大等长收缩(MVIC)明显更高,与手动肌肉力量评估的股四头肌力量结果一致。此外,ACB 与 FNB 相比,跌倒的风险明显更高。在任何随访时间,ACB 在疼痛控制或阿片类药物消耗方面并不逊于 FNB,与 FNB 相比,其活动范围更好。与 FNB 相比,ACB 具有更好的股四头肌力量保留和更快的膝关节功能恢复效果。它提供了与 FNB 相当的疼痛缓解和阿片类药物消耗,并且与跌倒风险降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e2/5228345/8686a3a94a60/srep40721-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验